Birch E, Wachter S. Growing greener cities. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2008.
Astell-Burt T, Mitchell R, Hartig T. The association between green space and mental health varies across the lifecourse. A longitudinal study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68:578–83.
•• Suppakittpaisarn P, Jiang X, Sullivan W. Green infrastructure, green stormwater infrastructure, and human health: a review. Curr Landscape Ecol Rep. 2017;2:96–110 The authors give a thorough review of the recent literature on health benefits of green infrastructure, with an emphasis on stormwater.
•• Threlfall C, Kendal D. The distinct ecological and social roles that wild spaces play in urban ecosystems. Urban For Urban Green. 2018;29:348–56 An insightful effort to categorize different kinds of “wild” spaces and their uses in urban green spaces.
Kim G. The public value of urban vacant land: social responses and ecological value. Sustainability. 2016;8(5):486.
Zefferman E, McKinney M, Cianciolo T, Fritz B. Knoxville’s urban wilderness: moving toward sustainable multifunctional management. Urban For Urban Green. 2018;29:357–66.
•• Riley C, Perry K, Ard K, Gardiner M. Asset or Liability? Ecological and sociological tradeoffs of urban spontaneous vegetation on vacant land in shrinking cities. Sustainability. 2018;10:2139 A very thorough and wide-ranging overview of the pros and cons of spontaneous vegetation on vacant urban land.
Rupprecht C, Byrne J. Informal urban green-space: comparison of quantity and characteristics in Brisbane, Australia and Sapporo. Japan PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e99784.
Haase D. Urban ecology of shrinking cities: an unrecognized opportunity? Nat Cult. 2008;3(1):1–8.
Pagano M, Bowman A. Vacant land in cities: an urban resource. Cent Urban Metrop Pol. 2000:1–9.
Kremer P, Hamstead Z, McPhearson T. A social–ecological assessment of vacant lots in New York City. Landsc Urban Plan. 2013;120:218–33.
$60 million and counting: the cost of vacant and abandoned properties to eight Ohio cities. Community Research Partners and ReBuild Ohio. 2008. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/59396fee59cc6877bacf5ab5/t/598c8a0559cc689d94d23fc6/1502382604201/rebuild+ohio+executive+summary.pdf. Accessed 2 Aug 2019.
Burkholder S. The new ecology of vacancy: rethinking land use in shrinking cities. Sustainability. 2012;4(6):1154–72.
Sadler R, Pruett N. Mitigating blight and building community pride in a legacy city: lessons learned from a land bank’s clean and green programme. Community Dev J. 2017;52(4):591–610.
Teixeira S, Sing E. Reclaim Northside. Fam Commun Health. 2016;39(3):207–15.
Sims C, Davis B, Kim B. Economic potential of South Knoxville’s urban wilderness. Howard H. Baker Jr. Center for Public Policy. 2015. http://bakercenter.utk.edu/economic-potential-of-south-knoxvilles-urban-wilderness/. Accessed 5 Aug 2019.
Parker J, Zingoni de Baro M. Green Infrastructure in the urban environment: a systematic quantitative review. Sustainability. 2019;11(11):3182.
Carrus G, Scopelliti M, Lafortezza R, Colangelo G, Ferrini F, Salbitano F, et al. Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landsc Urban Plan. 2015;134:221–8.
Dallimer M, Irvine K, Skinner A, Davies Z, Rouquette J, Maltby L, et al. Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. BioScience. 2012;62(1):47–55.
• Wood E, Harsant A, Dallimer M, Cronin de Chavez A, McEachan R, Hassall C. Not all green space is created equal: biodiversity predicts psychological restorative benefits from urban green space. Front Psychol. 2018;9 The authors provide a wide-ranging and thorough discussion of how and perhaps why biodiversity promotes stress relief and other mental health benefits.
Akpinar A, Barbosa-Leiker C, Brooks K. Does green space matter? Exploring relationships between green space type and health indicators. Urban For Urban Green. 2016;20:407–18.
Chiang Y, Li D, Jane H. Wild or tended nature? The effects of landscape location and vegetation density on physiological and psychological responses. Landsc Urban Plan. 2017;167:72–83.
Escobedo F, Clerici N, Staudhammer C, Feged-Rivadeneira A, Bohorquez J, Tovar G. Trees and crime in Bogota, Colombia: is the link an ecosystem disservice or service? Land Use Policy. 2018;78:583–92.
Ghimire R, Ferreira S, Green G, Poudyal N, Cordell H, Thapa J. Green space and adult obesity in the United States. Ecol Econ. 2017;136:201–12.
Jiang B, Li D, Larsen L, Sullivan W. A dose-response curve describing the relationship between urban tree cover density and self-reported stress recovery. Environ Behav. 2016;48(4):607–29.
Kondo M, South E, Branas C, Richmond T, Wiebe D. The association between urban tree cover and gun assault: a case-control and case-crossover study. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;186(3):289–96.
Kühn S, Düzel S, Eibich P, Krekel C, Wüstemann H, Kolbe J, et al. In search of features that constitute an “enriched environment” in humans: associations between geographical properties and brain structure. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1).
Stoltz J, Lundell Y, Skärbäck E, van den Bosch M, Grahn P, Nordström E, et al. Planning for restorative forests: describing stress-reducing qualities of forest stands using available forest stand data. Eur J For Res. 2016;135(5):803–13.
Tyrväinen L, Ojala A, Korpela K, Lanki T, Tsunetsugu Y, Kagawa T. The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: a field experiment. J Environ Psychol. 2014;38:1–9.
Vujcic M, Tomicevic-Dubljevic J. Urban forest benefits to the younger population: the case study of the city of Belgrade. Serbia Foreign Policy Econ. 2018;96:54–62.
Wallner P, Kundi M, Arnberger A, Eder R, Allex B, Weitensfelder L, et al. Reloading pupils’ batteries: impact of green spaces on cognition and wellbeing. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(6):1205.
White M, Pahl S, Ashbullby K, Herbert S, Depledge M. Feelings of restoration from recent nature visits. J Environ Psychol. 2013;35:40–51.
Beil K, Hanes D. The influence of urban natural and built environments on physiological and psychological measures of stress—a pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(4):1250–67.
Cheesbrough A, Garvin T, Nykiforuk C. Everyday wild: urban natural areas, health, and well-being. Health Place. 2019;56:43–52.
Colley K, Brown C, Montarzino A. Restorative wildscapes at work: an investigation of the wellbeing benefits of greenspace at urban fringe business sites using ‘go-along’ interviews. Landsc Res. 2016;41(6):598–615.
Knez I, Ode Sang Å, Gunnarsson B, Hedblom M. Wellbeing in urban greenery: the role of naturalness and place identity. Front Psychol. 2018;9.
McAllister E, Bhullar N, Schutte N. Into the woods or a stroll in the park: how virtual contact with nature impacts positive and negative affect. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(7):786.
Zhang L, Tan P. Associations between urban green spaces and health are dependent on the analytical scale and how urban green spaces are measured. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(4):578.
Schebella M, Weber D, Schultz L, Weinstein P. The wellbeing benefits associated with perceived and measured biodiversity in Australian urban green spaces. Sustainability. 2019;11(3):802.
Van den Berg A, Jorgensen A, Wilson E. Evaluating restoration in urban green spaces: does setting type make a difference? Landsc Urban Plan. 2014;127:173–81.
Weber A, Trojan J. The restorative value of the urban environment: a systematic review of the existing literature. Environ Health Insights. 2018;12.
Kondo M, Morrison C, Jacoby S, Elliott L, Poche A, Theall K, et al. Blight abatement of vacant land and crime in New Orleans. Public Health Rep. 2018;133:650–7.
Branas C, South E, Kondo M, Hohl B, Bourgois P, Wiebe D, et al. Citywide cluster randomized trial to restore blighted vacant land and its effects on violence, crime, and fear. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115(12):2946–51.
Gatersleben B, Andrews M. When walking in nature is not restorative—the role of prospect and refuge. Health Place. 2013;20:91–101.
Ewert A, Chang Y. Levels of nature and stress response. Behav Sci. 2018;8(5):49.
Hofmann M, Westermann J, Kowarik I, van der Meer E. Perceptions of parks and urban derelict land by landscape planners and residents. Urban For Urban Green. 2012;11(3):303–12.
Hoyle H, Hitchmough J, Jorgensen A. All about the ‘wow factor’? The relationships between aesthetics, restorative effect and perceived biodiversity in designed urban planting. Landsc Urban Plan. 2017;164:109–23.
Moyer R, MacDonald J, Ridgeway G, Branas C. Effect of remediating blighted vacant land on shootings: a citywide cluster randomized trial. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(1):140–4.
Busy streets theory: the effects of community-engaged greening on violence. Am J Community Psychol. 2018;62(1–2):101–9.
Kondo M, Hohl B, Han S, Branas C. Effects of greening and community reuse of vacant lots on crime. Urban Stud. 2016;53(15):3279–95.
Wolfe M, Mennis J. Does vegetation encourage or suppress urban crime? Evidence from Philadelphia. PA Landsc Urban Plan. 2012;108:112–22.
Branas C, Cheney R, MacDonald J, Tam V, Jackson T, Ten Have T. A difference-in-differences analysis of health, safety, and greening vacant urban space. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(11):1296–306.
Garvin E, Cannuscio C, Branas C. Greening vacant lots to reduce violent crime: a randomised controlled trial. Inj Prev. 2013;19(3):198–203.
Kim EJ, Miller P. Residents’ perceptions of local brownfields in rail corridor areas in the city of Roanoke: the effect of people’s preconceptions and health concern factors. J Env Plan Mgmt. 2017;60(5):862–82.
South E, Kondo M, Cheney R, Branas C. Neighborhood blight, stress, and health: a walking trial of urban greening and ambulatory heart rate. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(5):909–13.
South E, Hohl B, Kondo M, MacDonald J, Branas C. Effect of greening vacant land on mental health of community-dwelling adults. JAMA Net Open. 2018;1(3):e180298.
Aguilera G, Ekroos J, Persson A, Pettersson L, Öckinger E. Intensive management reduces butterfly diversity over time in urban green spaces. Urban Ecosyst. 2019;22(2):335–44.
Wolch J, Byrne J, Newell J. Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: the challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landsc Urban Plan. 2014;125:234–44.
Astell-Burt T, Feng X, Mavoa S, Badland H, Giles-Corti B. Do low-income neighborhoods have the least green space? A cross-sectional study of Australia’s most populous cities. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1).
• Mathey J, Arndt T, Banse J, Rink D. Public perception of spontaneous vegetation on brownfields in urban areas—results from surveys in Dresden and Leipzig (Germany). Urban For Urban Green. 2018;29:384–92 The authors show that public perception of NGI is critical to acceptance but perception can vary from positive to negative depending on several key factors.
Chen H, Qiu L, Gao T. Application of the eight perceived sensory dimensions as a tool for urban green space assessment and planning in China. Urban For Urban Green. 2019;40:224–35.
Kim M, Rupprecht CDD, Furuya K. Residents’ perception of informal green space: a case study of Ichikawa City, Japan. Land. 7:102–22.