Enhanced Performance of a Monolayer MoS2/WSe2 Heterojunction as a Photoelectrochemical Cathode


Transition-metal dichalcogenide (TMD) semiconductors have attracted interest as photoelectrochemical (PEC) electrodes due to their novel band-gap structures, optoelectronic properties, and photocatalytic activities. However, the photo-harvesting efficiency still requires improvement. In this study, A TMD stacked heterojunction structure was adopted to further enhance the performance of the PEC cathode. A P-type WSe2 and an N-type MoS2 monolayer were stacked layer-by-layer to build a ultrathin vertical heterojunction using a micro-fabrication method. In situ measurement was employed to characterize the intrinsic PEC performance on a single-sheet heterostructure. Benefitting from its built-in electric field and type II band alignment, the MoS2/WSe2 bilayer heterojunction exhibited exceptional photocatalytic activity and a high incident photo-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE). Comparing with the monolayer WSe2 cathode, the PEC current and the IPCE of the bilayer heterojunction increased by a factor of 5.6 and enhanced 50%, respectively. The intriguing performance renders the MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction attractive for application in high-performance PEC water splitting.


  • A vertical transition-metal dichalcogenide MoS2/WSe2 bilayer heterojunction was built by stacking a P-type WSe2 and an N-type MoS2 monolayer.

  • An in situ measurement method was employed to characterize the intrinsic photoelectrochemical performance on the microscale.

  • The photoelectrochemical current and the incident photo-to-current conversion efficiency of the MoS2/WSe2 bilayer heterojunction increased by a factor of 5.6 and enhanced 50% compared with the monolayer WSe2 cathode.


Hydrogen-based energy is a clean, sustainable, and highly efficient energy resource. Intensive research has been conducted to realize efficient production of hydrogen, and photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting is considered as a promising method [1,2,3,4,5]. A high-performance electrode material that can fully utilize solar energy and efficiently run water redox reactions is the key to PEC application. Recently, transition-metal dichalcogenide (TMD) semiconductors (MoS2, WSe2, WS2, etc.) have been proposed as candidates for PEC electrode materials due to their novel band-gap structures, superior electrochemical properties and low cost [5, 6]. When the thickness of TMDs is varied from bulk to single layer, which become two-dimensional (2D) materials, their band gaps change from indirect (1.0–1.6 eV) to direct (1.6–1.8 eV) [7]. 2D material is a kind of layered material that consists of single or few atomic layers, such as graphene. The 2D material family contains carbon material, TMDs and layered metal oxides, etc. [8]. The change of band gaps allows 2D TMDs to absorb visible light, thus improving the photoconversion efficiency [9,10,11]. Additionally, layered TMDs have high absorption coefficients, permitting the absorption of 5–10% of incident sunlight by monolayer TMD [12]. All these features make layered TMDs attractive materials for solar-driven water-splitting devices.

In the group of TMDs, WSe2 and MoS2 are the choices with the best properties. P-type WSe2 has been identified as an active and promising electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) [13, 14]. Monolayer WSe2 has a direct band gap of ~ 1.65 eV, which corresponds to ~ 750 nm wavelength light, and exhibits a high hole mobility (~ 140 cm2 V−1 s−1) that is suitable for PEC cathodes [13, 15, 16]. Recent reports have demonstrated favorable PEC properties of WSe2. A large-area WSe2 flake Pt-decorating thin film fabricated using a space-confined self-assembled thin film deposition method demonstrated good PEC performance [14].

N-type MoS2 has also been demonstrated to be an active catalyst in photocatalytic reactions [4, 17, 18]. Monolayer MoS2 has a direct band gap of 1.85 eV and an electron mobility of 200 cm2 V−1 s−1 [19]. Yu et al. reported its catalytic activity for hydrogen evolution [20], and Chen et al. and King et al. reported its application using silicon as a photocathode for PEC water splitting [21, 22].

Nevertheless, the PEC efficiency of few-layer or single-layer WSe2 as a photocathode is still limited. To further improve the efficiency, coupling WSe2 with a MoS2 monolayer sheet to form a heterojunction could be an ideal choice. Owing to the suitable band gap and band position of the components, it has been reported that the MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction can be applied as a high-performance pn diode [23] and transistor [24, 25]. As a PEC cathode, the advantages of the TMD heterojunction are that: (1) the built-in field in the depletion layer of the pn junction may accelerate separation of the photo-generated excitons, as well as restrict recombination of the electron–hole pair to improve the PEC performance [26,27,28]; (2) the atom-thin vertical heterojunction could shorten the diffusion distance and rapidly deliver the excitons to the solid–liquid interface for redox reaction [17, 29]; (3) due to the large contact area in the heterojunction, more charge could be efficiently separated simultaneously; (4) an extended region of the visible-light spectrum could be utilized by this MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction.

In this study, we fabricated a 2D MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction PEC cathode and demonstrated its improved PEC performance. A micro-fabrication method is adopted to build a single-sheet stacked bilayer heterostructure. In situ measurement is employed to characterize the intrinsic PEC performance of the micro-heterostructure. The mechanism of enhancement of the PEC characteristics of the 2D heterojunction is also discussed.


We fabricated a single-sheet MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction PEC device on the microscale and adopted an in situ measurement technique to characterize its performance. This is an advance method of characterizing the intrinsic PEC characteristics of heterojunction devices due to the unique material properties of a single sheet. Most of the interference factors such as the grain boundary, defects and inhomogeneity are eliminated in the single-sheet device by using in situ measurement.

Synthesis and Transfer of PEC Cathode Materials

Monolayer WSe2 and MoS2 were firstly synthesized on respective sapphire and SiO2/Si substrate using chemical vapor deposition. The WSe2 and MoS2 sheets were then transferred to the PEC Au cathode on a silicon substrate to form the heterojunction. Specifically, polystyrene (PS) was first spin-coated onto the sapphire substrate and the substrate was then immersed in deionized water. The PS film with the WSe2 sheet was peeled off from the substrate due to its hydrophobicity and then pasted on a bulk polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Using a microscope platform, the WSe2 sheet on PDMS could be located and shifted to the top of the target Au electrode. WSe2 with the PS layer was heated for exfoliation from PDMS and transferred to the Au electrode. Finally, the PS was removed using methylbenzene, leaving the exfoliated WSe2 sheet on the target electrode. The material characteristics were confirmed from the Raman and photoluminescence (PL) spectra (RENISHAW, 532 nm laser, 70 μW incident power) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) (NT-MDT NTEGRA Spectra). The light absorption spectra of monolayer MoS2, WSe2 and MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction were measured by HITACHI U-4100 spectrophotometer.

Fabrication of Devices

The single-sheet PEC device was fabricated using a micro-fabrication and transfer method. A 50 m wide Au thin film was sputtered onto a Si substrate with a 300 nm oxide layer, as the cathode. A WSe2 flake was first transferred onto the Au electrode as the bottom layer of the heterojunction. The MoS2 flake was transferred on top of the WSe2 flake to form a vertical heterojunction (Fig. 1a). Another Au electrode on the other side of the substrate acted as the anode. The gap between the anode and cathode was 1.5 mm. Thereafter, the whole substrate was coated with photoresist, except for the area of the target heterojunction and the Au anode. This ensured that only the heterojunction and Au electrode were exposed to the solution and blocked the background noise. Two Al wires were, respectively, bonded onto the two Au electrode pads to output the PEC signal and connect the external measurement circuit (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1

Schematic of a the MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction and b PEC device and measurement

PEC Measurement

An optical microscope (Olympus BX53) with a high-power mercury lamp (U-RFL-T, 100 W) was used as a PEC measurement platform. The device was steadily fixed on the sample stage of the microscope. The PEC measurement circuit of the device is shown in Fig. 1b. A Keithley 2600 Dual-Channel System Source Meter was used to apply a bias voltage and measure the current. The MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction connected to the negative pole of the power source acted as the cathode, while the Au anode was connected to the positive pole. A droplet of electrolyte (0.5 mol L−1 Na2SO4 solution) was injected to cover the whole device. During the measurement, white light from a mercury lamp, simulating solar power, was used to illuminate the device. The illuminated area was controlled to as small as 0.2 mm in diameter by the pinhole of the microscope. An external voltage was applied to the working electrode and swept from 0 to 1 V (100 mV s−1), and the PEC current was recorded. To evaluate the relation of the PEC current to the visible-light spectrum, monochromatic light was separated from the white light using several optical filters (THORLABS, Optical bandwidth 10 nm). Optical filters were placed into the light path to select a specific wavelength. An optical power meter (GENTEC-EO UNO) was used to measure the incident light power of the different wavelengths, and a spot analyzer was used to confirm the size of the light spot.

Results and Discussion

Raman and PL Spectra of Monolayer Heterojunction

The optical image of the monolayer MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction is shown in Fig. 2a. A triangular MoS2 sheet was stacked on a larger triangular WSe2. These two stacked monolayer sheets formed a vertical heterojunction. The AFM showed that the step heights of monolayer WSe2 on the Au electrode and that of monolayer MoS2 on WSe2 were 0.7 and 0.8 nm, respectively, which confirmed the monolayer thickness of the WSe2 and MoS2 sheet (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2

a Optical image of monolayer MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction (dashed in white triangle). The white dots marked in the optical image are the spots where the spectra are accumulated (scale bar is 30 m). b AFM scanning showing thickness of surface of MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction and line scan profile (scale bar is 4 m). c, d Raman intensity map of the WSe2 E 12g mode (green) and MoS2 E 12g mode (red) in heterostructure, corresponding to black dashed square area in (a) (scale bar is 5 m). e, f Raman and PL spectra of monolayer MoS2 (black line), WSe2 (green line) and MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction (red line). (Color figure online)

The Raman and PL spectra of the mono-MoS2, WSe2, and MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction were acquired to characterize their crystallinity. Figure 2e shows the Raman spectra of the above three materials. Monolayer WSe2 has showed two strong peaks around 250 cm−1 corresponding to the E 12g (in-plane) and A1g (out-of-plane) modes. The Raman B 12g mode at 310 cm−1 was not observed, which confirmed the monolayer sheet structure [30,31,32]. Monolayer MoS2 showed characteristic E 12g and A1g Raman mode signals at 385.0 and 405.6 cm−1, consistent with published reports [33,34,35] (Fig. 2e, black line). The Raman spectrum of the MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction showed all the peaks of single-layer WSe2 and MoS2. The peak intensity of WSe2 was much stronger than MoS2 [35]; therefore the Raman peak intensity of MoS2 obtained in heterojunction looks weaker. Actually, the Raman peak intensity of MoS2 in the heterojunction is the same as that of single-layer MoS2. The Raman mapping is used to further verify the crystal homogeneity of MoS2 and WSe2 in their heterostructure, as shown in Fig. 2c, d. The Raman intensity mapping used the E 12g mode of both WSe2 and MoS2, which the color scale bar represents the intensity, respectively. In the overlapping area, the Raman intensity of WSe2 was stronger. The reason is related to the heterojunction stacking that active the Raman features.

The PL spectrum for monolayer WSe2 in Fig. 2f shows a strong single PL peak around 760 nm, nearly 1.63 eV, corresponding to the “A” exciton peak (Fig. 2e, green line). The strong emission and single symmetric PL peak at ~ 1.60 eV suggest the direct band-gap nature of monolayer WSe2 [33, 35, 36]. It is reported that the PL spectrum of multilayer WSe2 shows the “A” exciton peak and an additional broad peak at ~ 885 nm (call as “I” peak), which is attributed to indirect band-gap emission [36, 37]. Single-layer MoS2 showed a peak at 670 nm, nearly 1.85 eV, corresponding to “A” exciton. The PL yield of WSe2 was much higher than that of MoS2, suggesting stronger nonradiative recombination in the latter. The PL peak of WSe2 in heterostructure was about ten times lower than that of the individual WSe2. Such a significant quenching effect indicated that many photo-generated charge carriers were transferred from WSe2 to MoS2 [25, 33, 35, 36].

PEC Performance of Bilayer Heterojunction

The PEC current of single-layer WSe2, MoS2 and the heterojunction immersed in 0.5 mol L−1 Na2SO4 solution was measured under illumination with white light in order to investigate their PEC performance. The PEC current–voltage (JV) curves of the above three materials under illumination are shown in Fig. 3a. MoS2 presented nearly no current response (Fig. 3a, black curve) owing to its intrinsic n-type characteristic. The Fermi level of the n-type semiconductor is higher than the electrochemical potential; hence, electrons will transfer from the semiconductor to the solution until the equilibration is achieved. After that, the bands of n-type semiconductor bend upward, which forms a barrier on the solid–liquid interface and blocks the transport of electrons [5]. This barrier layer hinders its catalytic activity as a PEC cathode. WSe2 presented a better PEC current response to the white light. A current density of 5 A cm−2 was recorded when the potential was swept to 1 V (Fig. 3a, green curve). As a p-type semiconductor, WSe2 [30, 38] is suitable for use as a PEC cathode. Due to its lower Fermi level, the bands of the p-type semiconductor bend downward when it is contacted with electrolyte solution. Without the barrier at the solid–liquid interface, the photo-generated electrons in WSe2 are easier to be driven toward the interface and move into the solution [5]. This bending facilitates the photo-generated electrons to reduce H+ and to transport more efficiently. The PEC current of the WSe2/MoS2 heterojunction (Fig. 3a, red curve) showed a much larger increase than the two aforementioned samples. A PEC current density of up to 28 μA cm−2 at 1 V bias was observed with the heterojunction, which is 5.6 times as large as that of WSe2. This provides initial evidence of the positive effect of the heterojunction on the PEC reaction.

Fig. 3

a PEC current density versus voltage (JV) curves of MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction (red), monolayer WSe2 (green), and monolayer MoS2 (black) under the same white light illumination conditions. b Current response curves for the three samples under 1 V external bias with illumination an interval of 10 s. c PEC currents of monolayer MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction (red dots) and WSe2 (green dots) at different wavelengths. d IPCE of MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction (red dots line) and WSe2 (green dots line). (Color figure online)

The PEC current response curve was constructed for comparison with the visible-light response of the three aforementioned samples (Fig. 3b). The applied voltage was 1 V. All three samples exhibited a fast-optical response when the light was switched between the on and off states. In the light-on state, the decay of the PEC current is caused by the recombination of photo-generated electrons and holes. When illumination was interrupted, the photo-generated electrons at the surface suddenly vanished, and a gradually decline of the current was observed. Under the same illumination and bias conditions, the PEC current density of the MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction was three times as large as that of WSe2. This result is consistent with a former report that the heterojunction performed better than the single-material congeners in the PEC reaction [36, 39, 40].

IPCE of Different Nanosheets

The incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) was measured and calculated for quantitative comparison of the light harvesting efficiency of the WSe2 and MoS2/WSe2 heterojunctions as a function of the wavelength. The IPCE (η) is defined as the ratio of the incident monochromatic photons converted to collected electrons and can be calculated by using Eq. 1

$$\eta = \frac{{_{{\mathop I\nolimits_{\text{ph}} }} }}{P} \times \frac{1240}{\lambda } \times 100\%$$

here Iph (A) is the photocurrent, P (W) is the incident light power, and λ (nm) is the wavelength of light. The IPCE varied with different incident wavelength (λ). As shown in Fig. 3c, the PEC current density of the heterojunction and WSe2 was measured at wavelengths from 400 to 680 nm wavelength at bias of 1 V. The achieved PEC current density was smaller under monochromatic light than that obtained under white light given that the intensity of the monochromatic light decreased when filtered from the white light.

It was found that the heterojunction had a higher (Fig. 3c, red dots) current density in comparison with WSe2 (Fig. 3c, green dots) at all wavelengths. For example, the current density of the heterojunction at 480–500 nm was nearly twice as large as that of WSe2. The corresponding IPCEs of the heterojunction (red dot line) and WSe2 (green dot line) were calculated, as shown in Fig. 3d. Compared to the WSe2 counterpart, the MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction showed an obvious enhancement of the IPCE in the range of 400–680 nm. At 400 nm, the IPCE of the heterojunction exhibited a maximum value of 0.3%, which is 50% higher than that of WSe2. This is attributed to the highest absorption peak of WSe2 around 420 nm [29, 41], and the absorption rate in 400 nm is close to that in 420 nm. In addition, the WSe2/MoS2 heterojunction helps to increase the electron–hole separation efficiency. Therefore, the IPCE was largely improved with the heterojunction. The IPCE of the heterojunction was around 0.1–0.3% at 450–605 nm and decreased with a red-shift of the wavelength due to the reduced absorption of light at higher wavelength.

The light absorption spectra of monolayer MoS2, WSe2 and MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction are shown in Fig. 4, which is consistent with former reports [29, 41,42,43]. The absorption spectrum of monolayer WSe2 (Fig. 4, green curve) possesses 3 peaks at ~ 420, 500, and 600 nm (labeled as D, C, B peak, respectively) in 400–700 nm. The light absorptivity is between 4.5 and 11% and decreases with wavelength. There are two absorption peaks in the absorption spectrum of monolayer MoS2 (Fig. 4, black curve) at ~ 620 and 670 nm (labeled as B and A peak, respectively). The light absorptivity is between 3.5 and 6%. The absorption spectrum of heterojunction (Fig. 4, red curve) is the sum of absorption spectrum of WSe2 and MoS2. The overall absorptivity is 1.5 times that of monolayer WSe2. Because the heterojunction consists of WSe2 and MoS2, it exhibits the absorption characteristics of monolayer WSe2 and MoS2. The peak surrounding at 500 nm in both IPCE of WSe2 and heterojunction is mainly due to the C absorption peak of monolayer WSe2, where more light was utilized. It is remarkable that the IPCE analysis of the heterojunction showed a small peak at 670 nm, compared to that of WSe2. This peak is attributed to the absorption of MoS2 at ~ 670 nm [42, 43]. Thus, the MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction was able to harvest more photons under 670 nm irradiation than WSe2. Meanwhile, the optical absorption of heterojunction can be improved by some means. For example, using nano-metal stripe to introduce surface plasmon resonances [44] or inserting a certain thickness of transparent electrode between heterojunction and back electrode to construct resonance back reflection [45] can further enhance light absorption.

Fig. 4

Absorption spectra of MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction (red curve), monolayer WSe2 (green curve) and monolayer MoS2 (black curve). (Color figure online)

Although monolayer WSe2 has three absorption peaks at 400–700 nm and its absorption gradually decreases from 400 to 700 nm, the peak at 600 nm is relatively weak. MoS2 has an enhanced absorption at ~ 670 nm. Therefore, the IPCE of the heterojunction was the highest at 400 nm and under excitation at the wavelengths of the two other peaks at 500 and 670 nm in the wavelength range of 400–680 nm. Overall, the improvement in the IPCE was mainly attributed to: (1) the pn junction formed between MoS2 and WSe2, which increases the separation of the electron–hole pair; (2) broadening of the range of the solar spectrum absorbed by the stack of MoS2 and WSe2, leading to better utilization of the solar spectrum.

The energy band position of monolayer MoS2 and WSe2 compared with redox potentials of water splitting has shown in Fig. 5a. The relative band position between monolayer MoS2 and WSe2 is decided by their electron affinity. The electron affinity of WSe2 and MoS2 is χW ~ 3.7 eV and χM ~ 4.2 eV [46,47,48], respectively. For the heterojunction, the developed band alignment and built-in potential between p-WSe2 and n-MoS2 help to facilitate separation of the photo-generated exciton, as shown in Fig. 5b. Because MoS2 and WSe2 form a type II band alignment, the conduction band minimum (CBM) and valence band minimum (VBM) of WSe2 are higher than those of MoS2 [35, 36]. Upon irradiation, photons are absorbed and excitons are generated in single-layer WSe2 and MoS2. The photo-generated free electrons in the CBM of WSe2 can be transferred to the CBM of MoS2 owing to the large band offset between WSe2 and MoS2 [35, 36, 42]. Due to the built-in field existing across the stacking facet of WSe2 and MoS2, the photo-induced excitons then relax at the MoS2/WSe2 interface, driving more efficient separation [49]. The electrons then drift to the CBM of MoS2 while the holes drift to the VBM of WSe2. Hence, electrons are collected in the conduction band and transported to the solid–liquid interface. At the interface, the reduction reaction occurs at the surface of MoS2, in which H+ obtains electron to generate H2 (2H+ + 2e− → H2). It is noted that due to the atomic thickness of the ultrathin heterojunction, its built-in field would penetrate to the solid–liquid interface, thus having a positive potential to overcome the barrier on the interface and accelerate the redox reaction. In addition, the ultrathin heterojunction shortens the path for electron transport. The electrons could reach the interface immediately after separation. Therefore, compared with the single-layer material, the heterojunction leads to better utilization of light and furnishes more electrons for the reaction. As a result, a much higher PEC current and a greater IPCE were achieved with the MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction in comparison with WSe2 and MoS2.

Fig. 5

a Energy band position of monolayer MoS2 and WSe2 compared with redox potentials for water splitting. b MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction formed a type II band alignment. When illuminated, photo-generated electrons are transferred from valence band to conduction band and the built-in electric field helps to separate excitons


Monolayer p-type WSe2 and monolayer n-type MoS2 were stacked layer-by-layer to form a heterojunction by using a dry-transfer method. A WSe2/MoS2 heterojunction was fabricated to act as a miniaturized PEC cathode on the micrometer scale. In situ measurement was adopted to investigate the intrinsic PEC characteristics for comparison with the single-material cathode. The PEC current of the heterojunction was 5.6 times than that of the monolayer WSe2 under an external bias of 1 V under illumination with white light. The bilayer heterojunction also exhibited a 50% enhancement in the IPCE relative to the monolayer WSe2 within the visible light range of 400–680 nm. Derived from the type II band alignment formed between MoS2, WSe2 and the ultrathin thickness of the heterojunction, the heterojunction broadened the light harvesting range, improved the photo-induced exciton separation, and accelerated the carrier transport. The unique structure and superior PEC characteristics of the MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction suggest that it holds great promise as a photocathode for the HER with potential for efficient solar energy conversion applications.


  1. 1.

    T. Hisatomi, J. Kubota, K. Domen, Recent advances in semiconductors for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43(22), 7520–7535 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CS60378D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    J. Li, N. Wu, Semiconductor-based photocatalysts and photoelectrochemical cells for solar fuel generation: a review. Catal. Sci. Technol. 5(3), 1360–1384 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CY00974F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    X. Chia, A. Adriano, Z. Sofer, J. Luxa, M. Pumera, Catalytic and charge transfer properties of transition metal dichalcogenides arising from electrochemical pretreatment. ACS Nano 9(5), 5164–5179 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b00501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    X. Chen, Z. Zhang, L. Chi, A.K. Nair, W. Shangguan, Z. Jiang, Recent advances in visible-light-driven photoelectrochemical water splitting: catalyst nanostructures and reaction systems. Nano-Micro Lett. 8, 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-015-0063-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    M.G. Walter, E.L. Warren, J.R. McKone, S.W. Boettcher, Q. Mi, E.A. Santori, N.S. Lewis, Solar water splitting cells. Chem. Rev. 110(11), 6446–6473 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr1002326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    A. Kudo, Y. Miseki, Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38(1), 253–278 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1039/b800489g

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    X. Duan, C. Wang, A. Pan, R. Yu, X. Duan, Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides as atomically thin semiconductors: opportunities and challenges. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44(24), 8859–8876 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cs00507h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    A. Gupta, T. Sakthivel, S. Seal, Recent development in 2D materials beyond graphene. Prog. Mater. Sci. 73, 44–126 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Q.H. Wang, K. Kalantar-Zadeh, A. Kis, J.N. Coleman, M.S. Strano, Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7(11), 699–712 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    D. Jariwala, V.K. Sangwan, L.J. Lauhon, T.J. Marks, M.C. Hersam, Emerging device applications for semiconducting two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. ACS Nano 8(2), 1102–1120 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn500064s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    R. Lv, J.A. Robinson, R.E. Schaak, D. Sun, Y. Sun, Y. Sun, T.E. Mallouk, M. Terrones, Transition metal dichalcogenides and beyond: synthesis, properties, and applications of single- and few-layer nanosheets. Acc. Chem. Res. 48(1), 56–64 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/ar5002846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    M. Bernardi, M. Palummo, J.C. Grossman, Extraordinary sunlight absorption and one nanometer thick photovoltaics using two-dimensional monolayer materials. Nano Lett. 13(8), 3664–3670 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl401544y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    F.R.F. Fan, H.S. White, B.L. Wheeler, A.J. Bard, Semiconductor electrodes. 31. photoelectrochemistry and photovoltaic systems with n- and p-type WSe2 in aqueous solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102(16), 5142–5148 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00536a002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    X. Yu, M.S. Prévot, N. Guijarro, K. Sivula, Self-assembled 2D WSe2 thin films for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production. Nat. Commun. 6, 7596 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    H. Zhou, C. Wang, J.C. Shaw, R. Cheng, Y. Chen et al., Large area growth and electrical properties of p-type WSe2 atomic layers. Nano Lett. 15(1), 709–713 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl504256y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    H.J. Chuang, X. Tan, N.J. Ghimire, M.M. Perera, B. Chamlagain et al., High mobility WSe2 p- and n-type field-effect transistors contacted by highly doped graphene for low-resistance contacts. Nano Lett. 14, 3594–3611 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl501275p

