In 2006 the Catholic Education Commission, Victoria, Australia, entered into an agreement with the Centre for Academic Teacher Training of the Faculty of Theology of the Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium, to conduct research which would frame the identity structure of Victorian Catholic schools (Pollefeyt and Bouwens in Int Stud Cathol Educ 2(2):193–211, 2010). As this agreement has now been extended to other dioceses in Australia, there is widespread interest in the project and in how to respond to its findings. Indeed, the finding that a disproportionate number of students are demonstrating strong fundamentalist belief has brought into sharp focus the very way that religious education is taught in Australia. Calls for a new, hermeneutical, model of religious education are loud and persuasive. But while dioceses search for religious education that emphasises dialogue, embraces religious pluralism and promotes active enquiry, this paper contends that they are overlooking a major impediment in the development of post-critical belief; theme or topic-based religious education curriculum programmes. This paper proposes two weaknesses inherent in this design model. First, in reducing Scripture to the role of validating or proving the predetermined theme Scripture is used in a manner that is a priori, an approach that, of itself, invites a literalist reading. Second, as the theme or topic is known by students at the outset of learning any interpretation by them is rendered unnecessary; passages mean what the theme teaches that they mean. These two realities, it will be argued, make theme or topic-based curriculum design incompatible with a hermeneutical approach to religious education. It is to be noted that this paper does not attempt to argue the existence of the practices described. This has been done elsewhere (Carswell in Rymarz and Belmonte (eds.) Religious education in Australian Catholic schools. Exploring the landscape, Garratt, Mulgrave, 2017, Br J Relig Educ 40(3): 288–297, https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2018.1493271, 2018). Rather, it offers only a summary of the problems associated with the placement of Scripture in theme-based curricula deliberately framed around Pollefeyt and Bouwens (Identity in dialogue. Assessing and enhancing the Catholic school identity. Research methodology and research results in Catholic schools in Victoria, Lit-Verlag, Hamburg, 2014) own concerns. It is hoped that, in responding to ECSI, dioceses in Australia will consider their use of theme-based religious education. This paper will conclude by outlining a new direction for religious education, one that allows Scripture to speak for itself.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Australian Episcopal Conference. (1970). The renewal of the education of faith: A translation of the original document from the Italian Episcopal Conference. Sydney: E.J. Dwyer.
Bowie, R. A. (2017). Interpreting texts more wisely: A review of research and the case for change in English Religious Education. In J. Shortt & R. Stuart-Buttle (Eds.), Christian faith, formation and education (pp. 211–228). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bowie, R. A., & Coles, R. (2018). ‘We reap what we sew: Perpetuating biblical illiteracy in new English Religious Studies exams and the proof text binary question. British Journal of Religious Education, 40(3), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2018.1493270.
Brisbane Catholic Education Office. (2018). Retrieved November 7, 2018, from https://curriculum.bne.catholic.edu.au/Curriculum/LearningArea?learningAreaName=Religious%20Education.
Carswell, M. (1995). Educating into discipleship. Unpublished masters thesis, Australian Catholic University, Victoria, Australia.
Carswell, M. F. (2006). Biblical metaphors for God in the primary Level of the Education Series ‘To Know Worship and Love’. Unpublished PhD thesis, Australian Catholic University, Victoria, Australia.
Carswell, M. F. (2017). Between desire and reality: The presentation of Scripture in religious education. In R. Rymarz & A. Belmonte (Eds.), Religious education in Australian catholic schools. Exploring the landscape. Mulgrave: Garratt.
Carswell, M. F. (2018). Promoting fundamentalist belief? How Scripture is presented in three religious education programmes in Catholic primary schools in Australia and England and Wales. British Journal of Religious Education, 40(3), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2018.1493271.
Duriez, B., Dezutter, J., Neyrinck, B., & Hutsebaut, D. (2007). An introduction to the Post-Critical Belief scale: Internal structure and external relationships. Psyke and Logos, 28, 767–793.
Erdozain, L. (1983). The evolution of catechetics: A survey of six international study weeks on catechetics. In M. Warren (Ed.), Book for modern catechetics. Winona: Christian Brothers Press.
Grace, M. J. (2003). The use of Scripture in the teaching of religious education in Victorian Catholic secondary schools. Unpublished PhD thesis, Australian Catholic University, Victoria, Australia.
Holm, J. (1983). Teaching religion in school. A practical approach. London: Oxford University Press.
Madgen, D. (1993). The use of the Bible in Australian Catholic primary school: A critical examination of approaches to teaching the Bible in curriculum documents used in Australian Catholic primary schools. Unpublished MEd thesis, University of South Australia.
Pollefeyt, D., & Bieringer, R. (2005). The role of the Bible in Religious Education Reconsidered. Risks and challenges in teaching the Bible. International Journal of Practical Theology, 9, 117–139.
Pollefeyt, D., Bouwens, J. (2009). The post-critical belief scale for dummies. Centre of Academic Teacher Training, Faculty of Theology, K.U. Leuven. Retrieved April 30, 2018, from http://www.schoolidentity.net/docs/The%20Post-Critical%20Belief%20Scale%20for%20dummies%20(EN)%20v1.2.pdf.
Pollefeyt, D., & Bouwens, J. (2010). Framing the identity of Catholic Schools: Empirical methodology for quantitative research on the Catholic identity of and education institute. International Studies in Catholic Education, 2(2), 193–211.
Pollefeyt, D., & Bouwens, J. (2014). Identity in Dialogue. Assessing and enhancing the Catholic school identity. Research methodology and research results in Catholic schools in Victoria. Hamburg: Lit-Verlag.
Pontifical Biblical Commission. (1993). The Interpretation of the Bible in the Church. Address of His Holiness John Paul II and Document of the Pontifical Biblical Commission. Rome: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
Stead, B. (1996). the influence of critical biblical study on the teaching and use of Scripture in Catholic schools in Victoria. Unpublished PhD thesis, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.
Wulff, D. M. (1991). Psychology and religion. Classic and contemporary views. New York: Wiley.
About this article
Cite this article
Carswell, M. Teaching Scripture: moving towards a hermeneutical model for religious education in Australian Catholic Schools. j. relig. educ. 66, 213–223 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-018-0070-z
- Religious education
- Catholic identity
- Catholic schools