Challenges of Emerging Technology: Social Networking and Texting in Pediatric Neuropsychology Practice

Abstract

In today’s digital era, neuropsychologists are likely to use social media and social networking in their clinical work, yet there have been few policies and guidelines on best practices for online behavior of neuropsychologists. Both personal and professional social networking can raise ethical and legal issues in day-to-day practice. These issues relate to privacy and confidentiality, informed consent, blurring of professional boundaries, and searching online for client information. This article examines and discusses potential benefits, risks, and safeguards of digital communication, which includes text messaging, social media, social networking, and other web-based resources. An ethical problem-solving process is presented for neuropsychologists when deciding to use social networking with clients. Further, this article provides strategies and recommendations that graduate trainers, field supervisors, and employers can use to lead discussions on ethical decision-making. Future research and directions in this topic are outlined in light of the ethical issues that neuropsychologists may encounter in professional training and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (2007). Record keeping guidelines. American Psychologist, 62, 993–1004 Retrieved January 21, 2017 from http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/features/record-keeping.pdf.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved September 24, 2016, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx

  3. American Psychological Association (2012). APA social media/forum policy. Retrieved September 24, 2016, from http://www.apa.org/about/social-media-policy.aspx

  4. American Psychological Association. (2013). Guidelines for the practice of telepsychology. Retrieved September 24, 2016, from http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/features/amp-a0035001.pdf

  5. American Psychological Association (2014). Is cloud computing right for your practice? Retrieved January 20, 2017, from http://www.apapracticecentral.org/update/2014/01-30/cloud-computing.aspx

  6. American Psychological Association. (2016). APA social media and mobile apps. Retrieved January 20, 2017, from http://www.apa.org/about/social-media.aspx

  7. Asay, P. A., & Lal, A. (2014). Who’s Googled whom? Trainees’ internet and online social networking experiences, behaviors, and attitudes with clients and supervisors. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 8, 105–111. doi:10.1037/tep0000035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards (2015). Psychology interjurisdictional compact (PSYPACT). Retrieved March 13, 2017 from http://www.asppb.net/page/PSYPACT

  9. Baker, D. C., & Bufka, L. F. (2011). Preparing for the telehealth world: navigating legal, regulatory, reimbursement, and ethical issues in an electronic age. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42, 405–411. doi:10.1037/a0025037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell, S., Chong, S., Ewen, V., Toombs, E., Tzalazidis, R., & Maranzan, K. A. (2016). Social media policy for graduate students: challenges and opportunities for professional psychology training programs. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 57, 202–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Center for Connected Health Policy. (2017). Telehealth policies for all 50 states. Retrieved March 13, 2017 from http://www.cchpca.org/state-laws-and-reimbursement-policies

  12. Clinton, B. K., Silverman, B. C., & Brendel, D. H. (2010). Patient-targeted Googling: the ethics of searching online for patient information. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 18, 103–112. doi:10.3109/10673221003683861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DiLillo, D., & Gale, E. B. (2011). To Google or not to Google: graduate students’ use of the internet to access personal information about clients. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 5, 160–166. doi:10.1037/a0024441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Drum, K. B., & Littleton, H. L. (2014). Therapeutic boundaries in telepsychology: Unique issues and best practice recommendations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45(5), 309–315. doi:10.1037/a0036127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Farnan, J. M., Sulmasy, L. S., Worster, B. K., Chaudhry, H. J., Rhyne, J. A., & Arora, V. M. (2013). Online medical professionalism: patient and public relationships: policy statement from the American College of Physicians and the Federation of State Medical Boards. Annals of Internal Medicine, 158, 620–627. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gabbard, G. O., Kassaw, K., & Perez-Garcia, G. (2011). Professional boundaries in the era of the internet. Academic Psychiatry, 35, 168–174. doi:10.1176/appi.ap.35.3.168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ganster, T., Eimler, S. C., & Krämer, N. (2012). Same same but different!? The differential influence of smilies and emoticons on person perception. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 226–230. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Glancy, G. D., Ash, P., Bath, E. P., Buchanan, A., Fedoroff, P., Frierson, R. L., et al. (2015). “AAPL practice guideline” for the forensic assessment. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 43, S3–S53 Retrieved from http://www.jaapl.org/content/43/2_Supplement/S3.full.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Haas, L.J. & Malouf, J.L. (1989). Keeping up the good work: A practitioner's guide to mental health ethics. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Exchange, Inc.

  20. Huggins, R. (2016). Using mobile phone communication for therapeutic intervention. In S. Goss, K. Anthony, L. S. Stretch, & D. M. Nagel (Eds.), Technology in mental health: Applications in practice, supervision and training. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kaslow, F. W., Patterson, T., & Gottlieb, M. (2011). Ethical dilemmas in psychologists accessing internet data: is it justified? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42, 105–112. doi:10.1037/a0022002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kolmes, K. (2012). Social media in the future of professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 43, 606–612. doi:10.1037/a0028678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Koocher, G. P., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (1998). Ethics in psychology (2 nd ed). New York: Oxford.

  24. Lannin, D. G., & Scott, N. A. (2013). Social networking ethics: Developing best practices for the new small world. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 44, 135–141.

  25. Lehavot, K., Ben-Zeev, D., & Neville, R. E. (2012). Ethical considerations and social media: a case of suicidal postings on Facebook. Journal of Dual Diagnosis, 8, 341–346. doi:10.1080/15504263.2012.718928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lustgarten, S. D. (2015). Emerging ethical threats to client privacy in cloud communication and data storage. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 46, 154–160. doi:10.1037/pro0000018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Massachusetts Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation. (2015). Provision of services via electronic means. Retrieved January 21, 2017, from http://www.mass.gov/ocabr/licensee/dpl-boards/py/regulations/board-policies/provision-of-services-via-electronic-means.html

  28. Myers, S. B., Endres, M. A., Ruddy, M. E., & Zelikovsky, N. (2012). Psychology graduate training in the era of online social networking. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 6, 28–36. doi:10.1037/a0026388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. National Academy of Neuropsychology. (2016). NAN social media policy. Retrieved September 24, 2016, from https://www.nanonline.org/docs/About%20NAN/NAN_Social_Media_Policy.pdf

  30. Pew Research Center. (2013). Health Fact Sheet. Retrieved September 24, 2016 from http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/health-fact-sheet/

  31. Pham, A. V. (2014). Navigating social networking and social media in school psychology: Ethical and professional considerations in training programs. Psychology in the Schools, 51, 767–778. doi:10.1002/pits.21774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pham, A. V., Goforth, A., Segool, N., & Burt, I. (2014). Social networking in school psychology training programs: a survey of faculty and graduate students. School Psychology Forum, 8, 130–143.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pipes, R. B., Holstein, J. E., & Aguirre, M. G. (2005). Examining the personal-professional distinction: ethics codes and the difficulty of drawing a boundary. American Psychologist, 60, 325–334. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.4.325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pirelli, G., Otto, R. K., & Estoup, A. (2016). Using internet and social media data as collateral sources of information in forensic evaluations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 47(1), 12–17. doi:10.1037/pro0000061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Reid, D. J., & Reid, F. J. (2007). Text or talk? Social anxiety, loneliness, and divergent preferences for cell phone use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10, 424–435. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Segool, N. K., Goforth, A. N., Bowman, N., & Pham, A. V. (2016). Social networking practices in school psychology: have moral panic concerns been overstated? Journal of Applied School Psychology, 32, 66–81. doi:10.1080/15377903.2015.1121194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Segool, N. K., Goforth, A. N., White, H., Loschiavo, M., & Gonzalez, A. (2014). Exploratory analysis of school psychologists’ social networking: recommendations for graduate training. Trainers’ Forum, 33, 4–20.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Segool N., Kilanowski-Press, L., Jantz, P., Deni, J., & Hulac, D. (2013). Social media policies for school psychology training programs: issues and considerations. Retrieved January 20, 2017 from https://tsp.wildapricot.org/resources/Documents/Social%20Media%20TSP%20Statement%20Final.pdf

  39. Smith, W. P., & Kidder, D. L. (2010). You’ve been tagged! (then again, maybe not): employers and Facebook. Business Horizons, 53, 491–499. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2010.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Taylor, L., McMinn, M. R., Bufford, R. K., & Chang, K. B. (2010). Psychologists’ attitudes and ethical concerns regarding the use of social networking web sites. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 41, 153–159. doi:10.1037/a0017996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tufekci, Z. (2008). Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 28, 20–36. doi:10.1177/0270467607311484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tunick, R. A., Mednick, L., & Conroy, C. (2011). A snapshot of child psychologists' social media activity: professional and ethical practice implications and recommendations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42, 440–447. doi:10.1037/a0025040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1996). Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Retrieved September 2, 2016 from https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/

  44. Wester, S. R., Danforth, L., & Olle, C. (2013). Social networking sites and the evaluation of applicants and students in applied training programs in psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 7, 145–154. doi:10.1037/a0032376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andy V. Pham.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pham, A.V., Goforth, A.N., Segool, N. et al. Challenges of Emerging Technology: Social Networking and Texting in Pediatric Neuropsychology Practice. J Pediatr Neuropsychol 4, 16–26 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40817-017-0038-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social media
  • Internet
  • Ethics
  • Telehealth
  • Digital communication