Advertisement

Journal of Religious Education

, Volume 64, Issue 1, pp 33–46 | Cite as

Some headmaster perspectives on cultures and beliefs in multicultural schools: a qualitative interview study

  • Mikaela Björklund
  • Mårten Björkgren
Article
  • 101 Downloads

Abstract

This article presents a headmaster perspective on cultures and religious education (RE) and ethics in some multicultural Swedish-medium primary schools in Finland. The aim is to identify characteristic patterns in headmasters’ thoughts on the multicultural school environment. The data were gathered within the VI VILL-community case study in a multicultural community in Finland, and consists of qualitative interviews with all primary school headmasters (N = 7) in that municipality. The qualitative issue-focussed analysis of the interviews brings forth several perspectives on the multicultural school and the challenges related to RE and ethics. Dimensions ranging from knowledge and administration to educational practices, feelings and opportunities for participation are represented in the data and their relevance discussed in relation to interculturality, the two-way dimension of integration and some previous studies related to headmasters’ thoughts on faith-related education.

Keywords

Integration Multicultural school Worldviews Interculturality Qualitative interviews 

References

  1. Baker, C., & Prys Jones, S. (1998). Encyclopedia of bilingualism and bilingual education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  2. Banks, J. A., & McGee Banks, C. A. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed.). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol13/iss4/2.
  4. Björklund, M., Björklund, S., & Sjöholm, K. (2013). Multilingual policies and multilingual education in the Nordic countries. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 6(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Byrd Clark, J. S., & Dervin, F. (Eds.). (2014). Introduction. In Reflexivity in language and intercultural education. Rethinking multiculturalism and interculturality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. CEF. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Council of Europe, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education (4th ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Creutz, K., & Helander, M. (2012). Vi svenska. Den svenska integrationsvägen. Magma-studie 1/2012. Helsingfors: Finlands svenska tankesmedja Magma. http://magma.fi/uploads/media/study/0001/01/8749a8d80d2d542d5b8e077c755bdee71397c176.pdf.
  10. FINLEX. (2010). Lag om främjande av integration. http://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/ajantasa/2010/20101386.
  11. Geanellos, R. (2000). Exploring Ricoeur’s hermeneutic theory of interpretation as a method of analyzing research texts. Nursing Inquiry, 7, 112–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanhimäki, E. (2012). Morality, religion and spirituality in educators’ voices. In T. Van der Zee & T. J. Lovat (Eds.), New perspectives on religious and spiritual education. Research on religious and spiritual education (Vol. 4). New York: Waxmann Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times. Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hellgren, Z. (2015). Immigrant integration as a two-way process: Translating theory into practice. GRITim working paper nr. 23, Spring 2015. http://www.upf.edu/gritim/_pdf/wps23_Hellgren.pdf.
  15. Irobi, E. G. (May, 2005). Ethnic conflict management in Africa: A comparative case study of Nigeria and South Africa. Beyond Intractability. http://www.beyondintractability.org/casestudy/irobi-ethnic.
  16. Jalovaara, V. och Martikainen, T. (2010). Finland efter sekulariseringen. Från statskyrklighet till religiösa marknader. In T. Martikainen & V. Jalovaara (Eds.), Religionens återkomst. Brytningspunkter i kyrkan, religionen och kulturen. Uskonnon ylösnousemus. Kirkon, uskonnon ja kulttuurin murros. Helsingfors: Finlands svenska tankesmedja Magma. Magma-studie 4/2010. http://magma.fi/images/stories/reports/ms1004_religionen_web.pdf.
  17. Kallioniemi, A. (2015). Eurooppalaisia näkökulmia uskonnonopetukseen ja visioita suomalaisen mallin kehittämiseksi. In R. Hämäläinen & H. Pesonen (Eds.), Kohtaamisia: Kirjoituksia uskonnosta, arjesta ja monikultuurisuudesta. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto.Google Scholar
  18. Kallioniemi, A., & Matilainen, M. (2011). Headmasters’ conceptions of the Finnish religious education—Solution from the perspective of human rights. Nordidactica: journal of Humanities and Social Science Education, 2, 1–14. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:469187/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
  19. Kansanen, P., Hansén, S.-E., Sjöberg, J., & Kroksmark, T. (2011). Vad är allmändidaktik? In S.-E. Hansén & L. Forsman (Eds.), Allmändidaktik – vetenskap för lärare (pp. 29–50). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  20. Kramsch, C. (1998). Language and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2014). Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  22. Lahdenperä, P. (2010). Interkulturell pedagogik – vad, hur och varför? In P. Lahdenperä (Ed.), Interkulturell pedagogik i teori och praktik. Malmö: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  23. Larzén, E. (2005). In Pursuit of an Intercultural Dimension in EFL-Teaching. Exploring Cognitions among Finland-Swedish Comprehensive School Teachers. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Martin, J. N., & Nakayama, T. K. (2000). Intercultural communication in contexts (2nd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  25. Mattila, M., & Björklund, K. (2013). Tomaatteja, teollisuutta, monikulttuurisuutta. Aluekeskuksen tutkimuksia nro 5. Turku: Siirtolaisuusinstituutti.Google Scholar
  26. Mena, J., Toom, A., Leijen, Ä., Husu, J., Knezic, D., Heikonen, L., et al. (2015). Handbook on teaching. Teachers strategies in classroom: A student-teaching collection of cases from four European countries. http://gredos.usal.es/jspui/bitstream/10366/126554/3/HandbookACTTEA.pdf.
  27. Närpes stad. (2014). Språklig mångfald som mervärde. Närpes stads språkstrategi 2014–2016. http://www.narpes.fi/sv/administration/kommuninfo-och-dokument/stadgor-utredningar.
  28. Opetushallitus. (2006). Perusopetuksen muiden uskontojen opetussuunnitelmien perusteet 2006. http://www02.oph.fi/ops/perusopetus/netpkuskontojenopsit06.pdf.
  29. Opetushallitus. (2014). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2014. http://oph.fi/download/163777_perusopetuksen_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2014.pdf.
  30. Sakaranaho, T. (2013). Religious education in Finland. Temenos, Nordic Journal of Comparative Religion, 49/2, 225–254.Google Scholar
  31. Skeie, G. (2006). Plurality and pluralism in religious education. In M. de Souza, G. Durka, K. Engebretson, R. Jackson & A. McGrady (Eds.), International handbook of the religious, moral and spiritual dimensions in education. International handbooks of religion and education (Vol. 1, pp. 307–319). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Statistics Finland. (2014b). Religion. http://tilastokeskus.fi/tup/suoluk/suoluk_vaesto_en.html.
  33. Tirri, K. (2012). Religious and spiritual education as contributors to the development of the whole person. In T. van der Zee & T. J. Lovat (Eds.), New perspectives on religious and spiritual education. Waxmann: Berlin.Google Scholar
  34. Tornberg, U. (2001). Interkulturalitet – en reltion på gränsen mellan dåtid, nutid och framtid. In R. Ferm & P. Malmberg (Eds). Språkboken. En antologi om språkundervisning och språkinlärning. Stockholm: Liber Distribution.Google Scholar
  35. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö. (2013). Osallisena Suomessa -hankkeen arviointiraportti. http://www.tem.fi/files/38416/Osallisena_Suomessa_-hankkeen_arviointiraportti.pdf.
  36. Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers. The art and methods of qualitative interview studies. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  37. Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research. Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Catholic University 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Åbo Akademi UniversityVaasaFinland

Personalised recommendations