Skip to main content
Log in

Teaching as Inquiry: Well Intentioned, but Fundamentally Flawed

  • Published:
New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article draws on a larger research project that questions the impacts of ‘21st century learning’ on teachers and leaders. Implicit is an evaluation of the promise of futures pedagogies to deepen teacher reflective practice. Critical theoretic and critical hermeneutic approaches underpin this research. It therefore analyses policy and documents critically, considers existing research critically, and triangulates by reference to interview material. In arguing for a concept of collaborative, critical teacher reflective practice, this article presents teaching as inquiry as a flawed model, suggesting the label ‘teaching as inquiry’ be abandoned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research informing this article was supported by funding awarded in 2013 and 2014 by the Faculty of Culture and Society of Auckland University of Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leon Benade.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benade, L. Teaching as Inquiry: Well Intentioned, but Fundamentally Flawed. NZ J Educ Stud 50, 107–120 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-015-0005-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-015-0005-0

Keywords

Navigation