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    J. Li, E. Liu, Y. Ma, X. Hu, J. Wan, L. Sun, J. Fan, Synthesis of MoS2/g–C3N4, nanosheets as 2D heterojunction photocatalysts with enhanced visible light activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 364, 694–702 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.12.236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Z. Yin, B. Chen, M. Bosman, X. Cao, J. Chen, B. Zheng, H. Zhang, Water splitting: Au nanoparticle modified MoS2 nanosheet based photoelectrochemical cells for water splitting. Small 10(17), 3537–3543 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201400124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    B. Radisavljevic, A. Radenovic, J. Brivio, V. Giacometti, A. Kis, Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6(3), 147–150 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn2024557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Y. Yu, S.Y. Huang, Y. Li, S.N. Steinmann, W. Yang, L. Cao, Layer-dependent electrocatalysis of MoS2 for hydrogen evolution. Nano Lett. 14(2), 553–558 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl403620g

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Y. Chen, P.D. Tran, P. Boix, Y. Ren, S.Y. Chiam, Z. Li, K. Fu, L.H. Wong, J. Barber, Silicon decorated with amorphous cobalt molybdenum sulfide catalyst as an efficient photocathode for solar hydrogen generation. ACS Nano 9(4), 3829–3836 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn506819m

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    L.A. King, T.R. Hellstern, J. Park, R. Sinclair, T.F. Jaramillo, Highly stable molybdenum disulfide protected silicon photocathodes for photoelectrochemical water splitting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(42), 36792–36798 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b10749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    T. Roy, M. Tosun, X. Cao, H. Fang, D.H. Lien et al., Dual-gated MoS2/WSe2 van der waals tunnel diodes and transistors. ACS Nano 9(2), 2071–2079 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn507278b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    A. Nourbakhsh, A. Zubair, M.S. Dresselhaus, T. Palacios, Transport properties of a MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction transistor and its potential for application. Nano Lett. 16(2), 1359–1366 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    H. Fang, C. Battaglia, C. Carraro, S. Nemsak, B. Ozdol et al., Strong interlayer coupling in van der waals heterostructures built from single-layer chalcogenides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(17), 6198–6202 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1405435111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    K. Zhang, T. Zhang, G. Cheng, T. Li, S. Wang et al., Interlayer transition and infrared photodetection in atomically thin type-ii MoTe2/MoS2 van der waals heterostructures. ACS Nano 10(3), 3852–3858 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b00980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    A.K. Geim, I.V. Grigorieva, Van der waals heterostructures. Nature 499(7459), 419–425 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    C.H. Lee, G.H. Lee, A.M.V.D. Zande, W. Chen, Y. Li et al., Atomically thin pn junctions with van der waals heterointerfaces. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9(9), 676–681 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/NNANO.2014.150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    K. Wang, B. Huang, M. Tian, F. Ceballos, M.W. Lin et al., Interlayer coupling in twisted WSe2/WS2 bilayer heterostructures revealed by optical spectroscopy. ACS Nano 10(7), 6612–6622 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b01486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    J.K. Huang, J. Pu, C.L. Hsu, M.H. Chiu, Z.Y. Juang et al., Large-area synthesis of highly crystalline WSe2 monolayers and device applications. ACS Nano 8(1), 923–930 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn405719x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    E. Del Corro, H. Terrones, A. Elias, C. Fantini, S. Feng, M.A. Nguyen, T.E. Mallouk, M. Terrones, M.A. Pimenta, Excited excitonic states in 1L, 2L, 3L, and bulk WSe2 observed by resonant Raman spectroscopy. ACS Nano 8(9), 9629–9635 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn504088g

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    B. Liu, M. Fathi, L. Chen, A. Abbas, Y. Ma, C. Zhou, Chemical vapor deposition growth of monolayer WSe2 with tunable device characteristics and growth mechanism study. ACS Nano 9, 6119–6127 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b01301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    P. Tonndorf, R. Schmidt, P. Bottger, X. Zhang, J. Borner et al., Photoluminescence emission and raman response of MoS2, MoSe2, and WSe2 nanolayers. Opt. Express 21(4), 4908–4916 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.004908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    H. Li, J. Wu, Z. Yin, H. Zhang, Preparation and applications of mechanically exfoliated single-layer and multilayer MoS2 and WSe2 nanosheets. Acc. Chem. Res. 47(4), 1067–1075 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/ar4002312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    B. Peng, G. Yu, X. Liu, B. Liu, X. Liang, L. Bi, L. Deng, T.C. Sum, K.P. Loh, Ultrafast charge transfer in MoS2/WSe2 pn heterojunction. 2D Mater. 3(2), 025020 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/3/2/025020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    R. Cheng, D. Li, H. Zhou, C. Wang, A. Yin et al., Electroluminescence and photocurrent generation from atomically sharp WSe2/MoS2 heterojunction pn diodes. Nano Lett. 14(10), 5590–5597 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl502075n

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    W.J. Zhao, Z. Ghorannevis, L.Q. Chu, M.L. Toh, C. Kloc et al., Evolution of electronic structure in atomically thin sheets of WS2 and WSe2. ACS Nano 7(1), 791–797 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn305275h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    N. Flöry, A. Jain, P. Bharadwaj, M. Parzefall, T. Taniguchi et al., A WSe2/MoSe2 heterostructure photovoltaic device. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107(12), 4785–4791 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4931621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Y. Liu, Y.X. Yu, W.D. Zhang, MoS2/CdS heterojunction with high photoelectrochemical activity for H2 evolution under visible light: the role of MoS2. J. Phys. Chem. C 117(25), 12949–12957 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4009652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Z. Huang, W. Han, H. Tang, L. Ren, D.S. Chander, X. Qi, H. Zhang, Photoelectrochemical-type sunlight photodetector based on MoS2/graphene heterostructure. 2D Mater. 2(3), 035011 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/2/3/035011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    M.H. Chiu, M.Y. Li, W. Zhang, W.T. Hsu, W.H. Chang, M. Terrones, H. Terrones, L.-J. Li, Spectroscopic signatures for interlayer coupling in MoS2–WSe2 van der waals stacking. ACS Nano 8(9), 9649–9656 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn504229z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Y. Zhang, M.M. Ugeda, C. Jin, S.F. Shi, A.J. Bradley et al., Electronic structure, surface doping and optical response in epitaxial WSe2 thin films. Nano Lett. 16(4), 2485–2491 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Y. Yu, S. Hu, L. Su, L. Huang, Y. Liu et al., Equally efficient interlayer exciton relaxation and improved absorption in epitaxial and non-epitaxial MoS2/WS2 heterostructures. Nano Lett. 15(1), 486–491 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl5038177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    L. Ju, B.S. Geng, J. Horng, C. Girit, M. Martin et al., Graphene plasmonics for tunable terahertz metamaterials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 630–634 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    J.T. Liu, T.B. Wang, X.J. Li, N.H. Liu, Enhanced absorption of monolayer MoS2 with resonant back reflector. J. Appl. Phys. 115, 193511 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4906398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Y.F. Liang, S.T. Huang, R. Soklaski, L. Yang, Quasiparticle band-edge energy and band offsets of monolayer of molybdenum and tungsten chalcogenides. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 042106 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4816517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    C. Gong, H.J. Zhang, W.H. Wang, L.G. Colombo, R.M. Wallace et al., Band alignment of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides: application in tunnel field effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 053513 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4817409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    M.M. Furchi, A. Pospischil, F. Libisch, J. Burgdörfer, T. Mueller, Photovoltaic effect in an electrically tunable van der Waals heterojunction. Nano Lett. 14(8), 4785–4791 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl501962c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    G.Y. Cao, A.X. Shang, C. Zhang, Y.P. Gong, S.J. Li et al., Optoelectronic investigation of monolayer MoS2/WSe2 vertical heterojunction photoconversion devices. Nano Energy 30, 260–266 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.10.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51290271, 51672314), the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 2016A030313359), the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (Grant No. 201707010224), the Science and Technology Department of Guangdong Province, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, J., Zhang, Y., Chen, H. et al. Enhanced Performance of a Monolayer MoS2/WSe2 Heterojunction as a Photoelectrochemical Cathode. Nano-Micro Lett. 10, 60 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-018-0212-6

Download citation


  • MoS2/WSe2
  • Monolayer
  • Bilayer
  • Heterojunction
  • Photoelectrochemical cathode