Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Family ownership, control, and firm performance: Does gender diversity matter?

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Eurasian Business Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of family ownership and family control on firm performance while considering the moderating effect of gender diversity. Utilising a dataset of 226 nonfinancial firms listed on Pakistan Stock Exchange spanning from 2008 to 2019, the paper employs the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimation to test the proposed hypotheses. Additionally, the paper uses ordinary least squares regression (OLS) analysis, industry-adjusted measures of firm performance, difference-in-difference (DID) estimation, and Blau and Shannon index to confirm the results. The findings indicate that family ownership and control positively affect firm performance. This relationship is further enhanced by the presence of female directors on the board. Using the agency theory and stewardship theory frameworks, the paper delves into the dynamics of agency conflict and family owner behavior within family firms, highlighting the role of gender-diverse boards. Overall, the analysis reveals that family owners, motivated by a strong attachment to their businesses and a desire to preserve socio-emotional wealth, tend to adopt a stewardship role, thereby mitigating principal-principal conflicts within our sample firms. The study contributes to the literature on family businesses by elucidating the behavior of such firms within an emerging economy context and revealing the role of gender diversity in the presence of family ownership. The findings suggest useful implications for investors regarding the positive influence of family owners on firm performance and underscore the importance for policymakers to prioritize female career development and professional growth. This, in turn, can yield economic benefits through the integration of female directors in boardrooms, thereby reducing agency costs and enhancing overall governance structures within firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ain, Q. U., Yuan, X., Javaid, H. M., Usman, M., & Haris, M. (2020). Female directors and agency costs: evidence from Chinese listed firms. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(8), 1604–1633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ain, Q. U., Yuan, X., Javaid, H. M., Zhao, J., & Xiang, L. (2021). Board gender diversity and dividend policy in Chinese listed firms. SAGE Open, 11(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altaf, N., & Shah, F. A. (2018). Ownership concentration and firm performance in Indian firms: does investor protection quality matter? Journal of Indian Business Research, 10(1), 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A., Ali, R., & Rehman, R. U. (2023). Departure of giants: Ownership transition in lone-founder owned firms. Management Decision, 61(11), 3361–3384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A., Ali, R., Rehman, R. U., Naseem, M. A., & Ahmad, M. I. (2022). Female presence in corporate governance, firm performance, and the moderating role of family ownership. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 929–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A., Rehman, R. U., Ali, R., & Ntim, C. G. (2021). Does gender diversity on the board reduce agency cost? Evidence from Pakistan. Gender in Management: An International Journal., 37(2), 164–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ararat, M., Aksu, M., & Tansel Cetin, A. (2015). How board diversity affects firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence on channels in controlled firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, S., Hou, W., Sarkar, S., & Talaulicar, T. (2017). Corporate governance challenges in emerging economies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 25(3), 148–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baixauli-Soler, J. S., Lucas-Perez, M. E., Martin-Ugedo, J. F., Minguez-Vera, A., & Sanchez-Marin, G. (2016). Executive directors’ compensation and monitoring: The influence of gender diversity on Spanish boards. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(6), 1133–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, A. E. (2019). Top management team diversity, equality, and innovation: A multilevel investigation of the health care industry. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(3), 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1977). A macrosociological theory of social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 26–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brahma, S., Nwafor, C., & Boateng, A. (2021). Board gender diversity and firm performance: The UK evidence. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(4), 5704–5719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caramanis, C., & Spathis, C. (2006). Auditee and audit firm characteristics as determinants of audit qualifications: Evidence from the Athens stock exchange. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(9), 905–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciftci, I., Tatoglu, E., Wood, G., Demirbag, M., & Zaim, S. (2019). Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Turkey. International Business Review, 28(1), 90–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L. (1990). The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory. Academy of Management Review, 15(3), 369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Y., Jiang, Y., Zhang, X., & Zhou, Y. (2019). Women on boards and bank earnings management: From zero to hero. Journal of Banking & Finance, 107, 105607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federo, R., Ponomareva, Y., Aguilera, R. V., Saz-Carranza, A., & Losada, C. (2020). Bringing owners back on board: A review of the role of ownership type in board governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 28(6), 348–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galve-Górriz, C., & Hernández-Trasobares, A. (2015). Institutional framework, concentration of ownership and results of large family corporations in Latin America and Spain. Corporate Governance, 15(4), 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghalke, A., Haldar, A., & Kumar, S. (2022). Family firm ownership and its impact on performance: evidence from an emerging market. Review of Managerial Science, 17(2), 493–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Larraza-Kintana, M., & Makri, M. (2003). The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 226–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D. N. (2016). Basic econometrics (UK ed.). Boston, USA: McGraw-Hill Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, R., & Marimuthu, M. (2016). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value: Examining large companies using panel data approach. Economics Bulletin, 36(3), 1737–1750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46(6), 1251–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y., & Izumida, S. (2008). Ownership concentration and corporate performance: A causal analysis with Japanese panel data. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(4), 342–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, G., An, Z., & Li, D. (2023). Foreign institutional ownership and corporate risk-taking: International evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 31(2), 260–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, M., & Gul, F. A. (2004). Investment opportunity set, corporate governance practices and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(4), 595–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurkus, A. F., Park, J. C., & Woodard, L. S. (2011). Women in top management and agency costs. Journal of Business Research, 64(2), 180–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouki, M., & Guizani, M. (2015). Outside directors and firm performance: The moderating effects of ownership and board leadership structure. International Business Research, 8(6), 104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Ryan, H. E., Jr. (2022). Founding family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the evolution of family ownership and firm policies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 49, 1391–1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K., Lu, L., Mittoo, U. R., & Zhang, Z. (2015). Board independence, ownership concentration and corporate performance—Chinese evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 41, 162–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., & Li, Y. (2020). Female independent directors and financial irregularities in chinese listed firms: From the perspective of audit committee chairpersons. Finance Research Letters, 32, 101320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-García, I., Basco, R., & Gómez-Ansón, S. (2021). Dancing with giants: Contextualizing state and family ownership effects on firm performance in the Gulf Cooperation Council. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(4), 100373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-García, I., Sacristán-Navarro, M., & Gómez-Ansón, S. (2023). Soft gender diversity regulations for boards of directors: The moderating role of firm ownership and control structure. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 52(1), 93–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maury, B. (2006). Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Western European corporations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(2), 321–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Amore, M. D., Quarato, F., & Corbetta, G. (2022). Family ownership dispersion and dividend payout in family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(3), 100436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirza, H. H., Andleeb, S., & Ramzan, F. (2012). Gender diversity and firm performance: Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 3(5), 161–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtinu, S. (2015). Debt maturity, ownership concentration, and firm efficiency. Economics Bulletin, 35(4), 2610–2616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa, A., Saeed, A., Awais, M., & Aziz, S. (2020). Board-gender diversity, family ownership, and dividend announcement: Evidence from Asian emerging economies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(4), 62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadeem, M. (2020). Does board gender diversity influence voluntary disclosure of intellectual capital in initial public offering prospectuses? Evidence from China. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 28(2), 100–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadeem, M., Gyapong, E., & Ahmed, A. (2020). Board gender diversity and environmental, social, and economic value creation: Does family ownership matter? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1268–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nashier, T., & Gupta, A. (2020). Ownership concentration and firm performance in India. Global Business Review, 24(2), 353–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nekhili, M., & Gatfaoui, H. (2013). Are demographic attributes and firm characteristics drivers of gender diversity? Investigating women’s positions on French boards of directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nekhili, M., Gull, A. A., Chtioui, T., & Radhouane, I. (2020). Gender-diverse boards and audit fees: What difference does gender quota legislation make? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 47(1–2), 52–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T., Locke, S., & Reddy, K. (2015). Ownership concentration and corporate performance from a dynamic perspective: Does national governance quality matter? International Review of Financial Analysis, 41, 148–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poletti-Hughes, J., & Martinez Garcia, B. (2022). Leverage in family firms: The moderating role of female directors and board quality. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(1), 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purkayastha, S., Veliyath, R., & George, R. (2019). The roles of family ownership and family management in the governance of agency conflicts. Journal of Business Research, 98, 50–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruigrok, W., Peck, S., & Tacheva, S. (2007). Nationality and gender diversity on Swiss corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 546–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacristán-Navarro, M., Cabeza-García, L., & Gómez-Ansón, S. (2015). The company you keep: The effect of other large shareholders in family firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(3), 216–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saeed, A., Mukarram, S. S., & Belghitar, Y. (2021). Read between the lines: Board gender diversity, family ownership, and risk-taking in Indian high-tech firms. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(1), 185–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, J., & Selarka, E. (2021). Women on board and performance of family firms: Evidence from India. Emerging Markets Review, 46, 100770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheikh, M. F., Shah, S. Z. A., & Akbar, S. (2018). Firm performance, corporate governance and executive compensation in Pakistan. Applied Economics, 50(18), 2012–2027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, A., & Milgate, G. (2005). Accessing board positions: A comparison of female and male board members’ views. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(6), 847–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solarino, A. M., & Boyd, B. K. (2020). Are all forms of ownership prone to tunneling? A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 28(6), 488–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, P., & Taylor, B. (1993). Maxwell—the failure of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 1(1), 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, N. (2020). Small is beautiful or big is better: How much do industry and family ownership matter in firms of different sizes? European Management Review, 17(4), 977–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarram, S. R., & Adapa, S. (2021). Board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility: Is there a case for critical mass? Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasser, Q. R., & Mamun, A. A. (2017). The impact of ownership concentration on firm performance: Evidence from an emerging market. Emerging Economy Studies, 3(1), 34–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa, T., & Rasheed, A. A. (2010). Family control and ownership monitoring in family-controlled firms in Japan. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 274–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaid, M. A., Wang, M., Abuhijleh, S. T., Issa, A., Saleh, M. W., & Ali, F. (2020). Corporate governance practices and capital structure decisions: The moderating effect of gender diversity. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(5), 939–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellweger, T. M., Nason, R. S., Nordqvist, M., & Brush, C. G. (2013). Why do family firms strive for nonfinancial goals? An organizational identity perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 229–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare no funding support for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lahore Business School, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan

    Ali Amin, Rizwan Ali & Ramiz ur Rehman

  2. Faculty of Business, Sohar University, Sohar, Oman

    Ramiz ur Rehman

  3. Department of Accounting and Financial Management, Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Mudassar Hasan

Authors
  1. Ali Amin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rizwan Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ramiz ur Rehman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mudassar Hasan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mudassar Hasan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amin, A., Ali, R., Rehman, R.u. et al. Family ownership, control, and firm performance: Does gender diversity matter?. Eurasian Bus Rev (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-024-00256-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-024-00256-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation