Skip to main content
Log in

Research on the Comprehensive Allocation Method for a Vehicle Hydraulic Braking System Based on Partial Fuzzy Ratings and Considering Failure Correlation

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vehicle hydraulic braking systems are widely used, structurally complex. Reliability allocation during the design phase is crucial, yet there is a relatively limited body of research on this subject. In response, a new method for vehicle hydraulic braking system is proposed: the comprehensive reliability allocation method based on partial fuzzy ratings and considering failure correlation (CRA-PFRAFC). Based on the analysis of reliability allocation criteria impacting the braking system, the fuzzy set theory is introduced into the comprehensive allocation method, and the criteria with strong subjective dependence are fuzzy evaluated. The braking system allocation model is established by Gumbel Copula function. According to the set reliability target, the model is solved to allocate the failure rates to each subsystem according to the allocation vector. An example illustrates the advantages of this method. The results show that the reliability of the brake assembly is the lowest, while the reliability of the vacuum booster system is the highest. By fuzzy rating the failure severity and failure occurrence, the subjective quantification problem in traditional method is avoided. Meanwhile, compared with the traditional subsystem independent assumption model, this method is more realistic, and the failure rate of subsystem allocation is increased by 20% on average. Therefore, this study provides necessary and effective theoretical basis for reducing the design and manufacturing costs of vehicle hydraulic braking systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  1. Jegadeeshwaran, R., Sugumaran, V.: Fault diagnosis of automobile hydraulic brake system using statistical features and support vector machines. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 52, 436–446 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dammak, K., Baklouti, A., El Hami, A.: Optimal reliable design of brake disk using a Kriging surrogate model. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 29(28), 7569–7578 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang, Z., Pak, U., Yan, Y., et al.: Reliability-based robust optimization design for vehicle drum brake considering multiple failure modes. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 65(9), 246 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, N., Jiang, G.J., Wu, D.W., et al.: Fatigue reliability analysis of the brake pads considering strength degradation. Eksploat. Niezawodn. 22(4), 620–626 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Romero, J., Queipo, N.V.: An ANOVA approach for accounting for life-cycle uncertainty reduction measures in RBDO: the FSAE brake pedal case study. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 57, 2109–2125 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Forcina, A., Silvestri, L., Di Bona, G., et al.: Reliability allocation methods: a systematic literature review. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 36(6), 2085–2107 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shen, L., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Q., et al.: A reliability allocation methodology for mechanical systems with motion mechanisms. IEEE Syst. J. 16(4), 5596–5607 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Modibbo, U.M., Arshad, M., Abdalghani, O., et al.: Optimization and estimation in system reliability allocation problem. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 212, 107620 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elegbede, A.O.C., Chu, C., Adjallah, K.H., et al.: Reliability allocation through cost minimization. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 52(1), 106–111 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kapur, K.C., Lamberson, L.R.: Reliability in Engineering Design. Wiley, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Advisory Group of Reliability of Electronic Equipment (AGREE): Reliability of Military Electronic Equipment. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense Research and Engineering, Washington, DC (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alven, W.H.: Reliability Engineering: Prepared by ARINC Research Corporation. Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliff, NJ (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karmiol, E.D.: Reliability apportionment. In: Preliminary Report EIAM-5 Task II, pp. 10–22. General Electric, Schenectady, NY (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anderson, R.T.: Reliability Design Handbook. ITT Research Institute, Chicago (1976)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, Y., Yam, R.C.M., Zuo, M.J., et al.: A comprehensive reliability allocation method for design of CNC lathes. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 72(3), 247–252 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng, Q., Liu, X., Wang, W.: An extended interval type-2 fuzzy ORESTE method for risk analysis in FMEA. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 23, 1379–1395 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Itabashi-Campbell, R.R., Yadav, O.P.: System reliability allocation based on FMEA criticality. SAE Technical Paper (2009)

  18. Kim, K.O., Yang, Y., Zuo, M.J.: A new reliability allocation weight for reducing the occurrence of severe failure effects. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 117, 81–88 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yadav, O.P., Zhuang, X.: A practical reliability allocation method considering modified criticality factors. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 129, 57–65 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang, Z., Zhu, Y., Ren, H., et al.: Comprehensive reliability allocation method for CNC lathes based on cubic transformed functions of failure mode and effects analysis. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 28(2), 315–324 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gu, Y., Tang, S.: A fuzzy reliability allocation method for the product based on the knowledge. In: 2010 International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, vol. 1, pp. 101–104. IEEE, (2010)

  22. Xuan, J., Zhao, G., Sun, X., et al.: Task-oriented reliability allocation based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. In: 2018 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-Chongqing), pp. 710–716. IEEE (2018)

  23. Sriramdas, V., Chaturvedi, S.K., Gargama, H.: Fuzzy arithmetic based reliability allocation approach during early design and development. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(7), 3444–3449 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yadav, O.P., Singh, N., Goel, P.S.: Reliability demonstration test planning: A three dimensional consideration. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91(8), 882–893 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xie, L.Y., Xu, J.F., Lin, W.Q.: A complimentary principle for reliability allocation based on load/intensity distribution and related concepts. In: The National Academic Conference on Reliability Technology and Reliability Engineering, pp. 154–158. (In Chinese) (2009)

  27. Zhang, Y., Yu, T., Song, B.: A reliability allocation method of mechanism considering system performance reliability. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 35(7), 2240–2260 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Department of defense. Reliability prediction of electronic equipment. MIL-HDBK-217F, pp. 3–4~3–6, 5–15 (1991)

  29. National military standards of the People's Republic of China. GJB/Z299C-2006 Reliability prediction handbook for electronic equipment (2006)

  30. Lu, L., Huang, H.Z., Wu, B., et al.: Reliability modeling study of in-orbit satellite systems. In: 2009 8th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2009)

  31. Ram, M.: On system reliability approaches: a brief survey. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 4, 101–117 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nelsen, R.B.: Copulas and quasi-copulas: an introduction to their properties and applications. In: Logical, algebraic, analytic and probabilistic aspects of triangular norms, pp. 391–413. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang, M., Wang, Q., Li, Y., et al.: An approach for improvement of avionics reliability assessment based on copula theory. In: The Proceedings of 2011 9th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety, pp. 179–183. IEEE (2011)

  34. Wang, H., Zhang, Y.M., Yang, Z.: A reliability allocation method of CNC lathes based on copula failure correlation model. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 31(1), 1–9 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gargama, H., Chaturvedi, S.K.: Criticality assessment models for failure mode effects and criticality analysis using fuzzy logic. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 60(1), 102–110 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yager, R.R.: A procedure for ordering fuzzy subsets of the unit interval. Inf. Sci. 24(2), 143–161 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang, Y.M., Chin, K.S., Poon, G.K.K., et al.: Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(2), 1195–1207 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yager, R.R.: A characterization of the extension principle. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 18(3), 205–217 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Hu, Z., Huang, J., Yan, Z., et al.: Cooperative-game-oriented optimal design in vehicle lateral stability control with fuzzy uncertainties. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 24, 1–16 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang, H., Zhang, Y.M., Yang, Z.: A risk evaluation method to prioritize failure modes based on failure data and a combination of fuzzy sets theory and grey theory. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 82, 216–225 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the support from Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 52172401), Liaoning Provincial Science and Technology planned project (2022JH2/101300225), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U23B2098).

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52172401, U23B2098), Liaoning Provincial Science and Technology planned project (2022JH2/101300225).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhou Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Z., Bai, H., Wang, H. et al. Research on the Comprehensive Allocation Method for a Vehicle Hydraulic Braking System Based on Partial Fuzzy Ratings and Considering Failure Correlation. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-024-01699-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-024-01699-y

Keywords

Navigation