Advertisement

Eurasian Economic Review

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 37–50 | Cite as

Fertility and education investment incentive with a pay-as-you-go pension

  • Masaya Yasuoka
Original Paper
  • 75 Downloads

Abstract

Some reports of the related literature describe examinations of whether a child allowance and the subsidy for education investment can raise fertility and education investment, or not. This paper presents consideration of the pension incentive policy as substitutive policies of a child allowance and a subsidy for education investment in a model of quality and quantity of children. Results of the study reported herein demonstrate that pension incentive policy cannot always increase fertility and the education investment, i.e., the growth rate of the human capital stock. If the pension incentive policy can raise fertility and the growth rate of the human capital stock, then the pension incentive policy plays the roles of a child allowance and a subsidy for the education investment. Otherwise, the pension incentive policy should not be provided in place of the child allowance and the subsidy for education investment. Pension incentive policy effects on fertility and the growth rate of the human capital stock depend on the preference parameters of quality and the quality of children.

Keywords

Fertility Education investment Pension Quality of children Quantity of children 

JEL Classification

H55 J13 J24 

References

  1. Apps, P., & Rees, R. (2004). Fertility, taxation and family policy. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(4), 745–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G. S., Murphy, K. M., & Tamura, R. (1990). Human capital, fertility, and economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 12–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. de la Croix, D., & Doepke, M. (2003). Inequality and growth: why differential fertility matters. American Economic Review, 93(4), 1091–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fanti, L., & Gori, L. (2013). Fertility-related pensions and cyclical instability. Journal of Population Economics, 26, 1209–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fenge, R., & Meier, V. (2005). Pensions and fertility incentives. Canadian Journal of Economics, 38(1), 28–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fenge, R., & Meier, V. (2009). Are family allowances and fertility-related pensions perfect substitutes? International Tax and Public Finance, 16, 137–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferrero, D. M., & Iza, A. (2004). Skill premium effects on fertility and female labor force supply. Journal of Population Economics, 17, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glomm, G., & Ravikumar, B. (1992). Public versus private investment in human capital endogenous growth and income inequality. Journal of Political Economy, 100(4), 818–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. van Groezen, B., Leers, T., & Meijdam, L. (2003). Social security and endogenous fertility: pensions and child allowances as siamese twins. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kolmar, M. (1997). Intergenerational redistribution in a small open economy with endogenous fertility. Journal of Population Economics, 10, 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Meier, V., & Wrede, M. (2010). Pension, fertility and education. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 9(1), 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Oshio, T. (2001). Child-care reform in pension system and the fertility rate. Quarterly of Social Security Research, 36(4), 535–546 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  13. Wigger, B. U. (1999). Pay-as-you-go financed public pensions in a model of endogenous growth and fertility. Journal of Population Economics, 12, 625–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Yasuoka, M., & Goto, N. (2015). How is the child allowance to be financed? By income tax or consumption tax? International Review of Economics, 62(3), 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yasuoka, M., & Miyake, A. (2010). Change in the transition of the fertility rate. Economics Letters, 106(2), 78–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhang, J. (1997). Fertility, growth, and public investments in children. Canadian Journal of Economics, 30(4), 835–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhang, J., & Casagrande, R. (1998). Fertility, growth, and flat-rate taxation for education subsidies. Economics Letters, 60(2), 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang, J., & Nishimura, K. (1993). The old-age security hypothesis revisited. Journal of Development Economics, 41(1), 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Eurasia Business and Economics Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin UniversityNishinomiyaJapan

Personalised recommendations