Skip to main content

The effect of ICT development on innovation: evidence from G-20 countries

Abstract

We study the interactions between information and communication technology (ICT) development and innovation in G-20 countries over 1961–2019. We establish whether there is temporal causality between these two variables. Employing the vector error correction modelling (VECM) framework, our findings render a grid of short-run and long-run causal relationships between ICT development and innovation, including long-run unidirectional causality from innovation to ICT development.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Availability of data and material

Data will be made available upon request.

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is weighted-average of all these individual innovation indicators.

  2. 2.

    It is weighted-average of all these individual ICT development indicators.

  3. 3.

    0 and 1/2 indicate absence and one/two co-integrating vector(s) between ICT development and innovation, respectively.

  4. 4.

    With the indication of SLH/DFH/FBH/NEH, representing supply-leading/demand-following/feedback/neutrality hypotheses between ICT development and innovation.

  5. 5.

    With the symptom of SLH/DFH/FBH/NEH.

  6. 6.

    With the likes of SLH/DFH/FBH/NEH.

References

  1. Adamides, E., & Karacapilidis, N. (2020). Information technology for supporting the development and maintenance of open innovation capabilities. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 5, 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arvanitis, S., & Loukis, E. N. (2016). Investing the effects of ICT on innovation and performance of european hospitals: An exploratory study. European Journal of Health Economics, 17, 403–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arvin, M. B., Pradhan, R. P., & Nair, M. (2021). Uncovering interlinks among ICT connectivity and penetration, trade openness, foreign direct investment, and economic growth: The case of the G-20 countries. Telematics and Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101567 forthcoming.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartelsman, E. J., Falk, M., Hagsten, E., & Polder, M. (2019). Productivity, technological innovations and broadband connectivity: Firm-level evidence for ten European countries. Eurasian Economic Review, 9, 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Billon, M., Marco, R., & Lera-Lopez, F. (2017). Innovation and ICT use in the EU: An analysis of regional drivers. Empirical Economics, 53, 1083–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bresnahan, T. F., & Trajtenberg, M. (1995). General purpose technologies “engines of growth”?”. Journal of Econometrics, 65, 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gogokhia, T., & Berulava, G. (2021). Business environment reforms, innovation and firm productivity in transition economies. Eurasian Economic Review, 11, 221–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hawash, R., & Lang, G. (2020). Does the digital gap matter? Estimating the impact of ICT on productivity in developing countries. Eurasian Economic Review, 10, 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Majchrzak, A., & Malhotra, A. (2013). Towards an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 22, 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mokyr, J. (2010). The contribution of economic history to the study of innovation and technical change: 1750–1914. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 1, 11–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nair, M., Pradhan, R. P., & Arvin, M. B. (2020). Endogenous dynamics between R&D, ICT and economic growth: Empirical evidence from the OECD countries. Technology in Society, 62, 101315. forthcoming.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Sullivan, D., & Dooley, L. (2009). Applying innovation. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452274898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pradhan, R.P., Arvin, M.B., Nair, M., Bennett, S.E. and Bahmani, S. (2020a). Some determinants and mechanics of economic growth in middle-income countries: the role of ICT infrastructure development, taxation and other macroeconomic variables. Singapore Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590820500563

  14. Pradhan. R. P., Sarangi, A. K., Maity, C. and Behera, R. R. (2021). ICT infrastructure and economic growth in G-20 countries: new insights from ARDL modelling. Journal of Developing Areas. (forthcoming)

  15. Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Mital, J., & Bahmani, S. (2016). Relationships between telecommunications infrastructure, capital formation, and economic growth. International Journal of Technology Management, 70(2–3), 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Nair, M., & Bennett, S. E. (2017). The innovation- growth link in OECD countries: Could other macroeconomic variables matter? Technology in Society, 51, 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Nair, M., & Bennett, S. E. (2020a). Sustainable economic growth in the European union: the role of ICT, venture capital and innovation. Review of Financial Economics, 38(1), 34–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Nair, M., Bennett, S. E., & Hall, J. H. (2018). The information revolution, innovation diffusion and economic growth: An examination of causal links in European countries. Quality & Quantity, 53(3), 1529–1563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pradhan, R. P., & Sahoo, P. (2020). Are there links between financial inclusion, mobile telephony, and economic growth? Evidence from Indian states. Applied Economics Letter, 28(4), 310–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sarangi, A. K., & Pradhan, R. P. (2021). ICT infrastructure and economic growth: A critical assessment and some policy implications. Decision, 47(4), 363–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to three anonymous reviewers and editor of this journal for helpful comments, which have improved the overall quality of this paper.

Funding

Authors did not receive any funding for this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

First author (RPP) has contributed to drafting, formulation, review of methods, illustrations, calculations, interpretation of data, conceptual layout of the paper, and editing. Second author (AKS) has done review of methods, conceptual layout of the paper, and editing. Third author (AS) has done review of methods, conceptual layout of the paper, and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rudra P. Pradhan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest for the present study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A: Derivation of the composite indices of innovation activities and ICT development, using principal component analysis

Appendix A: Derivation of the composite indices of innovation activities and ICT development, using principal component analysis

The study forms two composite indices for innovation activities and ICT development, henceforth denoted by ‘CII’ and ‘CIC’. This is obtained through principal component analysis (PCA), by means of seven innovation indicators, namely, PAT, TAT, RDE, RDA, TRD, HTE, and STA, and five ICT development indicators, namely, TEL, MOB, INU, INS, and FIB, respectively. The detailed of these variables are listed and defined in the text (see Sect. 2). Three trees are used to have both CII and CIC: (1) organizing data in the identical order to generate an input matrix for the principal components; (2) engaging PCA, eigenvalues, factor loadings, and principal components are resulting; and (3) the principal components are recycled to construct CII and CIC for each country for every year. The comprehensive discussions of these steps to have these indices are available in papers such as Pradhan et al., (2020a, 2020b), and Nair et al. (2020). Tables A.1 and A.2 report the PCA results, while Figs. A.1 and A.2 present the variable loading plots for CII and CIC.

Table A.1 Deriving the innovation activities composite index (CII)
Table A.2 Deriving the ICT development composite index (CIC)
Fig. A.1
figure1

Variable loading plots for deriving CII. PAT is patents- both residents and non-residents, TAT is trademarks- both residents and non-residents, RDE is research and development (R&D) expenditure, RDA is researchers in R&D activities, TRD is technicians in R&D activities, HTE is high-technology export, STJ is scientific and technical journal articles

Fig. A.2
figure2

Variable loading plots for deriving CIC. TEL is telephone landlines, MOB is mobile phones, INU is internet users, INS is internet servers, FIB is fixed broadband

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pradhan, R.P., Sarangi, A.K. & Sabat, A. The effect of ICT development on innovation: evidence from G-20 countries. Eurasian Econ Rev (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-021-00189-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • ICT development
  • Innovation
  • G-20 countries

JEL Classification

  • O38
  • O31
  • O32