Skip to main content
Log in

A learning-augmented approach to pricing risk in South Africa

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Eurasian Business Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Through application of state-space modelling, the asset pricing model is re-explored. The result is an asset pricing model which tracks the evolution of investor probability beliefs and learning through a Kalman filter. This behaviourally inspired model shows marked improvement over a traditional asset pricing model, with pricing errors being reduced by as much as 41 % over a 16 year period using South African equities data. We find that investors tend to price long-run risk whilst being notably influenced by exposure to lagged market performance. Together, these findings lend support to the hypothesis that investors tend to price risk as a dynamic learning process in an emerging market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adrian, T., & Franzoni, F. (2009). Learning about beta: Time-varying factor loadings, expected returns, and the conditional CAPM. The Journal of Empirical Finance, 16(4), 537–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artikis, P. G., & Nifora, G. (2011). The industry effect on the relationship between leverage and returns. Eurasian Business Review, 1(2), 125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. (2003). A survey of behavioural finance. In G. M. Constantinides, M. Harris, & R. M. Stulz (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of finance (pp. 1053–1128). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basiewicz, P. G., & Auret, C. J. (2009). Another look at the cross-section of average returns on the JSE. The Investment Analysts Journal, 69, 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basiewicz, P. G., & Auret, C. J. (2010). Feasibility of the Fama and French three factor model in explaining returns on the JSE. The Investment Analysts Journal, 71, 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. Y., & Vuolteenaho, T. (2004). Bad beta, good beta. The American Economic Review, 94(5), 1249–1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., & Lai, K. K. (2013). Examination on the relationship between VHSI, HSI and future realized volatility with Kalman filter. Eurasian Business Review, 3(2), 200–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, N.-F., Roll, R., & Ross, S. A. (1986). Economic forces and the stock market. The Journal of Business, 59(3), 383–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, N.-F., & Zhang, F. (1998). Risk and return of value stocks. The Journal of Business, 71(4), 501–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. E. (2004). Can out-of-sample forecasting comparisons help prevent overfitting. The Journal of Forecasting, 23(1), 115–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commandeur, J. J., Koopman, S. J., & Ooms, M. (2011). Statistical software for state space methods. The Journal of Statistical Software, 41(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E., & French, K. (1992). The cross section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 47, 427–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. The Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1998). Value vs growth: The international evidence. The Journal of Finance, 53(6), 1975–1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, E., & Page, S. (2000). Value and momentum strategies: Evidence from the Johannesburg stock exchange. The Investments Analysts Journal, 51, 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, F. (2009). Idiosyncratic risk and the cross-section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Financial Economics, 91, 24–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetzmann, W. N., & Kumar, A. (2004). Why do individual investors hold under-diversified portfolios? Unpublished working paper, Yale University.

  • Gupta, R., & Modise, M. P. (2013). Macroeconomic variables and South African stock return predictability. Economic Modelling, 30, 612–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. D. (1994). Chapter 50 state-space models. The Handbook of Econometrics, 4, 3039–3080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommes, C. (2001). Financial markets as nonlinear adaptive evolutionary systems. The Journal of Quantitative Finance, 1(1), 149–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, K., & Moskowitz, T. J. (2005). Market frictions, price decay, and the cross-section of expected returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 18, 981–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, P., & Hueng, J. C. (2009). Interest-rate risk factor and stock returns: A time-varying factor-loading model. Applied Financial Economics, 19(22), 1813–1824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jegadeesh, N. (1990). Evidence of predictable behavior of security returns. The Journal of Finance, 45, 881–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, R., & van Rensburg, P. (2008). Evaluating and constructing equity benchmarks in the South African Portfolio management context. Investments Analysts Journal, 67, 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewellen, J., & Nagel, S. (2006). The conditional CAPM does not explain asset-pricing anomalies. The Journal of Financial Economics, 82(2), 289–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mindell, D. A. (2000). Cybernetics: Knowledge domains in engineering systems. Research paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Peeperkorn, J., & Seetharam, Y. (2014). A proposed model to behaviourally pricing risk. Journal of Economic and Behavioral Studies, 6(6), 454–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapach, D. E., Wohar, M. E., & Rangvid, J. (2005). Macro variables and international stock return predictability. International Journal of Forecasting, 21(1), 137–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharot, T., Riccardi, A. M., Candace, R. M., & Phelps, E. A. (2007). Neural mechanisms mediating optimism bias. Nature, 450, 102–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Rensburg, P., & Robertson, M. (2003). Style characteristics and the cross-section of JSE returns. The Investments Analysts Journal, 57, 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassalou, M., & Xing, Y. (2004). Default risk in equity returns. The Journal of Finance, 59(2), 831–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, G., & Bishop, G. (2004). An introduction to the Kalman filter (pp. 1–16). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Computer Science.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yudhvir Seetharam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peeperkorn, J., Seetharam, Y. A learning-augmented approach to pricing risk in South Africa. Eurasian Bus Rev 6, 117–139 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-015-0038-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-015-0038-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation