The association between competition power in markets and tax avoidance: evidence from Tehran stock exchange

Original Paper

Abstract

The current research aimed at studying the association between the power of competition in markets and tax avoidance in the companies complied with Tehran stock exchange. To evaluate competition power in the markets, 2 variables are used, namely, Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) and entrance obstacles. The dependent variables in this paper were effective tax rate (ETR) and adjusted non-taxable income. The research sample included 72 companies listed on Tehran Stock Exchange during 2006–2015. To assess the research hypotheses, a multi-variable regression was utilized. The research findings revealed a negative relationship between HHI and the ratio of entrance obstacles on the one hand and ETR on the other hand. Thus, the higher the power of competition in a company was, the more the tax avoidance was found. Also, a significant association was observed between HHI and the adjusted non-taxable income. Finally, no significant relationship was seen between the entrance obstacles and adjusted non-taxable incomes.

Keywords

Tax avoidance Competition power in the market Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) Adjusted non-taxable income 

References

  1. Akdoğu, E., & MacKay, P. (2012). Product markets and corporate investment: Theory and evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(2), 439–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atwood, T. J., Drake, M. S., & Myers, L. A. (2010). Book-tax conformity, earnings persistence and the association between earnings and future cash flows. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(1), 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balakrishnan, K., Blouin, J., & Guay, W. (2012). Does tax aggressiveness reduce corporate transparency? Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  4. Callahan, C. M., & Ryou, J.W. (2013). Is earnings quality associated with product market competition? Working Paper, The University of Louisville and The University of Memphis.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chyz, J., Leung, W., Li, O., & Rui, O. (2013). Labor unions and tax aggressiveness. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(3), 675–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(3), 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, D. A., Dey, A., & Lys, T. Z. (2008). Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre-and post-Sarbanes-Oxley periods. The Accounting Review, 83(3), 757–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, D. A., & Zarowin, P. (2010). Accrual-based and real earnings management activities around seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(1), 2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coles, J. L., Naveen, N. D., & Naveen, L. (2006). Managerial incentives and risk-taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(2), 431–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coppens, L., & Peek, E. (2005). An analysis of earnings management by european private firms. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 14(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dechow, P., & Dichev, I. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77, 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Desai, M., & Dharmapala, D. (2006). Corporate tax avoidance and high powered incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 79, 145–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Desai, M., & Dharmapala, D. (2009). Corporate tax avoidance and firm value. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91, 537–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dhaliwal, D., Huang, S., Moser, W., & Pereira, R. (2011). Corporate tax avoidance and the level and valuation of firm cash holdings. Working paper, The University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  16. Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2010). The effects of executives on corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1163–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P., & Schipper, K. (2004). Cost of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review, 79, 967–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P., & Schipper, K. (2005). The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 39(2), 295–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graham, J., & Tucker, A. (2006). Tax shelters and corporate debt policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 81, 563–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gu, Z., & Wu, J. S. (2003). Earnings skewness and analyst forecast bias. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 35, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2), 127–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanlon, M., Maydew, E., & Shevlin, T. (2008). An unintended consequence of book-tax conformity: A loss of earnings informativeness. Journal of Accounting & Economics., 46, 294–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hanlon, M., & Slemrod, J. (2009). What does tax aggressiveness signal? Evidence from stock price reactions to news about tax shelter involvement. Journal of Public Economics, 93, 126–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoberg, G., Phillips, G., & Prabhala, N. (2014). Product market threats, payouts, and financial flexibility. The Journal of Finance, 69(1), 293–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hou, K., & Robinson, D. (2006). Industry concentration and average stock returns. Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1927–1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Khoddamipour, A., & Amininia, M. (2014). An investigation into the relationship between tax avoidance and cost of debt and the effect of institutional ownership on this relationship. Tax Research, 21(19), 135–155.Google Scholar
  27. Kim, J. B., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. (2011). Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk: Firm-level analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3), 639–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kubic, T., Lynch, D., & Mayberry, M. (2015). Product market power and tax avoidance: Market leaders, mimicking strategies, and stock returns. Accounting Review, 90(2), 675–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(1), 86–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leventis, S., Weetman, P., & Caramanis, C. (2011). Agency costs and product market competition: The case of Audit pricing in Greece. The British Accounting Review, 43, 112–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lisowsky, P. (2010). Seeking shelter: Empirically modeling tax shelters using financial statement information. The Accounting Review., 85, 1693–1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MacKay, P., & Phillips, G. (2005). How does industry affect firm financial structure? Review of Financial Studies, 18(4), 1433–1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Madhavan, A., Richardson, M., & Roomans, M. (1997). Why do security prices change? A transaction-level analysis of NYSE stocks. Review of Financial Studies, 10, 1035–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mafrolla, E., & D’Amico, E. (2016). Tax aggressiveness in family firms and the non-linear entrenchment Effect. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7, 178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mayberry, M., McGuire, S., & Omer, T. (2013). Smoothness and the Information Content of Taxable Income. Working paper, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
  36. Opler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stultz, R., & Williamson, R. (1999). The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 52, 3–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peress, J. (2010). Product market competition, insider trading and stock market efficiency. Journal of Finance, 65(1), 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pour-heidari, O., Fadavi, M. H., & Amininia, M. (2014). An investigation on the effect of tax avoidance on the transparency of financial reporting firms listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Economics Research, 14(1), 85–89.Google Scholar
  39. Rajgopal, S., & Shevlin, T. (2002). Empirical evidence on the relation between stock option compensation and risk taking. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(2), 145–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rego, S. O. (2003). Tax-avoidance activities of U.S. multinational corporations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(4), 805–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rego, S. O., & Wilson, R. (2012). Equity risk incentives and corporate tax aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3), 775–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Robinson, J. R., Sikes, S. A., & Weaver, C. D. (2010). Performance measurement of corporate tax departments. The Accounting Review, 85(3), 1035–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), 335–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Salamon, L. M., & Siegfried, J. J. (1977). Economic power and political influence, The impact of industry structure on public policy. American Political Science Review, 71(3), 1026–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shackelford, D. A., & Shevlin, T. (2001). Empirical tax research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1), 321–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1990). Positive accounting theory: a ten year perspective. The Accounting Review, 65(1), 131–156.Google Scholar
  47. Wilson, R. J. (2009). An examination of corporate tax shelter participants. The Accounting Review, 84, 969–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Eurasia Business and Economics Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Baft Higher Education CenterShahid Bahonar University of KermanKermanIran

Personalised recommendations