A set of standardized and realistic aftertreatment catalyst test protocols have been developed by the Advanced Combustion and Emission Control Technical Team in support of the U.S. DRIVE Partnership. The protocols are intended to accelerate the pace of aftertreatment catalyst innovation by enabling the accurate evaluation and comparison of aftertreatment catalyst performance data from various testing and research facilities to maximize the impact of discovery-phase research occurring across the nation. The protocols address a need identified by the Partnership’s industry partners for consistent and accurate metrics for aftertreatment catalyst evaluation and comparison. The protocols consist of a set of standardized requirements and test procedures that sufficiently capture the performance capability of a catalyst technology in a manner that is adaptable in various laboratories. The protocols provide a detailed description of the necessary reactor system, the steps for achieving a desired aged state of the catalyst, all necessary sample pretreatments to be performed prior to testing, and realistic test conditions for evaluating performance. This article details four low-temperature catalyst test protocols applicable to (1) oxidation catalysts, (2) passive storage (and release) catalysts, (3) three-way catalysts, and (4) NH3-SCR catalysts. The catalyst test protocol descriptions are presented in five (5) sections: protocol general guidelines and the four individual catalyst test protocol descriptions. The general guidelines plus the individual protocol description forms the complete low-temperature catalyst test protocol for the application.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Advanced Combustion and Emission Control Technical Team Roadmap, a U.S.DRIVE report, June 2013. https://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/pdfs/program/acec_roadmap_june2013.pdf.
Future Automotive Aftertreatment Solutions: The 150 °C Challenge Workshop Report. November 2012. A U.S.DRIVE report from the LTAT Group of the ACEC Tech Team. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1097340.
Chu, S., Majumdar, A.: Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature. 488(7411), 294–303 (2012)
Kamasamudram, K., Currier, N.W., Chen, X., Yezerets, A.: Overview of the practically important behaviors of zeolite-based urea-SCR catalyst, using compact experimental protocol. Catal. Today. 151(3-4), 212–222 (2010)
Ruggeri, M.P., Luo, J., Nova, I., Tronconi, E., Kamasamudram, K., Yezerets, A.: Novel method of ammonium nitrate quantification in SCR catalysts. Catal. Today. 307, 48–54 (2018)
Dempsey, A., Curran, S., Storey, J., Eibl, M., et al.: Particulate matter characterization of reactivity controlled compression ignition (RCCI) on a light duty engine. SAE Technical Paper Series. (2014). https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-1596
Curran, S., Hanson, R., Wagner, R., Reitz, R.: Efficiency and emissions mapping of RCCI in a light-duty diesel engine. SAE Technical Paper Series. (2013). https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-0289
Curran, S., Hanson, R., Wagner, R.: Effect of E85 on RCCI performance and emissions on a multi-cylinder light-duty diesel engine. SAE Technical Paper Series. (2012). https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0376
Prikhodko, V., Curran, S., Barone, T., Lewis, S., et al.: Emission characteristics of a diesel engine operating with in-cylinder gasoline and diesel fuel blending. SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 3(2), 946–955 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-2266
Parks, J., Prikhodko, V., Partridge, W., Choi, J., et al.: Lean gasoline engine reductant chemistry during lean NOx trap regeneration. SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 3(2), 956–962 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-2267
Sellnau, M., Hoyer, K., Moore, W., Foster, M., et al.: Advancement of GDCI engine technology for US 2025 CAFE and tier 3 emissions. SAE Technical Paper Series. (2018). https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0901
Sellnau, M., Foster, M., Moore, W., Sinnamon, J., Hoyer, K., Klemm, W.: Second generation GDCI multi-cylinder engine for high fuel efficiency and US tier 3 emissions. SAE Int. J. Engines. 9(2), 1002–1020 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0760
Sellnau, M., Moore, W., Sinnamon, J., Hoyer, K., Foster, M., Husted, H.: GDCI multi-cylinder engine for high fuel efficiency and low emissions. SAE Int. J. Engines. 8(2), 775–790 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-0834
Truedsson, I., Turner, M., Johansson, B., Canella, W.: Emission formation study of HCCI combustion with gasoline surrogate fuels. SAE Technical Paper Series. (2013). https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-2626
Sluder, C., Wagner, R.: An estimate of diesel high-efficiency clean combustion impacts on FTP-75 aftertreatment requirements. SAE Technical Paper Series. (2006). https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-01-3311
Knafl, S., Busch, S.B., Han, M., Bohac, S.V., Assanis, D.N., Szynkowicz, P.G., Blint, R.D.: Characterizing light-off behavior and species-resolved conversion efficiencies during in-situ diesel oxidation catalyst degreening. SAE Technical Paper 2006-04-03 (2006)
DiMaggio, C., Theis, J., Li, W., Oh, S., Parks, J., Pihl, J., Rappé, K.G., Stewart, M.L., Fisher, G.B., Howden, K.: USDRIVE and advanced engine crosscut teams: roadmaps and protocols. 2016 CLEERS Workshop, Ann Arbor, MI. https://cleers.org/cleers-workshops/workshop-presentations/entry/60/. Accessed 12 February 2019
Yamamoto, S., Matsushita, K., Etoh, S., Takaya, M.: In-line hydrocarbon (HC) adsorber system for reducing cold-start emissions. SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0892 (2000)
Sampara, C.S., Bissett, E.J., Assanis, D.: Hydrocarbon storage modeling for diesel oxidation catalysts. Chem. Eng. Sci. 63(21), 5179–5192 (2008)
GM R&D Unpublished Results
Schmieg, S.J., Oh, S.H., Kim, C.H., Brown, D.B., Lee, J.H., Peden, C.H.F., Kim, D.H.: Thermal durability of Cu-CHA NH3-SCR catalysts for diesel NOX reduction. Catal. Today. 184(1), 252–261 (2012)
Xiang, X., Wu, P., Cao, Y., Cao, L., Wang, Q., Xu, S., Tian, P., Liu, Z.: Investigation of low-temperature hydrothermal stability of Cu-SAPO-34 for selective catalytic reduction of NOX with NH3. Chin. J. Catal. 338(5), 918–927 (2017)
The authors gratefully acknowledge the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office, and the U.S. Council for Automotive Research LLC (USCAR) for the support of this work. USCAR is a collaborative automotive technology company for FCA, Ford, and GM. The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is operated for the U.S. DOE by Battelle. The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is operated for the U.S. DOE by UT-Battelle. The low-temperature catalyst test protocols are a product of the Advanced Combustion and Emission Control (ACEC) Technical Team, one of 10 U.S. DRIVE technical teams. Contributions from Michelle Wiebenga (GM), D. William Brookshear (ORNL), and Chang Yup Seo (University of Michigan) are greatly appreciated for collection of the round-robin test results.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Rappé, K.G., DiMaggio, C., Pihl, J.A. et al. Aftertreatment Protocols for Catalyst Characterization and Performance Evaluation: Low-Temperature Oxidation, Storage, Three-Way, and NH3-SCR Catalyst Test Protocols. Emiss. Control Sci. Technol. 5, 183–214 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40825-019-00120-7
- Emission control
- Three-way catalyst
- Selective catalytic reduction
- Passive NOx adsorber
- Hydrocarbon trap