Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 690–695 | Cite as

Further Studies on the Recycle of Pyroprocessed Uranium

  • B. R. WestphalEmail author
  • J. C. Price
  • M. N. Patterson
Thematic Section: Molten Slags, Fluxes, and Salts for Sustainable Processing
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Molten Slags, Fluxes, and Salts for Sustainable Processing


Based on the initial investigations for the recycle of pyroprocessed uranium from used nuclear fuel, additional research has been conducted for the continued reduction in radiation levels and transuranic content of the uranium products. Although the pyroprocessing technology is performed in a shielded facility, the products most likely will be handled in an unshielded environment by interested entities. A radiation level as low as possible is desired so that further operations can be undertaken directly with the uranium products without additional radiation dose to the involved personnel. The transuranic content of the uranium will affect the subsequent waste streams generated and thus also should be minimized. Several potential improvements to the process have been investigated and include reheating uranium products, removal of surface contamination, a pre-distillation salt-draining step, and reduction in diluent addition. The progress of these improvements will be discussed as well as plans for further study.


Pyroprocessing Uranium recycle Radiation reduction 



The authors would like to thank both the Fuel Conditioning Facility operations personnel for their contributions and the Analytical Laboratory staff for chemical services. This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, Science, and Technology, under DOE-NE Idaho Operations Office Contract No. DE-AC07-05ID14517.


  1. 1.
    Chang YI (1990) The integral fast reactor. Nucl Technol 88:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Till CE, Chang YI (2012) Plentiful energy—the story of the integral fast reactor. CreateSpace, CharlestonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benedict RW, McFarlane HF (1998) EBR-II spent fuel demonstration project status. Radwaste 5:23Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li SX et al (2005) Electrorefining experience for pyrochemical processing of spent EBR-II driver fuel. In: Proceedings of the GLOBAL 2005, AESJ, Tsukuba, p 487Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Westphal BR et al (2008) On the development of a distillation process for the electrometallurgical treatment of irradiated spent nuclear fuel. Nucl Eng Technol 40:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Westphal BR et al (2015) Zirconium determination by cooling curve analysis during the pyroprocessing of used nuclear fuel. J Nucl Mater 457:241–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Westphal BR et al (2016) Investigations for the recycle of pyroprocessed uranium. In: Advances in molten slags, fluxes, and salts: proceedings of the 10th international conference on molten slags, fluxes, and salts, TMS, Warrendale, PA, pp 771–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fuger J (1985) Thermochemistry of the alkali metal and alkaline earth-actinide complex oxides. J Nucl Mater 130:253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cordfunke EHP et al (1975) Investigations on Cesium uranates-I characterization of the phases in the Cs-U-O system. J Inorg Nucl Chem 37:1433–1436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yamawaki M et al (1999) Effects of hydrogen/water vapor atmospheres upon vaporization of UO2-based complex oxides with Sr, Ba, and Cs by means of high temperature mass spectrometry. J Mass Spectrom Soc Jpn 47:16–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jeon MK et al (2012) Simulation of Cs behavior during the high temperature voloxidation process using the HSC chemistry code. J Nucl Mater 430:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Idaho FallsUSA

Personalised recommendations