Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling and forecasting Hang Seng index volatility with day-of-week effect, spillover effect based on ARIMA and HAR

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Eurasian Economic Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates whether implied volatility index can be predicted and whether the prediction of implied volatility index can improve option trading performances by checking Hang Seng Index Volatility (VHSI). The results indicate that VHSI can be predicted more accurately when considering day-of-week effect and spillover effect. Furthermore, this paper uses straddle to examine the trading performance with the real data from Hong Kong option trading market. The results suggest that option trading based on the prediction of VHSI can generate extra returns, and model specifications with day-of-week and spillover effects perform better than ones without these two effects. The results also suggest that the prediction of VHSI adds value to practical investors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This paper set the first sample period to start from Jan 2003 with the consideration of 9/11 terrorist attack. During that period the political crisis was huge in United States which impacted the financial markets of the whole world. The fluctuation of stock market is not representative.

  2. The S&P 500 is a free-float capitalization-weighted index of prices of 500 large-cap common stocks actively traded in the United States. The stocks included in the S&P 500 are those of large publicly held companies that trade on either of the two largest American stock market exchanges: the New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ. Different from the Dow Jones index, which focuses on the performance of different industry sectors, Nasdaq is an indicator of performance of stocks of technology and growth companies.

  3. The S&P 500 is a free-float capitalization-weighted index of prices of 500 large-cap common stocks actively traded in the United States. The stocks included in the S&P 500 are those of large publicly held companies that trade on either of the two largest American stock market exchanges: the New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ. Different from the Dow Jones index, which focuses on the performance of different industry sectors, Nasdaq is an indicator of performance of stocks of technology and growth companies.

  4. The time difference between opening of the Hong Kong stock market and closure of the New York Stock Market during weekdays is only 5 h.

References

  • Ahoniemi, K. (2008) Modeling and Forecasting the VIX Index. Unpublished working paper.

  • Ahoniemi, K., & Lanne, M. (2009). Joint modeling of call and put implied volatility. International Journal of Forecasting, 25(2), 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, N. P. B., & Whaley, R. E. (2004). Does net buying pressure affect the shape of implied volatility functions? The Journal of Finance, 59(2), 711–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C. & Oozeer, M. C. (2002). Modelling the implied volatility of options on long gilt futures. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 29(1–2), 111–37.

  • Buraschi, A., & Jackwerth, J. (2001). The price of a smile: hedging and spanning in option markets. Review of Financial Studies, 14(2), 495–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., & Lai, K. K. (2013). Examination on the relationship between VHSI, HSI and future realized volatility with Kalman filter. Eurasian Business Review, 3(2), 200–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., & Tai-Leung, C. (2010). A principal-component approach to measuring investor sentiment. Quantitative Finance, 10(4), 339–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corsi, F. (2008). A simple approximate long-memory model of realized volatility. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 7(2), 174–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driessen, J., & Maenhout, P. (2007). An empirical portfolio perspective on option pricing anomalies. Review of Finance, 11(4), 561–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunis, C., Kellard, N. M., & Snaith, S. (2013). Forecasting EUR–USD implied volatility: the case of intraday data. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(12), 4943–4957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., & Rosenberg, J. V. (2000). Testing the volatility term structure using option hedging criteria. The Journal of Derivatives, 8(1), 10–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J., Ostdiek, B., & Whaley, R. E. (1995). Predicting stock market volatility: a new measure. Journal of Futures Markets, 15(3), 265–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, J. R., & Schwartz, E. S. (1991). The stochastic behaviour of market variance implied in the prices of index options. The Economic Journal, 101(409), 1460–1475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giot, P. (2005a). Implied volatility indexes and daily value at risk models. The Journal of Derivatives, 12(4), 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giot, P. (2005b). Relationships between implied volatility indexes and stock index returns. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 31(3), 92–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C. R., & Whaley, R. E. (1992). Market volatility prediction and the efficiency of the S&P 100 index option market. Journal of Financial Economics, 31(1), 43–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konstantinidi, E., Skiadopoulos, G., & Tzagkaraki, E. (2008). Can the evolution of implied volatility be forecasted? Evidence from European and US implied volatility indices. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(11), 2401–2411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le, C. & David, D. (2014) Asset price volatility and financial contagion: analysis using the MS-VAR framework. Eurasian Economic Review, 4(2), 1–30.

  • Low, C. (2004). The fear and exuberance from implied volatility of S&P 100 index options. The Journal of Business, 77(3), 527–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, U. A., Dacorogna, M. M., Davé, R., Pictet, O. V., Olsen, R. B., & Ward, J. (1995). Fractals and intrinsic time: a challenge to econometricians. Olsen and Associates preprint, 3, 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni, S. X., Pan, J., & Poteshman, A. M. (2008). Volatility information trading in the option market. The Journal of Finance, 63(3), 1059–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noh, J., Engle, R. F., & Kane, A. (1994). Forecasting volatility and option prices of the S&P 500 index. The Journal of Derivatives, 2(1), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poon, S. H., & Pope, P. (2002). Trading volatility spreads: a test of index option market efficiency. European Financial Management, 6(2), 235–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, D. P. (2003). The Nasdaq volatility index during and after the bubble. The Journal of Derivatives, 11(2), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siriopoulos, C. & Fassas, A. (2008). The Information Content of VFTSE. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1307702

  • Tanai, Y. & Lin, K.-P. (2013). Mongolian and world equity markets: volatilities and correlations. Eurasian Economic Review, 4(1), 136–64.

  • Whaley, R. E. (2000). The investor fear gauge. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 26(3), 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are particularly grateful to two anonymous referees, Dr. Hakan Danis and Merve Aricilar, editors of Eurasian Economic Review, for their constructive comments on the final version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanhui Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Lai, K.K. & Du, J. Modeling and forecasting Hang Seng index volatility with day-of-week effect, spillover effect based on ARIMA and HAR. Eurasian Econ Rev 4, 113–132 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-015-0013-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-015-0013-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation