Advertisement

Eurasian Business Review

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 1–12 | Cite as

Fading hope and the rise in inequality in the United States

  • Jo Ritzen
  • Klaus F. ZimmermannEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

A substantial literature claims that the strong increase in inequality over the last decade in Western industrial countries such as the United States (US) would lead to increasing tensions between different socio-economic groups which might in turn hamper economic growth. The population’s fading hopes regarding the outlook on the future seem to confirm this. This paper qualifies this interpretation using survey data collected by the Pew Research Center for the People covering 1999–2014. Over the first decade, the decline in hope cannot be traced back to the rising inequality. However, recent data from 2014 suggest that inequality is now a major driver of a lower than ever level of hope. Hence inequality is a recent factor, not the driver of the long-term decline in hope.

Keywords

Confidence Ethnicity Hope Human capital Income inequality 

JEL Classification

D31 J15 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Editors and two anonymous referees for many valuable comments and suggestions, Caroline Wehner for able research assistance, Victoria Finn for editorial comments and the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press (PEW) for providing the data.

References

  1. Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2015). Mastering metrics. The path from cause to effect. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ardies, J., De Maeyer, S., Gijbels, D., & van Keulen, H. (2015). Students’ attitudes towards technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(1), 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burgoon, B. (2013). Inequality and anti-globalization backlash by political parties. European Union Politics, 14, 408–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. CBS (2014). CBS News Poll.Google Scholar
  5. Dørup, J. (2004). Experience and attitudes towards information technology among first-year medical students in Denmark: Longitudinal Questionnaire Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 6(1), e10. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.1.e10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008). Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 563–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Genda, Y. (2016). An international comparison of hope and happiness in Japan, the UK, and the US. Social Science Japan Journal, 19(2), 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Graham, C. (2016). Happiness for all?. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gurría, A. (2011). Press release to the publication of the report: OECD (2011). Paris: Mimeo.Google Scholar
  10. Hirschman, A. O., & Rothschild, M. (1973). The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(4), 44–566.Google Scholar
  11. Judt, T. (2010). Ill fares the land. London: Penguin Press HC.Google Scholar
  12. Krugman, P. (1994). The age of diminished expectations. The Washington Post Company.Google Scholar
  13. Lichbach, M. I. (1989). An evaluation of “Does economic inequality breed political conflict?” studies. World Politics, 41(4), 431–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. OECD: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2008). Growing unequal? Income distribution and poverty in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  15. OECD: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). Divided we stand—Why inequality keeps rising. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  16. PEW: Pew Research Center. (2014). U.S. Views of technology and the future. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/04/17/us-views-of-technology-and-the-future/.
  17. PEW: The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. (1999). Methodology. http://www.people-press.org/1999/10/24/methodology-40/.
  18. PEW: The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. (2008). The Chinese celebrate their roaring economy. Washington DC: PEW.Google Scholar
  19. PEW: The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. (2010a). Political and future survey. http://www.people-press.org/category/datasets/pages/12/.
  20. PEW: The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. (2010b). Life in 2050: Amazing science, familiar threats. Public sees a future full of promise and peril. Washington DC: PEW.Google Scholar
  21. Rajan, R. G. (2010). Fault lines: How hidden fractures still threaten the world economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Reich, R. (2010). Aftershock: The next economy and America’s future. New York: English Knopf.Google Scholar
  23. Ritzen, J. M. M., Wehner, C., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2016). Euroskepticism, income inequality and financial expectations. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy., 16(2), 539–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saez, E. (2015). Striking it richer: The evolution of top incomes in the United States. Berkeley: Mimeo. http://eml.berkeley.edu/~saez/saez-UStopincomes-2013.pdf.
  25. Swedberg, R., & Miyazaki, H. (Eds.). (2016). Hope and the economy. Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Eurasia Business and Economics Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Center for European StudiesHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.UNU-MERITMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations