Passive SCR Performance Under Pseudo-Transient Cycle: Challenges and Opportunities for Meeting Tier 3 Emissions


The passive ammonia (NH3) selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system is a potential approach for controlling nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from lean-burn gasoline engines based on utilizing NH3 generated by a three-way catalyst (TWC) during brief periods of fuel-rich engine operation. NH3 generated by the TWC is stored and available to reduce NOx on a downstream SCR catalyst during subsequent periods of lean engine operation. Control of the overall passive SCR process can be more challenging than current urea-based approach because it depends explicitly on fuel-rich engine operation, which must be implemented in the context of transient engine operation. Under transient engine operation, significant variation in SCR temperatures is also to be expected. With NH3 storage capacity highly dependent on exhaust temperatures, proper system architecture and engine operating strategy are needed for effective NH3 utilization over the SCR catalyst. In this study, the performance of a passive SCR system was evaluated on a 2.0-l BMW lean-burn gasoline direct injection engine under 6-mode pseudo-transient cycle. The aim of this work is to understand how various engine operating strategies change the dynamics of NH3 generation and utilization, and NOx reduction in the passive SCR system. A 5.9% fuel economy improvement relative to stoichiometric-only operation with 0.018 g/mi of NOx + NMHC emissions were demonstrated over 6-mode pseudo-transient cycle; however, CO emissions were twice the emission standard. The results of this work reveal challenges and opportunities for meeting Tier 3 emissions and improving fuel savings benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11


  1. 1.

    S. C. Davis, S. E. Williams, and R. G. Boundy: Transportation & Energy Data Book: Edition 36.1, 2018

  2. 2.

    C. Schwarz, E. Schünemann, B. Durst, J. Fischer, and A. Witt: Potentials of the spray-guided BMW DI combustion system. in SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-1265. no. 724 2006

  3. 3.

    P. Chambon, S. Huff, K. Norman, K. D. D. Edwards, J. Thomas, and V. Y. Prikhodko: European lean gasoline direct injection vehicle benchmark, in SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1218. vol. 1 2011

  4. 4.

    W. Li, K. L. Perry, K. Narayanaswamy, C. H. Kim, and P. Najt: Passive ammonia SCR system for lean-burn SIDI engines. SAE Int. J. Fuels. Lubr. vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 2010–01–0366 2010

  5. 5.

    C. H. Kim, K. Perry, M. Viola, W. Li, and K. Narayanaswamy: Three-way catalyst design for urealess passive ammonia SCR: lean-burn SIDI aftertreatment system, in SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0306. vol. 1, no. x 2011

  6. 6.

    V. Y. Prikhodko, J. E. Parks, J. A. Pihl, and T. J. Toops: Ammonia generation and utilization in a passive SCR (TWC+SCR) system on lean gasoline engine, SAE Int. J. Engines. vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 2016–01–0934 2016

  7. 7.

    V. Y. Prikhodko, J. E. Parks, J. A. Pihl, and T. J. Toops: Ammonia generation over TWC for passive SCR NOx control for lean gasoline engines. SAE Int. J. Engines. vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 2014–01–1505 2014

  8. 8.

    Parks, J.E., Prikhodko, V., Partridge, W., Choi, J.S., Norman, K., Huff, S., Chambon, P.: Lean gasoline engine reductant chemistry during lean NOx trap regeneration. SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 3(2), 956–962 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Prikhodko, V.Y., Parks, J.E., Pihl, J.A., Toops, T.J.: Passive SCR for lean gasoline NOX control: engine-based strategies to minimize fuel penalty associated with catalytic NH3 generation. Catal. Today. 267, 202–209 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    V. Prikhodko, J. Pihl, T. Toops, and J. Parks: Effects of NOx storage component on ammonia formation in TWC for passive SCR NOx control in lean gasoline engines, in SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0946. vol. 2018, no. X, pp. 1–9 2018

  11. 11.

    C. S. Sluder and B. H. West: NMOG emissions characterizations and estimation for vehicles using ethanol-blended fuels, 2011

Download references


The authors thank program managers Ken Howden, Gurpreet Singh, and Mike Weismiller for their support and guidance. The authors also thank their colleagues Wei Li, Patrick Szymkowicz, Paul Battiston, Kushal Narayanaswamy, Arun Solomon, and Paul Najt of General Motors and Ken Price, David Moser, Tom Pauly, Chris Owens, and Davion Clark of Umicore for valuable discussion and guidance in parts of this work.


This research was financially supported by the US Department of Energy, Vehicle Technologies Program.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vitaly Y. Prikhodko.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under Contract No. DE-AC0500OR22725 with the US Department of Energy. The US Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for the US Government purposes. The Department of Energy will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prikhodko, V.Y., Pihl, J.A., Toops, T.J. et al. Passive SCR Performance Under Pseudo-Transient Cycle: Challenges and Opportunities for Meeting Tier 3 Emissions. Emiss. Control Sci. Technol. 5, 253–262 (2019).

Download citation


  • Passive SCR
  • TWC
  • Lean NOx
  • NH3 formation
  • Lean gasoline