Advertisement

Eurasian Business Review

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 151–172 | Cite as

The OECD Beveridge Curve: technological progress, globalisation and institutional factors

  • Sergio DestefanisEmail author
  • Giuseppe Mastromatteo
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper tests the existence of a Beveridge Curve across the economies of nineteen OECD countries from 1980 to 2007, investigating the impact of technological progress and globalisation on the unemployment-vacancies trade-off. We find largely favourable evidence for the existence of a OECD Beveridge Curve. Lagged values of technological progress (R&D intensity) shift the Curve outwards, producing evidence in support of the creative destruction effect. Lagged values of a globalisation index also shift the Curve outwards, worsening the unemployment-vacancies trade-off. On the other hand, capital per worker shifts the Curve inwards both in the short and in the long run. Significant institutional variables include coordination bargaining, and, less consistently, unemployment benefits or employment protection. Including in the Curve structural indicators (such as technological progress and globalisation) as well as institutional variables is needed to obtain a satisfactory specification.

Keywords

Unemployment Vacancies Capitalisation effect Creative destruction Labour-market institutions 

References

  1. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1994). Growth and unemployment. Review of Economic Studies, 61, 477–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allard, G. (2005a). Measuring job security over time: In Search of a Historical Indicator, Instituto de Empresa Working Paper, WP 05-17.Google Scholar
  3. Allard, G. (2005b). Measuring The Changing Generosity Of Unemployment Benefits: Beyond Existing Indicators, Instituto de Empresa Working Paper, WP 05-18.Google Scholar
  4. Arpaia, A., Curci, N. (2010). EU labour market behavior during the Great Recession, EU Economic Papers, no. 405.Google Scholar
  5. Blundell, R., Bond, S. R., Windmeijer, F. (2001). Estimation in dynamic panel data models: improving on the performance of the standard GMM estimator. In T. B. Fomby, R. Carter Hill, Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, (Advances in Econometrics, Volume 15), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 53–91.Google Scholar
  6. Booth, A., Burda, M., Calmfors, L., Checchi, D., Naylor, R., & Visser, J. (2000). What do Unions do in Europe? A report. Milan: Fondazione Rodolfo DeBenedetti.Google Scholar
  7. Destefanis, S., Fonseca, R. (2004). Un nuovo approccio alla misura del mismatch: la funzione di produzione. In A. Mocavini and A. Paliotta (Eds.) La domanda di lavoro qualificato in Italia, Franco Angeli, Milan, 234–255.Google Scholar
  8. Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Entorf, H. (2003). Do aggregate measures of mismatch measure mismatch? A time series analysis of existing concepts. EconWPA: Labor and Demography.Google Scholar
  10. Harrigan, J. (1997). Technology, factor supplies and international specialization: estimating the neoclassical model. American Economic Review, 87, 475–494.Google Scholar
  11. Hobijn, B., & Şahin, A. (2013). Beveridge curve shifts across countries since the Great Recession. IMF Economic Review, 61(4), 566–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ICFTU, (1996). The Global Market: Trade Unionism’s Great Challenge, ICFTU 16th World Congress, Brussels.Google Scholar
  13. IMF, (1996). The impact of globalisation on workers and their trade unions.Google Scholar
  14. ISTAT, MARSS Database, http://marss.istat.it/.
  15. Judson, R. A., & Owen, L. A. (1999). Estimating dynamic panel data models: a guide for macroeconomists. Economics Letters, 65(1), 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Koeniger, W., Leonardi, M., & Nunziata, L. (2007). Labour market institutions and wage inequality. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 60(3), 340–356.Google Scholar
  17. Layard, R., Nickell, S., Jackman, R. (1991). Unemployment: macroeconomic performance and the labour market, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mortensen, D. T., & Pissarides, C. A. (1998). Technological progress, job creation and job destruction. Review of Economic Dynamics, 1, 733–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nickell, W. (2006). The CEP-OECD Institutions Data Set (1960–2004), Discussion Paper no.759, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, November.Google Scholar
  20. Nickell, S., & Bell, B. (1995). The collapse in demand for the unskilled and unemployment across the OECD. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 11, 40–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nickell, S., Layard, R. (1999). Labour market institutions and economic performance. In O. Ashenfelter, C. Card (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3 (Amsterdam: North Holland).Google Scholar
  22. Nickell, S., Nunziata, L. (2001). Labour market institutions database. (attached to CEP discussion paper no. 0502).Google Scholar
  23. Nickell, S., Nunziata, L., Ochel, W., & Quintini, G. (2003). The Beveridge Curve, Unemployment and Wages in the OECD from the 1960s to the, 1990s. In P. Aghion, R. Frydman, J. Stiglitz, & M. Woodford (Eds.), Knowledge, information and expectations in Modern Macroeconomics: in honour of Edmund S. Phelps (pp. 394–431). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. OECD (1997). Implementing the OECD jobs strategy: member countries’ experience.Google Scholar
  25. OECD (2004). Wage-setting Institutions and Outcomes, Employment Outlook, Chapter 3.Google Scholar
  26. OECD (various years). Analytical Database.Google Scholar
  27. OECD (various years). Database on unemployment by duration.Google Scholar
  28. OECD (various years). International trade by commodity statistics.Google Scholar
  29. OECD (various years). STAN bilateral trade database.Google Scholar
  30. OECD (various years). STAN database for industrial analysis.Google Scholar
  31. OECD (2009). Main economic indicators.Google Scholar
  32. OECD (2009). Unit Labour Costs Dataset.Google Scholar
  33. OECD various years. Labour market statistics database.Google Scholar
  34. OECD. Stat Extracts, http://stats.oecd.org/.
  35. Pissarides, C. A. (1990). Equilibrium unemployment theory (1st ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Pissarides, C. A., & Vallanti, G. (2007). The impact of TFP growth on steady-state unemployment. International Economic Review, 48(2), 607–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Postel-Vinay, F. (2002). The dynamic of technological unemployment. International Economic Review, 43, 737–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Roodman, D. (2009a). How to do Xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in stata. Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.Google Scholar
  39. Roodman, D. (2009b). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Song, L. L., & Webster, E. (2003). How segmented Are skilled and unskilled labour markets? The case of Beveridge curves. Australian Economic Papers, 42, 332–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Soto, M. (2007). System GMM estimation with a small number of individuals, Institute for Economic Analysis, Barcelona, Mimeo.Google Scholar
  42. Thorpe, V. (1997). Globalisation and Social Policy, Draft ICEM Position Paper.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Eurasia Business and Economics Society 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSEF, DISESUniversità di SalernoFiscianoItaly
  2. 2.Istituto di Politica EconomicaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations