India’s comparative advantages in services trade

Original Paper


In the recent decades, India has not only experienced substantial growth in its services trade with the rest of the world but has also become a net exporter of services. Using the annual exports and imports data of 10 disaggregated service items from 2000 to 2013, this paper computes and analyzes various comparative advantage (CA) measures. The analysis reveals that India has had a CA in computer and information services and other business services (that include a wide range of information-intensive services) for the entire sample period. These two service categories together accounted for more than two-thirds of the total commercial services export from India. Furthermore, according to an alternative CA measure that considers intra-industry trade, India seems to have CA over the rest of the world in different services such as travel, communication services, and personal, cultural, and related services as well. This paper further explores the shape and dynamics of the distribution of the CA measures by employing a nonparametric method. The distributional dynamics analysis indicates that India is more likely to lose CA over the rest of the world than to gain dominance from a comparative disadvantage (CDA) position in services trade.


Services trade Comparative advantage (CA) Comparative disadvantage (CDA) Revealed comparative advantage (RCA) Revealed symmetric comparative advantage (RSCA) Trade Balance Index (TBI) India 

JEL classifications

F14 O57 



The authors are grateful to an anonymous reviewer and the Managing Editor of the journal for their comments. A major part of this research was conducted when Nath was a Visiting Professor at the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology—Guwahati (IITG), India, during the 2016–17 academic year. He is grateful to IITG for its hospitality and support. An earlier version of the paper was presented at the 86th Annual Meetings of Southern Economic Association held in Washington, D.C. (USA) in November 2016 and at the School of Economics, University of Hyderabad, India, in April 2017. The authors would like to thank Zachary H. Cohle and other session participants at the conference and Phanindra Goyari and the seminar participants at the university for their valuable comments. The usual disclaimer applies.


  1. Arora, A., & Athreye, S. (2002). The software industry and India’s economic development. Information Economics and Policy, 14(2), 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balance, R. H., Forstner, H., & Murray, T. (1987). Consistency tests of alternative measures of comparative advantage. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(1), 157–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalization and ‘revealed’ comparative advantage. The Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, 33(2), 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balassa, B. (1986). Comparative advantage in manufactured goods: A reappraisal. Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(2), 315–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balasubramanyam, A., & Balasubramanyam, V. N. (1997). Singer, services and software. World Development, 25(11), 1857–1861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2000). Reputation effects and the limits of contracting: a study of the Indian software industry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 989–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Batra, A., & Khan, Z. (2005). Revealed comparative advantage: An Analysis For India and China. ICRIER Working Paper, 168. New Delhi: Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.Google Scholar
  8. Bender, S., & Li, K.W. (2002). The changing trade and revealed comparative advantages of Asian and Latin American manufactured exports. Center Discussion Paper, 843. New Haven: Economic Growth Center, Yale University.Google Scholar
  9. Benedictis, L. D. (2005). Three decades of Italian comparative advantages. The World Economy, 28(11), 1679–1709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bhattacharjee, S., & Chakrabarti, D. (2015). Investigating India’s competitive edge in the IT-ITeS sector. IIMB Management Review, 27(1), 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bugamelli, M. (2001). A Model of Specialization for Italy and the Main European Countries: Homogeneity and Convergence. Bank of Italy Discussion Paper, 402.Google Scholar
  12. Burange, L. G., Chaddha, S. J., & Kapoor, P. (2010). India’s Trade in Services. Indian Economic Journal, 58(2), 44–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carolan, T., Singh, N., & Talati, C. (1998). The composition of U.S.-East Asia Trade and changing comparative advantage. Journal of Development Economics, 57(2), 361–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costinot, A., Donaldson, D., & Komunjer, I. (2012). What goods do countries trade? A quantitative exploration of Ricardo’s ideas. Review of Economic Studies, 79(2), 581–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dalum, B., Laursen, K., & Villumsen, G. (1998). Structural change in OECD export specialisation patterns: De-specialisation and ‘stickiness’. International Review of Applied Economics, 12(3), 423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dash, R. K., & Parida, P. C. (2012). Services trade and economic growth in India: An analysis in the post-reform period. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 4(3), 326–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dash, R. K., & Parida, P. C. (2013). FDI, services trade and economic growth in India: Empirical evidence on causal links. Empirical Economics, 45(1), 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fertö, I., & Hubbard, L. J. (2003). Revealed comparative advantage and competitiveness in Hungarian agri-food sectors. The World Economy, 26(2), 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goswami, A. G., Mattoo, A., & Sáez, S. (2009). Exporting services: A developing country perspective. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  20. Joshi, K., & Mudigonda, S. (2008). An analysis of India’s future attractiveness as an offshore destination for IT and IT-enabled services. Journal of Information Technology, 23(4), 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lafay, J. (1992). The measurement of revealed comparative advantage. In M. G. Dagenais & P. A. Muet (Eds.), International trade modelling (pp. 220–236). London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Laursen, K. (2015). Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization. Eurasian Business Review, 5, 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mandal, R., & Nath, H. K. (2016). Services trade in emerging market economies. In Rajagopal & R. Behl (Eds.) Business Analytics and Cyber Security Management in Organizations (pp. 64–83). Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  24. NASSCOM. (2013). The IT-BPM sector in India: Strategic review 2013. New Delhi: NASSCOM.Google Scholar
  25. Nath, H. K., Liu, L., & Tochkov, K. (2015). Comparative advantages in U.S. Bilateral services trade with China and India. Journal of Asian Economics, 38, 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pailwar, V. K., & Shah, N. R. (2009). Revealed comparative advantages for India in services trade. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 2(2), 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reserve Bank of India (2016). Handbook of statistics on the Indian economy. Accessed 30 Oct 2016.
  28. Sahoo, P., & Dash, R. K. (2014). India’s surge in modern services exports: Empirics for policy. Journal of Policy Modelling, 36(6), 1082–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Veeramani, C. (2008). India and China: Changing patterns of comparative advantage? In R. Radhakrishna (Ed.), India development report 2008 (pp. 145–156). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Wu, Y. (2007). Service sector growth in China and India: A comparison. China: An International Journal, 5(1), 137–154.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Eurasia Business and Economics Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and International BusinessSam Houston State UniversityHuntsvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsSouth Asian UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations