Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk contagion of bank-firm loan network: evidence from China

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Eurasian Business Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Starting from Chinese A-listed firms’ loan announcements, this research creatively constructs a dynamic, variant-linkage, and more comprehensive banking network in China during 2007 and 2016. Exploiting techniques from the literature on complex networks, we find that China’s banking network exhibits more clustering, more coherence, higher centrality, and even more heterogeneity. Empirical results show that the above network features, especially the heterogeneity of the network, have a great impact on financial systemic risk. A network with higher clustering coefficient, higher coherence, lower centrality, and greater heterogeneity is associated with a lower financial systemic risk. A range of policy measures can be drawn from our results, including macro-prudential policy, increasing network stability, and applying surcharges for systemically important financial institutions so as to minimize financial systemic risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available from the authors upon request.

Notes

  1. In January 2007, the Ministry of Finance officially implemented “The Accounting Standards for Business Enterprises”, which further standardized the financial information disclosure of enterprises.

  2. In 2017, the People’s Bank of China, China Banking Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, China Insurance Regulatory Commission, and China Foreign Exchange Administration jointly published “Guidance on standardizing the asset management business of financial institutions” to solicit opinions from the public. The guidance aims to regulate the development of the shadow banking system in China and has critical impact on China’s banking system.

  3. The variance inflation factor (VIF) tests statistics for CC, CO, CN and HN are 5.60, 5.27, 2.25 and 5.15, respectively. According to the rule of thumb for interpreting the VIF, though there is no multicollinearity (i.e., the statistics of VIF is larger than 10) in regression analysis in column (6), variables are moderately or highly correlated with each other.

  4. We retrieve the EPU data from http://www.policyuncertainty.com/scmp_monthly.html.

  5. In the heterogeneity tests, we don’t add all four network structural features into the regression simultaneously for at least two reasons. For one, the focus of this section is the heterogeneity effect of EPU on each network feature-FSI relationship. For another, the correlations between four features may contaminate the heterogeneity effects of EPU.

References

  • Acharya, V. V., & Schnabl, P. (2010). Do global banks spread global imbalances? Asset-backed commercial paper during the financial crisis of 2007–09. IMF Economic Review, 58(1), 37–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adrian, T., & Brunnermeier, M. K. (2011). CoVaR, National Bureau of Economic Research. WORKING PAPER 17454. DOI https://doi.org/10.3386/w17454

  • Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A. L. (2000). Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature, 406(6794), 378–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F., Babus, A., et al. (2009). Financial crises: theory and evidence. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 1(1), 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F., & Gale, D. (2000). Financial contagion. Journal of Political Economy, 108(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F., Qian, J., & Qian, M. (2005). Law, finance, and economic growth in China. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(1), 57–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battiston, S., Puliga, M., Kaushik, R., Tasca, P., & Caldarelli, G. (2012). Debtrank: Too central to fail? financial networks, the fed and systemic risk. Scientific Reports 2 2, Article number: 541.

  • Blume, L., Easley, D., et al. (2013). Network formation in the presence of contagious risk. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation (TEAC), 1(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/2465769.2465771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boss, M., Elsinger, H., et al. (2004). Network topology of the interbank market. Quantitative Finance, 4(6), 677–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Cheng, L., & Lee, C. C. (2022). How does the use of industrial robots affect the ecological footprint? International evidence. Ecological Economics, 198, 107483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Cheng, L., Lee, C. C., & Wang, C. S. (2021). The impact of regional banks on environmental pollution: evidence from China’s city commercial banks. Energy Economics, 102, 105492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T. H., & Lee, C. C. (2020). Spatial analysis of liquidity risk in China. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 54, 101047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eboli, M. (2004). Systemic risk in financial networks: a graph theoretic approach. Universita di Chieti Pescara.

  • Eisenberg, L., & Noe, T. H. (2001). Systemic risk in financial systems. Management Science, 47(2), 236–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freixas, X., Parigi, B. M., & Rochet, J. C. (2000). Systemic risk, interbank relations, and liquidity provision by the central bank. Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 32(3), 611–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gai, P., Haldane, A., et al. (2011). Complexity, concentration and contagion. Journal of Monetary Economics, 58(5), 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gai, P., & Kapadia, S. (2010). Contagion in financial networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 466(2120): 2401–2423.

  • Gong, L., Zhang, J., & Cai, D. (2012). A study on topological structure of bank-firm loan network in listed companies. Statistics & Decision, 7, 158–161. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, A. G., & May, R. M. (2011). Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature, 469(7330), 351–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, A. (2009). Why banks failed the stress test. BIS Review 18: 2009.

  • Harrison, S., Lasaosa, A., et al. (2005). Tiering in UK payment systems: credit risk implications. Bank of England Financial Stability Review, 19, 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1971). Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Comparative Group Studies, 2(2), 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, M. F., & Lee, C. C. (2020). Foreign bank lending during a crisis: the impact of financial regulations. Economic Systems, 44(3), 100791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, J., & Lee, C. C. (2022). A green path towards sustainable development: optimal behavior of the duopoly game model with carbon neutrality instruments. Sustainable Development, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2325.

  • Illing, M., & Liu, Y. (2006). Measuring financial stress in a developed country: an application to Canada. Journal of Financial Stability, 2(3), 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, X. C., Shen, J. H., Lee, C. C., & Cheng, C. (2021). Supply-side structural reform and dynamic capital structure adjustment: evidence from chinese-listed firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 65, 101482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. C., Wang, C. W., & Ho, S. J. (2020). Financial innovation and bank growth: the role of institutional environments. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 53, 101195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. C., Yuan, Z., & Wang, Q. (2022). How does information and communication technology affect energy security? International evidence. Energy Economics, 109, 105969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S., Wang, L., Liu, X., et al. (2020). Systemic risk across the banking sector and the firm sector. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 40(10), 2492–2504. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Lee, C. C., & Li, J. (2021). Structural characteristics and determinants of an international green technological collaboration network. Journal of Cleaner Production, 324, 129258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M., & Lee, C. C. (2021a). Capturing the dynamics of the China crude oil futures: Markov switching, co-movement, and volatility forecasting. Energy Economics, 103, 105622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T. Y., & Lee, C. C. (2021b). Global convergence of inflation rates. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 58, 101501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M., & Lee, C. C. (2022). Is gold a long-run hedge, diversifier, or safe haven for oil? Empirical evidence based on DCC-MIDAS. Resources Policy, 76, 102703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., & Fang, L. (2012). Construction of financial pressure index and its effectiveness test. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 26(3), 1–6. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. (2002). Assortative mixing in networks. Physical Review Letters, 89(20), 208701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nier, E., Yang, J., et al. (2007). Network models and financial stability. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31(6), 2033–2060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2009). The aftermath of financial crises. American Economic Review, 99(2), 466–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J. H., Long, Z., Lee, C. C., & Zhang, J. (2022). Comparative advantage, endowment structure, and trade imbalances. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 60, 365–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strogatz, S. H. (2001). Exploring complex networks. Nature, 410(6825), 268–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upper, C. (2011). Simulation methods to assess the danger of contagion in interbank markets. Journal of Financial Stability, 7(3), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivier-Lirimont, S. (2006). Contagion in interbank debt networks. Unpublished Manuscript.

  • Wang, C. W., Lee, C. C., & Chen, M. C. (2022). The effects of economic policy uncertainty and country governance on banks’ liquidity creation: international evidence. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 71, 101708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen, H., Zhong, Q., & Lee, C. C. (2022). Digitalization, competition strategy and corporate innovation: evidence from chinese manufacturing listed companies. International Review of Financial Analysis, 82, 102166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y., Lee, C. C., Lee, C. C., & Peng, D. (2022). Geographic proximity and corporate investment efficiency: evidence from high-speed rail construction in China. Journal of Banking and Finance, 140, 106510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Zhou, H., & Lee, C. C. (2022). Systemic risk of China’s financial industry during the spread of the COVID-19 epidemic and the breakdown of crude oil negotiation. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(1), 56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Professor Feifei Zhu (Central University of Finance and Economics) for helpful comments and suggestions.

Funding

XX. Hao is grateful to the National Social Science Foundation of China for financial support through Grant No: 20BGL036.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

These authors contributed equally to this study and share first authorship.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chien-Chiang Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent to participate

All authors participated in this article.

Consent to publish

All authors have given consent to the publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally to this study and share first authorship.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hao, Q., Shen, J.H. & Lee, CC. Risk contagion of bank-firm loan network: evidence from China. Eurasian Bus Rev 13, 341–361 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-022-00237-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-022-00237-w

Keywords

JEL classification Codes

Navigation