Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding Lewis activities

  • Lecture Text
  • Published:
ChemTexts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The notion of activity is of a purely thermodynamic nature. It is intimately linked to the law of mass action and more generally to that of equilibrium constant. It was conceived and introduced in the realm of chemistry at the beginning of twentieth century by Lewis (Proc Am Acad Arts Sci 37:49‒69, 1901; Proc Am Acad Arts Sci 43:259‒293, 1907; J Am Chem Soc 30:668‒683, 1908) and Lewis and Randall (Thermodynamics and the free energy of chemical substances. McGraw-Hill Book Company, London, 1923). Its introduction permits us to overcome insuperable theoretical and practical difficulties encountered in chemistry, physics and biochemistry with great ease. Before discussing the notion of activity, it is necessary to introduce ideal and non-ideal chemical systems, the different scales of unities permitting one to express their composition and the concept of chemical potential. Here, we seek to locate the notion of activity within the framework of classical thermodynamics. We shall see that its introduction in chemistry enables us to generalize the use of the Gibbs energy function (formerly, and still in German, called the free enthalpy function) for introducing the concept of chemical equilibrium. This is carried out by the introduction of the pivotal function known as chemical potential. Then, we set out the interest that represents the handling of activities. It, purely and simply, permits one to formulate the mass action law when the studied chemical systems are not ideal. This is the vast majority of cases! This is followed by introducing the notions of fugacity and activity from a general viewpoint. We then confine ourselves to the study of the activity of gases, those of non-electrolytes in liquid solutions, the activities of electrolytes, the determination of activities of non-electrolytes and of electrolytes, calculation of activities of electrolytes essentially with the aid of Debye–Hückel relations and that of activity coefficients and activities, their relations with another thermodynamic function, that is to say the excess Gibbs energy, the determination of pH of an aqueous solution, the general principles of calculations involving activities in solutions, and finally, the determination of thermodynamic equilibrium constants of polyfunctional compounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Think of the famous aphorism: \(\ln \left( {3{\text{apples}}} \right) = \ln 3 + \ln {\text{apples}}\)!.

  2. A possible confusion between the reference and the standard states comes from the fact that, in literature, states called “reference standard states” are sometimes mentioned for which a particular reference pressure is stipulated at a given temperature. We shall not use this term.

  3. The index r recalls the word “rational” resulting from an ancient name. Actually, according to IUPAC in the present case, the activity coefficient should be symbolized by f when the standard state is obtained according to Raoult’s law and when the different “concentrations” are expressed in molar fractions. We do not use this symbol, since confusion with fugacity is possible: \(\gamma_{\text{r}} = {{NP} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{NP} {MP}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {MP}}\), \(\gamma_{\text{r}} = {{NP} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{NP} {x_{1}^{\prime } }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {x_{1}^{\prime } }}\).

  4. In the following pages, we use the symbols γ+ (and γ) for the scale of molalities.

  5. These calculations can be easily performed on some pocket calculators. This process is general. The difficulty often lies at the level of obtaining the suitable root of the single equation stemming from the reduction of the system of initial equations which must be satisfied. Equations of the fourth order are not rare in this realm. Abel’s theorem stipulates that there are no general analytic solutions to equations with one unknown of order greater than four. However, several calculation routines permitting us to obtain the root, with the required precision, exist in the literature.

References

  1. Lewis GN (1901) Proc Am Acad Arts Sci 37:49–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis GN (1907) Proc Am Acad Arts Sci 43:259–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis GN (1908) J Am Chem Soc 30:668–683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis GN, Randall M (1923) Thermodynamics and the free energy of chemical substances. McGraw-Hill Book Company, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gibbs JW (1874–1878) Trans Connecticut Acad Arts Sci 3:108–248, 343–524

  6. The Scientific Papers of J. Willard Gibbs (1993) Vol 1, Thermodynamics. Ox Bow Press, Woodbridge

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burgot JL (2017) The notion of activity in chemistry. Springer, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Glasstone S (1960) Thermodynamics for chemists, 11th edn. Van Nostrand, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  9. Butler JN (1964) Ionic equilibrium: a mathematical approach. Addison-Wesley, Reading

  10. Kielland J (1937) J Am Chem Soc 59:1675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Scholz G, Scholz F (2014) ChemTexts 1:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Oldham KB, Parnis JM (2017) ChemTexts 3:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I acknowledge kind technical help by Anja Albrecht (University of Greifswald) in the preparations of figures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Louis Burgot.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burgot, JL. Understanding Lewis activities. ChemTexts 5, 16 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40828-019-0090-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40828-019-0090-7

Keywords

Navigation