Shape Memory and Superelasticity

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 309–312 | Cite as

Additive Manufacturing of Shape Memory Alloys

  • Jan Van Humbeeck


Selective Laser Melting (SLM) is an additive manufacturing production process, also called 3D printing, in which functional, complex parts are produced by selectively melting patterns in consecutive layers of powder with a laser beam. The pattern the laser beam is following is controlled by software that calculates the pattern by slicing a 3D CAD model of the part to be constructed. Apart from SLM, also other additive manufacturing techniques such as EBM (Electron Beam Melting), FDM (Fused Deposition Modelling), WAAM (Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing), LENS (Laser Engineered Net Shaping such as Laser Cladding) and binder jetting allow to construct complete parts layer upon layer. But since more experience of AM of shape memory alloys is collected by SLM, this paper will overview the potentials, limits and problems of producing NiTi parts by SLM.


Additive manufacturing Selective laser melting 3D printing Biocompatibility 


  1. 1.
    Elahinia MH, Hashemi M, Tabesh M, Bhaduri SB (2012) Manufacturing and processing of NiTi implants: a review. Prog Mater Sci 57:911–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elahinia MH, Shayesteh N, Andani MT, Amerintanzi A, Bimber BA, Hamilton RF (2016) Fabrication of NiTi through additive manufacturing: a review. Prog Mater Sci 83:630–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dadbakhsh S, Speirs M, Van Humbeeck J, Kruth J-P (2016) Laser additive manufacturing of bulk and porous shape-memory NiTi alloys: from processes to potential medical applications. MRS Bull 41:765–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bormann T, Müller B, Schinhammer M, Kessler A, Thajmann P, de Wild M (2014) Microstructure of selective laser melted nickel-titanium. Mater Charact 94:189–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dadbakhsh S, Vrancken B, Kruth J-P, Luyten J, Van Humbeeck J (2016) Texture and anisotropy in selective laser melting of NiTi alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 650:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haberland C, Elahinia M, Walker JM, Meier H, Frenzel J (2014) On the development of high quality NiTi shape memory and pseudoelastic parts by additive manufacturing. Smart Mater Struct 23:104002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borman T, Shumacher R, Müller B, Mertmann M, de Wild M (2012) Tailoring selective laser melting process parameters for NiTi implants. J Mater Eng Perform 21(12):2519–2524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dadbakhsh S, Speirs M, Kruth J-P, Schrooten J, Luyten J, Van Humbeeck J (2014) Effect of SLM parameters on transformation temperatures of Shape Memory Nickel Titanium Parts. Adv Eng Mater 16(9):1140–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang X, Speirs M, Kustov S, Vrancken B, Li X, Kruth J-P, Van Humbeeck J (2018) Selective laser melting produced layer-structured NiTi shape memory alloys with high damping properties and Elinvar effect. Scr Mater 146:246–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li S, Hassanin H, Attalah MM, Adkins NJE, Essa K (2016) The development of NiTi-based negative Poisson’s ratio structure using selective laser melting. Acta Mater 105:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Habijan T, Haberland C, Meier H, Frenzel J, Wittsiep J, Wuwer C, Greutlich C, Schildhauer TA, Köller M (2013) The biocompatibility of dense and porous Nickel-Titanium produced by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng, C 33:419–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gorgin Karaji Z, Speirs M, Dadbakhsh S, Kruth J-P, Weimans H (2017) A.A. Zadpoor and S. Amin Yavari, Additively manufactured and surface biofunctionalized porous nitinol. Appl Mater. Interfaces 9:1293–1304Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peirs M, Van Hooreweder B, Van Humbeeck J, Kruth J-P (2017) Fatigue behavior of NiTi shape memory alloy scaffolds produced by SLM, a unit cell design comparison. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 70:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jorgensen MR, Rollins T, Winters M (2016) Sterilization and biocompatibility of 3D-printed orthopedic devices: testing considerations.
  15. 15.
    Benafin O, Bigolow GS, Elahinia M, Moghaddam NS, Amerinatanzi A, Saedi S, Toker GP, Karaca H (2018) Additive manufacturing of NiTiHf high temperature shape memory alloy. Scr Mater 145:90–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gustman T, dos Santos JM, Gargarella P, Kühn U, Van Humbeeck J (2016) Properties of Cu-based shape-memory alloys prepared by selective laser melting. Superelasticity, Shape Mem. Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gustman T, Neves A, Kühn U, Gargarella P, Kiminami CS, Bolfarini C, Eckert J, Pauly S (2016) Influence of processing parameters on the fabrication of a Cu-Al-Ni-Mn shape memory alloy by selective laser melting. Addit Manuf 11:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khoo ZX, Teoh JEM, Liu Y, Chua CK, Yang S, An J, Leong KF, Yeong WY (2015) 3D printing of Smart Materials: a review on recent progress in 4D printing. Vis Phys Prototyp 10(3):103–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ma J, Franco B, Tapia G, Karayagiz K, Johnson L, Liu J, Arroyave R, Karaman I, Alwany A (2017) Spatial control of functional response in 4D-printed active metallic structures. Sci Rep 7:46707. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sam J, Franco B, Ma J, Karaman I, Elwany A, Mabe JH (2018) Tensile actuation response of additively manufactured nickel-titanium shape memory alloys. Scr Mater 146:164–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khoo ZX, Liu Y, Low ZH, An J, Chua CK (2018) Fabrication of SLM NiTi shape memory alloy via repetitive laser scanning. Shape Mem Superelasticity. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials EngineeringKULeuvenLouvainBelgium

Personalised recommendations