# Efficient Solution of Washcoat Diffusion-Reaction Problem for Real-Time Simulations

- 102 Downloads

## Abstract

As countries around the globe adapt more stringent emissions standards set by Real Driving Emissions (RDE) legislation, mathematical models are becoming ever more widely used as plant models for devising vehicle control strategies. It is important for the model to run on Hardware-in-Loop (HIL) and engine control unit (ECU) systems which have significantly less computational power and memory than modern personal computers. Washcoat diffusion limitations play a very important role in the efficient design of a catalytic converter. Numerical solution of aftertreatment models that include diffusion-reaction equations in the washcoat are computationally demanding. There are several simplified approaches proposed in the literature for the solution of diffusion-reaction equations in the washcoat to avoid the computational demand of the full numerical solution. In this paper, we use the recently proposed asymptotic solution and compare the results with that of the full numerical solution for the following aftertreatment reactor models with both single- and dual-layer washcoat configurations for the practical range of operating conditions; three-way catalyst (TWC), diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC), Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR), and ammonia slip catalyst (ASC). These reactor models are constructed using published kinetic mechanisms and represent the global kinetics mechanisms (including non-linear reaction orders and inhibition functions) commonly used in the aftertreatment modeling community. We also discuss the importance of adaptive mesh, quasi-steady state assumption, and occurrence of concentration jumps in the simulation of aftertreatment reactors.

## Keywords

Washcoat Diffusion Asymptotic Dual-layer Real time## Abbreviations

- \( {a}_{\mathrm{n}}^{(l)} \)
active site density of reaction n in layer l (mol − site/m

^{3})- \( {A}_{\mathrm{k}}^{(l)} \)
active site density for coverage k in layer l (mol − site/m

^{3})*C*_{pg}heat capacity of bulk gas (J/(Kg K))

- \( {C}_{\mathrm{p}}^l \)
heat capacity of washcoat layer l (J/(Kg K))

*C*_{p,sb}heat capacity of substrate (J/(Kg K))

*D*_{h}hydraulic diameter of channel (m)

*D*_{i,m}diffusivity of species i in the mixture (m

^{2}/s)- \( {D}_{\mathrm{i},\mathrm{eff}}^{(l)} \)
effective diffusivity of species i in washcoat layer l (m

^{2}/s)- \( {D}_{\mathrm{i},\mathrm{kn}}^{(l)} \)
Knudsen diffusivity of species i in washcoat layer l (m

^{2}/s)- \( {\boldsymbol{D}}_{\mathbf{inv}}^{\left(\boldsymbol{l}\right)} \)
diagonal matrix of dimensionless effective diffusion resistances in washcoat layer

*l*.- \( {d}_{\mathrm{p}}^{(l)} \)
pore diameter of washcoat layer

*l*(m)*f*^{(l)}volume fraction of layer

*l**f*_{sb}volume fraction of substrate

*f*_{vd}void fraction of reactor

*h*heat transfer coefficient (J/(m

^{2}s K))*h*_{x}external heat transfer coefficient (J/(m

^{2}s K))*k*_{i}mass transfer coefficient of species i (m/s)

**K**diagonal matrix of dimensionless mass transfer coefficients

*L*length of reactor (m)

- MW
_{i} molecular weight of species i (kg/mol)

*n*_{rxns}total number of reactions

*n*_{sp}total number of species

*R*_{g}gas constant (J/(mol K))

- \( {r}_{\mathrm{n}}^{(l)} \)
n

^{th}reaction rate in layer*l*(mol/(mol − site s))- \( {R}_{\mathrm{i}}^l \)
i

^{th}species rate in layer*l*(kg/(m^{3}s))**R**^{(l)}vector of species rates in layer

*l**s*_{i,n}stoichiometric coefficient of species i in reaction n

*S*specific area per reactor volume (m

^{−1})*S*_{x}external surface area per reactor volume (m

^{−1})*t*time (s)

*T*_{g}gas temperature (K)

*T*_{s}solid temperature (K)

*T*_{x}external temperature (K)

*u*average gas velocity (m/s)

*x*position through the washcoat thickness (m)

*z*axial position (m)

*δ*^{l}effective thickness of washcoat layer

*l*(m)*ε*^{(l)}porosity of layer

*l*- \( {\Delta H}_{\mathrm{n}}^{(l)} \)
heat of n

^{th}reaction in layer*l*(J/mol)- \( {\theta}_{\mathrm{k}}^{(l)} \)
surface coverages of species k in layer

*l**λ*^{(l)}thermal conductivity of layer

*l*(J/(m s K))*λ*_{sb}thermal conductivity of substrate (J/(m s K))

- Λ
_{s} effective thermal conductivity of reactor (J/(m s K))

*ρ*_{g}density of bulk gas (kg/m

^{3})*ρ*_{s}density of gas within washcoat (kg/m

^{3})*ρ*^{(l)}density of washcoat layer

*l*(kg/m^{3})*ρ*_{sb}density of substrate (kg/m

^{3})*σ*_{k,n}stoichiometric coefficient for coverage k in reaction n

- ψ
_{s} effective heat capacity of reactor (J/(m

^{3}K))*ω*_{g,i}mass fraction of species i in the bulk gas

**ω**_{g}vector of species mass fractions in the bulk gas

*ω*_{i}mass fraction of species i in the washcoat

**ω**vector of species fractions in the washcoat

*ω*_{s,i}mass fraction of species i at the washcoat/channel surface

**ω**_{s}vector of species fractions at the washcoat/channel surface

## Notes

### Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Ed Bissett who spent significant amount of time discussing the asymptotic solution, adaptive meshing, and inner workings of ODE solvers. We also thank Jonathan Brown for setting up some of the models used in this work.

