An Overview of Special Education Law, 504, FERPA, and Issues Relevant for Pediatric Neuropsychologists

  • Eric E. Pierson
  • Gregory L. Callan
  • Suzanne K. Pierson
Review Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

The article presents an overview of the basic legal framework for special education law and how records are handled at a school. It is important for neuropsychologists working with children and families to understand both the legal mechanisms by which children are able to access educational services as well as supplementary health services that may be available through the school. It is also important that neuropsychologists understand how records provided by schools may be handled so that they can better inform and coordinate with patients. We have organized the current information into strands related to school records, eligibility, and protection from discrimination. Pediatric neuropsychologists may find the concrete suggestions provided at the end of the article helpful when consulting with both families and the schools attended by the students.

Keywords

Student records Eligibility Discrimination 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alice, A., Boley, C., Cavelage, T., Coston, C., et al., (2011). Accommodations manual: selection, use, and evaluation of accommodations that support instruction and assessment of children with disabilities. Retrieved from the Ohio Department of Education website: https://education.ohio.gov/getattachment/Topics/Testing/Special-Testing-Accomodations/Accommodations-on-State-Assessments/Accommodations-Manual-February-2011.pdf.aspx
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth ed.). Arlington: V.A. American Psychiatric Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berninger, V. W. (2011). Evidence-based differential diagnosis and treatment of reading disabilities with and without comorbidities in oral language, writing, and math: prevention, problem-solving consultation, and specialized instruction. In D. P. Flanagan & V. C. Alfonso (Eds.), Essentials of specific learning disability identification (pp. 203–232). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Brown-Chidsey, R., & Steege, M. W. (2010). Response to intervention: Principles and strategies for effective practice. 2nd Edition. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. Civil Rights Division (2014). ADA requirements: testing accommodations. Retrieved from https://www.ada.gov/regs2014/testing_accommodations.pdf
  6. College Board (2016). College board simplifies request process for test accommodations. Retrieved from https://www.collegeboard.org/releases/2016/college-board-simplifies-request-process-for-test-ccommodations
  7. Doll, B., Strein, W., Jacob, S., & Prasse, D. P. (2011). Youth privacy when educational records include psychological records. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(3), 259–268. doi: 10.1037/a0023685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fagan, T. K. (2014). Trends in the history of school psychology in the United States. In P. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: foundations (pp. 383–399). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  9. Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., & Alfonso, V. C. (2013). Essentials of cross-battery assessment (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: a unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13(4), 204–219 http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-LDRP.html.Google Scholar
  11. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2004). Identifying reading disability by responsiveness-to-instruction: specifying measures and criteria. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 27, 216–227 http://journals.sagepub.com/home/ldq.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hale, J., Alfonso, V., Berninger, V., Bracken, B., Christo, C., Clark, E., et al. (2010). Critical issues in response-to-intervention, comprehensive evaluation, and specific learning disabilities identification and intervention: an expert white paper consensus. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 33, 223–236 http://journals.sagepub.com/home/ldq.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacob, S., & Hartshorne, T. S. (2007). Ethics and law for school psychologists (5th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Jacob, S., Decker, D. M., Lugg, E., & T. (2016). Ethics and law for school psychology (7th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Lichtenstein, R. (2014). Best practices in identification of learning disabilities. In P. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: data-based and collaborative decision making (pp. 295–318). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  16. Lyon, G. R., Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Torgensen, J. K., Wood, F. B., et al., (2001). Rethinking learning disaiblities. In G. E. Finn, A. J. Rotherham Jr., & C. R. Hokanson, Jr. (Eds.), Rethinking special education for a new century (pp. 259–287). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Reynolds, C. R., & Shaywitz, S. E. (2009). Response to intervention: ready or not? Or, from wait to-fail to watch-them-fail. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 130–145. doi: 10.1037/a016158.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Sander, J. B., Finch, M. E. H., Pierson, E. E., Bishop, J. A., German, R. L., & Wilmoth, C. (2015). School-based consultation: training challenges, solutions and building cultural competence. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, Special issue: Multicultural training and skills related to consultation. doi: 10.1080/10474412.2015.1042976.Google Scholar
  19. Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2011). Dyslexia. In A. S. Davis (Ed.), Handbook of pediatric neuropsychology (pp. 669–678). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2013). Psychopathology of dyslexia and reading disorders. In A. S. Davis (Ed.), Psychopathology of childhood and adolescence: A neuropsychological approach (pp. 109–126). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) n.d. (20 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 CFR).Google Scholar
  22. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA, 1996). P.L. No. 104–191.Google Scholar
  23. Vellutino, F., Scanlon, D., & Lyon, G. R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: more evidence against the IQ-achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223–238 http://journals.sagepub.com/home/ldx.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Academy of Pediatric Neuropsychology 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.517 Teachers CollegeBall State UniversityMuncieUSA
  2. 2.515 Teachers CollegeBall State UniversityMuncieUSA
  3. 3.One Children’s PlaceSaint Louis Children’s HospitalSt., LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations