Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Idea Whose Time Had Come: The Turn to Inclusion in New Zealand’s Education Policy

  • Article
  • Published:
New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 1996 the New Zealand government announced the aim of achieving a “world class inclusive education system” in its new policy, Special Education 2000 (SE2000). The use of the language of inclusion in SE2000 was a new departure in the official policy lexicon and signalled that New Zealand had joined other countries in embracing the principles of inclusion in education policy. This article examines the development and trajectory of inclusive education policy in New Zealand during the 1980s and 1990s. Through an historical examination of developments in that period, the article shows that while the use of the language of inclusion in SE2000 may have been novel to the policy lexicon, the ideas and precepts underpinning inclusion were not new and had been voiced in New Zealand’s education and wider social context for many years. The article concludes with the proposition that the turn to inclusion in New Zealand education was long in the making and that its announcement in SE2000 confirmed what was an inevitable policy direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Artiles, A., & Dyson, A. (2005). Inclusive education in the globalization age: The promise of comparative cultural-historical analysis. In D. Mitchell (Ed.), Contextualising inclusive education: Evaluating old and new international perspectives (pp. 35–62). Oxfordshire: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artiles, A., Kozleski, E. B., Dorn, S., & Christensen, C. (2006). Learning in inclusive education research: Remediating theory and methods with a transformative agenda. Review of Research in Education, 30, 60–108. doi:10.3102/0091732X030001065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, K. (1990). Special education in New Zealand: Disability, politics and empowerment. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 37, 109–124. doi:10.1080/0156655900370204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, K. (1996). Inclusive education in New Zealand: Culture, context and ideology. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26, 33–45. doi:10.1080/0305764960260103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaton, M. C., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2014). Changing legislation on inclusive and special education: Perspectives across the four nations of the UK. British Journal of Special Education, 41, 340–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., & Wills, R. (2000). Special Education 2000: Getting it right together? Paper presented at the ISEC 2000, University of Manchester. Retrieved from: http://www.isec2000.org.uk/abstracts/papers_b/brown_1.htm.

  • Cline, T., & Frederickson, N. (2014). Models of service delivery and forms of provision. In L. Florian (Ed.), The Sage handbook of special education (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 39–54). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education. (1987). Draft review of special education. Wellington: Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, A. (2001). Special needs in the twenty-first century: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. British Journal of Special Education, 28, 24–29. doi:10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, A., & Millward, A. (2000). Schools and special needs: Issues of innovation and inclusion. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Act 1989.

  • Education Reform Implementation Team. (1990). Today’s schools: A review of the education reform implementation process. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, A., & Lipsky, D. K. (2009). Beyond special education: Towards a quality system for all students. In P. Hick & G. Thomas (Eds.), Inclusion and diversity in education: Learning from diverse voices in inclusive education (Vol. 4, pp. 185–217). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson, A., & Vikerman, P. (2009). Key issues in special education needs and inclusion. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Act 1993.

  • McDonald, L. (1995). Special Education in 1994: Practice in search of a policy. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 4, 191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMenamin, T. (2008). New Zealand day-special schools: Changes and challenges under special education 2000. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 18, 183–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, A., & Brown, D. (1987). Provisions for special education in New Zealand. In D. Mitchell & N. N. Singh (Eds.), Exceptional children in New Zealand (pp. 39–56). Palmerston North: The Dunmore Press Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (1991). Special education in New Zealand: Statement of intent. Wellington: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (1993). The New Zealand curriculum framework. Wellington: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (2001). Paradigm shifts in and around special education in New Zealand. Cambridge Journal of Education, 31, 319–335. doi:10.1080/0305764960260103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. R. (Ed.). (2005). Contextualising inclusive education: Evaluating old and new international perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. R. (2010). Education that fits: Review of international trends in the education of students with special educational needs. Retrieved from: https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/special_education/education-that-fits-review-of-international-trends-in-the-education-of-students-with-special-educational-needs/executive-summary

  • Mitchell, D. R., & Mitchell, J. W. (1985). Out of the shadows: A chronology of significant events in the development of services for exceptional children and young persons in New Zealand, 1850–1983. Hamilton: University of Waikato.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. R., & Ryba, K. (1994). Students with education support needs: Review of criteria for admission to special education facilities and for the allocation of discretionary resources: Report prepared for the Ministry of Education. Hamilton: University of Waikato.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moltzen, R., Mitchell, D. R., & Middleton, S. (1992). Children with special needs. Hamilton: Monitoring Today’s Schools Research Project, University of Waikato.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand, C. C. S. (1991). Inclusive education for all: A report on the interagency visit to Sweden, Denmark and Canada, October–November 1990. Wellington: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleek, D., & Howie, D. (1987). Legislation, rights and advocacy. In D. R. Mitchell & N. N. Singh (Eds.), Exceptional children in New Zealand (pp. 57–69). Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Special Education Policy Implementation Team (1993). Final report of the Special Education Policy Implementation Team on delivering special education. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.

  • Winzer, M. A. (2009). From integration to inclusion: A history of special education in the 20th century. Washington: Gallaudet University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trish McMenamin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McMenamin, T. An Idea Whose Time Had Come: The Turn to Inclusion in New Zealand’s Education Policy. NZ J Educ Stud 52, 109–121 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-017-0077-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-017-0077-0

Keywords

Navigation