Skip to main content

Board independence and Chinese banking efficiency: a moderating role of ownership restructuring

Abstract

This study investigates how Chinese banking sector reforms have affected the relationship between banking performance and bank board structure. The study analyzes data from listed commercial Chinese banks between 2000 and 2013, and banking efficiency scores are estimated using the stochastic frontier approach (SFA) and data envelopment analysis (DEA). The impact of board structure and structural reforms on banking efficiency is further analyzed using panel data regression. We find that board independence has a negative influence on banking efficiency, but it becomes positive when the banks are listed on the stock market. This finding confirms the soft-budget constraint theory, which holds that large banks are less efficient than smaller ones as the former can more easily obtain financial support during times of distress. Further, the listing of state-owned banks positively moderates the relationship between board independence and banking efficiency. The study contributes to the literature on banking reforms, board structure, and banking efficiency. It confirms the theoretical basis for Chinese banking reforms and that banking efficiency has improved since the ownership restructuring.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Adams, R., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48, 58–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. B., & Mehran, H. (2012). Bank board structure and performance: Evidence for large bank holding companies. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 21(2), 243–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aebi, V., Sabato, G., & Schmid, M. (2012). Risk management, corporate governance, and bank performance in the financial crisis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(12), 3213–3226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(03), 377–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, S., Jiraporn, P., & Kim, Y. S. (2011). Multiple directorships and acquirer returns. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(9), 2011–2026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asmild, M., & Matthews, K. (2012). Multi-directional efficiency analysis of efficiency patterns in Chinese banks 1997–2008. European Journal of Operational Research, 219(2), 434–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bank Financial Management Strategies for Evaluating Bank Performance. (n.d). Financial Web. http://www.finweb.com/banking-credit/bank-financial-management-strategiesfor-evaluating-bank-performance.html (Retrieved 17 May 2010).

  • Barros, C. P., Chen, Z., Liang, Q. B., & Peypoch, N. (2011). Technical efficiency in the Chinese banking sector. Economic Modelling, 28(5), 2083–2089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P. W., Berger, A. N., Ferrier, G. D., & Humphrey, D. B. (1998). Consistency conditions for regulatory analysis of financial institutions: A comparison of frontier efficiency methods. Journal of Economics and Business, 50(2), 85–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beltratti, A., & Stulz, R. M. (2012). The credit crisis around the globe: Why did some banks perform better? Journal of Financial Economics, 105(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., Hasan, I., & Zhou, M. (2009). Bank ownership and efficiency in China: What will happen in the world’s largest nation? Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(1), 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., Hasan, I., & Zhou, M. (2010). The effects of focus versus diversification on bank performance: Evidence from Chinese banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(7), 1417–1435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bikker, J. A., & Bos, J. W. B. (2005). Trends in competition and profitability in the banking industry: A basic framework (pp. 1–88). Vienna: SUERF (SUERF Studies: 2005/2).

  • Boitan, I. A., & Nitescu, D. C. (2019). Does corporate governance support efficiency in banking business? Evidence from European systematic banks. Ekonomický Časopis, 65(5), 525–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, J. (2008). A new way to measure competition. The Economic Journal, 118(531), 1245–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boubakri, N., Cosset, J. C., & Saffar, W. (2008). Political connections of newly privatized firms. Journal of Corporate finance, 14(5), 654–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, D. J., Jordan, B. D., & Ritter, J. R. (2003). The quiet period goes out with a bang. The Journal of Finance, 58(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprio, G., & Levine, R. (2002). Corporate governance in finance: Concepts and international observations. Financial Sector Governance. The roles of the public and private sectors (pp. 17–50). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. J., Chiu, Y., Jan, C., Chen, Y. C., & Liu, H. H. (2015a). Efficiency and risk in commercial banks—Hybrid DEA estimation. Global Economic Review, 44(3), 335–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Härdle, W. K., & Li, W. (2015b). Estimation and determinants of Chinese banks’ total factor efficiency: A new vision based on unbalanced development of Chinese banks and their overall risk.

  • Chen, X., Skully, M., & Brown, K. (2005). Banking efficiency in China: Application of DEA to pre- and post-deregulation eras: 1993–2000. China Economic Review, 16(3), 229–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. A., & Siems, T. (2002). X-efficiency in banking: Looking beyond the balance sheet. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 34(4), 987–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., & Naveen, L. (2008). Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 329–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 371–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, L., & Jiang, F. (2009). Ownership decisions in Chinese outward FDI: An integrated conceptual framework and research agenda. Asian Business and Management, 8(3), 301–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Andres, P., & Vallelado, E. (2008). Corporate governance in banking: The role of the board of directors. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(12), 2570–2580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delis, M. D., & Papanikolaou, N. I. (2009). Determinants of bank efficiency: evidence from a semi-parametric methodology. Managerial Finance, 35(3), 260–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, N., Fung, H. G., & Jia, J. (2015). What drives cost efficiency of banks in China? China and World Economy, 23(2), 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, S., Wu, Z., Li, Y., & Jia, C. (2010). Executive compensation, supervisory board, and China’s governance reform: a legal approach perspective. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 35(4), 445–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkens, D. H., Hung, M., & Matos, P. (2012). Corporate governance in the 2007–2008 financial crisis: Evidence from financial institutions worldwide. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(2), 389–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M., Lin, C., Liu, P., & Wong, S. M. L. (2009). Inside the black box: Bank credit allocation in China’s private sector. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(6), 1144–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, B. B., Hasan, I., Wu, Q. (2002). Do corporate boards affect firm performance? New evidence from the financial crisis. New Evidence from the Financial Crisis (April 12, 2012) Bank of Finland Research Discussion Paper (11).

  • Fries, S., & Taci, A. (2005). Cost efficiency of banks in transition: Evidence from 289 banks in 15 post-communist countries. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29(1), 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Z., Pessarossi, P., & Weill, L. (2012). Is bank competition detrimental to efficiency? Evidence from China. BOFIT Discussion Papers, 2012(31), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fungáčová, Z., Pessarossi, P., & Weill, L. (2013). Is bank competition detrimental to efficiency? Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 27, 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Herrero, A., Gavilá, S., & Santabárbara, D. (2009). What explains the low profitability of Chinese banks? Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(11), 2080–2092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove, H., Patelli, L., Victoravich, L. M., & Xu, P. (2011). Corporate governance and performance in the wake of the financial crisis: Evidence from US commercial banks. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(5), 418–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardwick, P., Adams, M., & Zou, H. (2011). Board characteristics and profit efficiency in the United Kingdom life insurance industry. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 38(7–8), 987–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (2008). A theory of board control and size. Review of Financial Studies, 21(4), 1797–1832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, I., & Marton, K. (2003). Development and efficiency of the banking sector in a transitional economy: Hungarian experience. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27(12), 2249–2271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston, J. F., Lin, C., & Ma, Y. (2012). Regulatory arbitrage and international bank flows. The Journal of Finance, 67(5), 1845–1895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huibers, F. E. (2005). Initial public offerings. In G. Caprio, J. L. Fiechter, R. Litan, & M. Pomerleano (Eds.), The future of state-owned financial institutions (pp. 315–344). Brookings: Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. (1983). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes.

  • Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, C., Yao, S., & Feng, G. (2013). Bank ownership, privatization, and performance: Evidence from a transition country. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(9), 3364–3372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, C. X., Yao, S. J., & Zhang, Z. Y. (2009). The effects of governance changes on bank efficiency in China: A stochastic distance function approach. China Economic Review, 20(4), 717–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, G. (2009). The corporate governance lessons from the financial crisis. Financial Markets Trends, 96(1), 52–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampe, H. W., & Hilgers, D. (2015). Trajectories of efficiency measurement: A bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuvensteijn, M. V., Bikker, J. A., Rixtel, A. A. R. J. M., & Sørensen, C. K. (2011). A new approach to measuring competition in the loan markets of the euro area. Applied Economics, 43(23), 3155–3167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Q., Xu, P., & Jiraporn, P. (2013). Board characteristics and Chinese bank performance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(8), 2953–2968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, D., & Yao, S. (2010). World financial crisis and the rise of Chinese commercial banks: an efficiency analysis using DEA. Applied Financial Economics, 20(19), 1515–1530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macey, J. R., & O’Hara, M. (2003). The corporate governance of banks. Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggie, F. U. X., & Heffernan, S. (2007). Cost X-efficiency in China’s banking sector. China Economic Review, 18(1), 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux, P., & Linh, H. (2014). Executive compensation, board independence and bank efficiency in China: The effects of the financial crisis.

  • Ning, W. B. Z. (2011). Efficiency and total factor productivity in listed commercial banks in China under the constraint of non-performing loans: An empirical analysis based on SBM directional, distance function. Journal of Financial Research, 1, 110–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunamaker, T. R. (1985). Using data envelopment analysis to measure the efficiency of non-profit organizations: A critical evaluation. Managerial and Decision Economics, 6(1), 50–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxelheim, L., & Randøy, T. (2003). The impact of foreign board membership on firm value. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27(12), 2369–2392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pathan, S., & Faff, R. (2013). Does board structure in banks really affect their performance? Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(5), 1573–1589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porta, R. L., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). Government ownership of banks. The Journal of Finance, 57(1), 265–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, W., Shi, W., & Wang, C. (2011). Board governance and performance of Chinese banks. Banks and Bank systems (Vol. 1).

  • Schaeck, K., & Cihák, M. (2010). Banking competition and capital ratios. European Financial Management, 18(5), 836–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaeck, K., & Cihák, M. (2013). Competition, efficiency, and stability in banking. Financial Management, 43(1), 215–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanmugam, K. R., & Das, A. (2004). Efficiency of Indian commercial banks during the reform period. Applied Financial Economics, 14(9), 681–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, H. D., & Gold, F. (1985). Bank branch operating efficiency: Evaluation with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 9(2), 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soedarmono, W., Machrouh, F., & Tarazi, A. (2013). Bank competition, crisis and risk taking: Evidence from emerging markets in Asia. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 23, 196–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J., Harimaya, K., & Yamori, N. (2013). Regional economic development, strategic investors, and efficiency of Chinese city commercial banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(5), 1602–1611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Y., & Floros, C. (2013). Risk, capital and efficiency in Chinese banking. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 26, 378–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripe, D. (2003). Trends in New Zealand bank efficiency over time. Applied Econometrics and International Development. AEEADE, 3(1), 55–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyay, A., & Sriram, R. (2011). Board size, corporate information environment and cost of capital. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 38(9–10), 1238–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., & Wang, X. (2014). Research on efficiency of listed commercial banks. Paris: Atlantis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W., Wu, C., & Rui, O. M. (2012). Ownership and the value of political connections: Evidence from China. European Financial Management, 18(4), 695–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., Gan, C., & Hu, B. (2015). An empirical analysis of China’s Big four state-owned banks’ performance: A data envelopment analysis. Journal of Banking Regulation, 16(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, B., Rixtel, A., & Leuvensteijn, M. (2014). Measuring bank competition in China: A comparison of new versus conventional approaches applied to loan markets.

  • Yao, S. J., Han, Z. W., & Feng, G. F. (2008). Ownership reform, foreign competition and efficiency of Chinese commercial banks: A non-parametric approach. The World Economy, 31(10), 1310–1326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, S., Jiang, C., Feng, G., & Willenbockel, D. (2007). WTO challenges and efficiency of Chinese banks. Applied Economics, 39(5), 629–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, H., Yang, J., & Mehran, J. (2013). An empirical study of bank efficiency in China after WTO accession. Global Finance Journal, 24(2), 153–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramiz ur Rehman.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

ur Rehman, R., Zhang, J., Naseem, M.A. et al. Board independence and Chinese banking efficiency: a moderating role of ownership restructuring. Eurasian Bus Rev 11, 517–536 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-020-00155-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-020-00155-9

Keywords

JEL Classification