Skip to main content
Log in

The Impact of Intensive Writing Workshop Professional Development on a Cross-Curricular Group of Secondary Teachers

  • Published:
New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on the responses of six secondary teachers to a six-day writing workshop led by the author in January, 2013. These teachers, representing a range of subject areas, underwent this professional learning as key participants in a two-year, participatory action research project being conducted in their school entitled: “A culture of writing: Impacting on teacher and student performance across the curriculum”. The specific focus of this paper is which writing workshop features and practices are viewed positively by teacher-participants as contributing to increased self-efficacy as writers and teachers of writing? To gauge teachers’ responses to the workshop, two datasets were analysed by the author: 1. a questionnaire completed at the conclusion at the workshop which included response items that were rated on a 10-point Likert scale, and open-ended prompts where participants could comment on aspects of their experience; and 2. a final-day focus group. A range of themes emerged across both datasets related to the use of response groups, workshop features contributing (or not) to learning about writing, workshop features contributing (or not) to writer confidence, and the likelihood of future classroom use of writing project activities. A discussion of these findings reveals interesting convergences and divergences in the responses of these teachers to writing workshop participation, especially in relation to the range of subjects they represented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Professor Ruie Pritchard, North Carolina State University.

  2. A further 4 teachers were “inducted” into the project as Group 2 teachers in December 2013 and participated in a similar workshop in January, 2014.

References

  • Andrews, R. (2008). The case for a National Writing Project for teachers. Reading, UK: CfBT Education Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. (2013). Supporting student growth in syntactical fluency as writers: A paired learning approach. Master’s thesis. The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dix, S., & Cawkwell, G. (2011). The influence of peer group response: Building a teacher and students’ expertise in the writing classroom. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(4), 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., Myhill, D., & Bailey, T. (2013). Grammar for writing? An investigation of the effects of contextualised grammar teaching on students’ writing. Reading and Writing, 26(8), 1241–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, T. (2010). Beyond the grammar wars: A resource for teachers and students on developing language knowledge in the English/literacy classroom. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, T., & Kato, H. (2012). Poetry for the broken-hearted: How a marginal Year 12 English class was turned on to writing. English in Australia, 47(1), 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, T., Whitehead, D., & Dix, S. (2013). The impact of “Writing Project” professional development on teachers’ self-efficacy as writers and teachers of writing. English in Australia, 48(2), 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, T., Whitehead, D., Dix, S., & Cawkwell, G. (2011). Zealand teachers respond to the “National Writing Project” experience. Teacher Development, 15(3), 273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., Johnson, M., & Usher, E. (2007). Sources of writing self-efficacy beliefs of elementary, middle, and high school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 42(1), 104–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, R., & Honeycutt, R. (2007). Best practices in implementing a process approach to teaching writing. In S. Graham, C. MacArthur, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (pp. 28–49). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, D., & Murphy, F. (2012). Teaching causal text connectives in chemistry. NZ Science Teacher, 129, 36–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, A. (2008). Teacher transformation in the National Writing Project. Research in the Teaching of English, 43(2), 144–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., & Lieberman, A. (2000). Teachers as authors: The National Writing Project’s approach to professional development. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 3(3), 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Professor Ruie Pritchard of North Carolina State University for her participation in the workshop and for collaborating in the process of data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terry Locke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Locke, T. The Impact of Intensive Writing Workshop Professional Development on a Cross-Curricular Group of Secondary Teachers. NZ J Educ Stud 50, 137–151 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-015-0003-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-015-0003-2

Keywords

Navigation