The political schooling emphasis on fixed fiscal input and improved student outcomes constitutes a significant challenge for practitioners who are held accountable for the quality of education provision. Professional learning and development (PLD) is a key policy lever for shifting practice in schools and driving philosophical change. In recent years, there have been moves to increase control of both PLD funding directions (the what) and the nature of the service provision (the who), with providers requiring accreditation. This article provides brief commentary on the history of PLD provision and a consideration of whether moves to regulate providers could be another form of ‘cruel optimism’, a good idea at the time yet in actuality, an obstacle to flourishing.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
AITSL & The Innovation Unit. (2014). Global trends in professional learning and performance & development: Some implications and ideas for the Australian Education System. AITSL. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/defaultsource/aitslresearch/insights/re00077_global_trends_in_professional_learning_and_performance_-amp-_development_innovation_unit_may_2014.pdf?sfvrsn=4.
Smardon, D., & Charteris, J. (2012). Between a rock and a hard place: Teacher professional learning. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 9(1), 27–35. http://www.teacherswork.ac.nz/journal/volume9_issue1/smardon.pdf.
Charteris, J., & Thomas E. (2016). Uncovering ‘unwelcome truths’ through student voice: Teacher inquiry into agency and student assessment literacy. Teaching Education, 1–16. doi:10.1080/10476210.2016.1229291.
Benade, L. (2015). Bits, bytes and dinosaurs: Using Levinas and Freire to address the concept of ‘twenty-first century learning’. Educational Philosophy and Theory: Incorporating ACCESS, 47(9), 935–948. doi:10.1080/00131857.2015.1035159.
Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2006). Troubling images of teaching in no child left behind. Harvard Educational Review, 76(4), 668–697.
Cross, J. (2011). Informal learning: Rediscovering the natural pathways that inspire innovation and performance. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2010). Governmentality and academic work. Shaping the hearts and minds of academic workers. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 26(3), 5–20.
Evans, L. (2008). Professionalism, professionality and the development of education professionals. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56, 20–38.
Fiske, E., & Ladd, H. (2001). Self-governing schools and accountability in New Zealand. School Autonomy and Evaluation Prospects, 31(4), 537–552.
Foucault, M. (2000). Governmentality. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Essential works of Michel Foucault, 1954–1983 (Vol. 3, pp. 201–222). New York, NY: The New Press.
Harland, T., Tidswell, T., Everett, D., Hale, L., & Pickering, N. (2010). Neoliberalism and the academic as critic and conscience of society. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(1), 85–96. doi:10.1080/13562510903487917.
King, K., & Zucker, S. (2005). Curriculum narrowing. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Lingard, B., Martino, W., & Rezai-Rashti, G. (2013). Testing regimes, accountabilities and education policy: Commensurate global and national developments. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 539–556. doi:10.1080/02680939.2013.820042.
Lom, E., & Sullenger, K. (2011). Informal spaces in collaborations: exploring the edges/boundaries of professional development. Professional Development in Education, 37(1), 55–74. doi:10.1080/19415257.2010.489811.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum for English-medium teaching and learning in years 1-13. Wellington: Learning Media Limited.
Ministry of Education. (2010). National standards. Retrieved from http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/National-Standards.
Ministry of Education. (2012). Statement of intent 2012–2017. Retrieved from http://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Ministry/Publications/Statements-of-intent/2012StatementOfIntent.pdf.
Ministry of Education. (2016a). Professional learning and development is changing. Retrieved from http://services.education.govt.nz/pld.
Ministry of Education. (2016b). Accessing centrally-funded PLD. Retrieved from http://services.education.govt.nz/pld/information-for-principals-and-school-leaders/accessing-centrally-funded-pld/.
Ministry of Education. (2016c). A framework for transforming learning in schools: Innovation and the spiral of inquiry. Retrieved from http://www.educationalleaders.govt.nz/Pedagogy-and-assessment/Evidence-based-leadership/Data-gathering-and-analysis/The-spiral-of-inquiry.
Ministry of Education. (2016d). Why are we changing PLD? Retrieved from http://services.education.govt.nz/pld/background/why-are-we-changing-pld/.
Mockler, N. (2005). Trans/forming teachers: New professional learning and transformative teacher professionalism. Journal of In-service Education, 31, 733–746.
O’Neill, A. (2015). The New Zealand experiment: assessment-driven curriculum–managing standards, competition and performance to strengthen governmentality. Journal of Education Policy, 30(6), 831–854. doi:10.1080/02680939.2015.1033766.
Roberts, P. (2007). Intellectuals, tertiary education and questions of difference. Education Theory and Philosophy, 39(5), 480–493.
Rose, N. (1996). Governing ‘advanced’ liberal democracies. In N. Rose, A. Barry, & T. Osborne (Eds.), Foucault and political reason (pp. 37–64). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sachs, J. (2011). Learning to improve or improving learning: the dilemma of teacher continuing professional development. Retrieved from http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISBN/978-961-6573-65-8/009-020.pdf
Sachs, J. (2016). Teacher professionalism: Why are we still talking about it? Teachers and Teaching, 22(4), 413–425. doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1082732.
Schutz, A. (2004). Rethinking domination and resistance: Challenging postmodernism. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 15–23.
Sheterline, R. C. (2013). An exploration of Board of Trustees’ perceptions of their impact on student learning (Thesis, Master of Educational Leadership (MEdLeadership)). University of Waikato, Hamilton. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10289/8480.
Timperley, H., Kaser, L., & Halbert, J. (2014). A framework for transforming learning in schools: Innovation and the spiral of inquiry. Centre for Strategic Education, Seminar Series Paper No. 234. Retrieved from http://www.educationalleaders.govt.nz/Pedagogy-and-assessment/Evidence-based-leadership/Data-gathering-and-analysis/The-spiral-of-inquiry.
Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/48727127.pdf.
The authors thank the New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies reviewers for their supportive comments while the article was in production.
About this article
Cite this article
Smardon, D., Charteris, J. Raising the Bar for Teacher Professional Learning and Development? Or Just Cruel Optimism?. NZ J Educ Stud 52, 177–183 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-017-0075-2
- Professional learning
- Professional development
- Education policy