### Compliance with Ethical Standards

### Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

## References

- 1.Heck, R.M., Farrauto, R.J., Gulati, S.T.: Catalytic Air Pollution Control: Commercial Technology. Wiely publication (2016)Google Scholar
- 2.Joshi, S.Y., Harold, M.P., Balakotaiah, V.: Overall mass transfer coefficients and controlling regimes in catalytic monoliths. Chem. Eng. Sci.
**65**, 1729–1747 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 3.Metkar, P.S., Harold, M.P., Balakotaiah, V.: Experimental and kinetic modeling study of NH3-SCR of NOx on Fe-ZSM-5, Cu-chabazite and combined Fe- and Cu-zeolite monolith catalysts. Chem. Eng. Sci.
**87**, 51–66 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 4.Vaclavik, M., Koci, P., Novak, V., Thompsett, D.: NOx conversion and selectivity in multi-layer and sequential DOC-LNT automotive exhaust catalysts: influence of internal transport. Chem. Eng. J.
**329**, 128–134 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 5.Gundlapally, S.R., Papadimitriou, I., Wahiduzzaman, S., Gu, T.: Development of ECU capable models from detailed models—application to a SCR reactor. Emission Control Science and Technology.
**2**, 124–136 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 6.Aris, R.: The Mathematical Theory of Diffusion And Reaction in Permeable Catalysts, Volume I, the Theory of the Steady State. Oxford University Press, London (1975)Google Scholar
- 7.Balakotaiah, V.: On the relationship between Aris and Sherwood numbers and friction and effectiveness factors. Chem. Eng. Sci.
**63**, 5802–5812 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 8.Bissett, E.J.: An asymptotic solution for washcoat pore diffusion in catalytic monoliths. Emission Control Science and Technology.
**1**(1), 3–16 (2015a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 9.Bissett, E.J.: Small Washcoat Diffusion Resistance, Further Developments. CLEERS Workshop, Dearborn (2015b)Google Scholar
- 10.Mozaffari, B., Tischer, S., Votsmeier, M., Deutschmann, O.: A one-dimensional modeling approach for dual-layer monolith catalysts. Chem. Eng. Sci.
**139**, 196–210 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 11.Rink, J., Mozaffari, B., Tischer, S., Deutschmann, O., Votsmeier, M.: Real-time simulation of dual-layer converters based on the internal mass transfer coefficient approach. Top. Catal.
**60**, 225–229 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 12.Groppi, G., Belloli, A., Tronconi, E., Forzatti, P.: A comparison of lumped and distributed models of monolithic catalytic combustors. Chem. Eng. Sci.
**50**, 2705–2715 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 13.Gundlapally, S. R. (2011) Effect of non-uniform activity and conductivity on the steady-state and transient performance of catalytic reactors. PhD thesis, University of HoustonGoogle Scholar
- 14.Gundlapally, S.R., Balakotaiah, V.: Heat and mass transfer correlations and bifurcation analysis of catalytic monoliths with developing flows. Chem. Eng. Sci.
**66**(9), 1879–1892 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 15.Fuller, E.N., Ensley, K., Giddings, J.C.: Diffusion of halogenated hydrocarbons in helium. The effect of structure on collision cross sections. J. Phys. Chem.
**73**(11), 3679–3685 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 16.Bird, R.B., Stewart, W.E., Lightfoot, E.N.: Transport Phenomena, p. 258. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1960)Google Scholar
- 17.Scheuer, A., Hauptmann, W., Drochner, A., Gieshoff, J., Vogel, H., Votsmeier, M.: Dual layer automotive ammonia oxidation cataysts: experiments and computer simulation. Appl. Catal. B Environ.
**111–112**, 445–455 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 18.Nova, I., Colombo, M., Tronconi, E., Schmeisser, V., Bandle-Konrad, B., Zimmermann, L.: Experimental and modelling study of a dual-layer NH3 slip monolith catalyst for automotive SCR aftertreatment systems. Top. Catal.
**56**, 227–231 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 19.Oh, S.H., Bissett, E.J., Battiston, P.A.: Mathematical modeling of electrically heated monolith converters: model formulation, numerical method, and experimental verification. I&EC research.
**32**, 1560–1567 (1993)Google Scholar - 20.Zhang, F., Hayes, R.E., Kolaczkowski, S.T.: A new technique to measure the effective diffusivity in a catalytic monolith washcoat. Chem Eng Research and Design.
**82**, 481–489 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 21.Holder, R., Bollig, M., Anderson, D.R., Hochmuth, J.K.: A discussion on transport phenomena and three-way kinetics of monolithic converters. Chem. Eng. Sci.
**61**(24), 8010–8027 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 22.Sampara, C.S., Bissett, E.J., Chmielewski, M.: Global kinetics for a commercial diesel oxidation catalyst with two exhaust hydrocarbons. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
**47**, 311–322 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 23.Chatterjee, D., Burkhardt, T., Weibel, M., Nova, I., Grossale, A., Tronconi, E.: Numerical simulation of zeolite- and v-based SCR catalytic converters. SAE 2007–01-1136 (2007)Google Scholar
- 24.Pant, A., Schmieg, S.J.: Kinetic model of NOx SCR using urea on commercial Cu-zeolite catalyst. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
**50**, 5490–5498 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar