Advertisement

International Journal of Fuzzy Systems

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 943–957 | Cite as

Generalized Pythagorean Fuzzy Maclaurin Symmetric Means and Its Application to Multiple Attribute SIR Group Decision Model

  • Jindong QinEmail author
Article

Abstract

Pythagorean fuzzy sets, originally proposed by Yager (IFSA world congress and NAFIPS annual meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS), pp 57–61, 2013), which are convenient to describe vagueness and impression in real-world problems, can be regarded as a novel extension of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Generalized Maclaurin symmetric mean comes as an extension of classical Maclaurin symmetric mean. Their prominent feature is that they can both capture overall interrelationships and also focus on individual importance among the arguments. However, the generalized Maclaurin symmetric mean can only be considered for aggregating numeric information. In this paper, we investigate the generalized Maclaurin symmetric mean and further extend to Pythagorean fuzzy environment. We develop the Pythagorean fuzzy generalized Maclaurin symmetric mean (PFGMSM), the Pythagorean fuzzy weighted generalized Maclaurin symmetric mean (PFWGMSM), and discuss a variety of their desirable properties. To better understand the proposed parameterization operators, we provide an innovative way to extend the classical superiority and inferiority ranking (SIR) group decision model to Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Then, an approach formed with the aid of PFWGMSM and SIR to multiple attribute group decision-making with Pythagorean fuzzy information is developed. Finally, an illustrative example concerning supply chain financial risk decision-making is provided to verify the proposed method and demonstrate its effectiveness.

Keywords

Pythagorean fuzzy sets Generalized Maclaurin symmetric mean Pythagorean fuzzy generalized Maclaurin symmetric mean Information granularity Multiple attribute group decision-making Multiple attribute group decision-making 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Project 71701158, MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences (Project No. 17YJC630114), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2017VI010.

References

  1. 1.
    Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20(1), 87–96 (1986)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yager, R.R., Abbasov, A.M.: Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 28(5), 436–452 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang, X.L., Xu, Z.S.: Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 29(12), 1061–1078 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peng, X.D., Yang, Y.: Some results for pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 30(11), 1133–1160 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yager, R.R.: Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS), pp. 57–61 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yager, R.R.: Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22(4), 958–965 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beliakov, G., James, S.: Averaging aggregation functions for preferences expressed as Pythagorean membership grades and fuzzy orthopairs. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 298–305 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reformat, M.Z., Yager, R.R.: Suggesting recommendations using Pythagorean fuzzy sets illustrated using netflix movie data. In: International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, pp. 546–556 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peng, X.D., Yuan, H.Y., Yang, Y.: Pythagorean fuzzy information measures and their applications. Int. J. Intell. Syst. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21880 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garg, H.: A novel correlation coefficients between Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its applications to decision-making processes. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 31(12), 1234–1252 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gou, X.J., Xu, Z.S., Ren, P.J.: The properties of continuous Pythagorean fuzzy information. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 31(5), 401–424 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang, X.L.: Multicriteria Pythagorean fuzzy decision analysis: a hierarchical QUALIFLEX approach with the closeness index-based ranking methods. Inf. Sci. 330, 104–124 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peng, X.D., Yang, Y.: Pythagorean fuzzy choquet integral based MABAC method for multiple attribute group decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 31(10), 989–1020 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ren, P.J., Xu, Z.S., Gou, X.J.: Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM approach to multi-criteria decision making. Appl. Soft Comput. 42, 246–259 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liang, D.C., Xu, Z.S., Darko, A.P.: Projection model for fusing the information of Pythagorean fuzzy multicriteria group decision making based on geometric Bonferroni mean. Int. J. Intell. Syst. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21879 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Garg, H.: A new generalized pythagorean fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations and its application to decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 31(9), 886–920 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Garg, H.: Generalized Pythagorean fuzzy geometric aggregation operators using Einstein t-Norm and t-Conorm for multicriteria decision-making process. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 32(6), 597–630 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peng, X.D., Yang, Y.: Fundamental properties of interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 31(5), 444–487 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peng, X.D., Yuan, H.Y.: Fundamental properties of Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators. Fundam. Inf. 147(4), 415–446 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maclaurin, C.: A second letter to Martin Folkes, Esq.; concerning the roots of equations, with the demonstration of other rules in algebra, Phil. Transactions 36, 59 (1729)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Beliakov, G., James, S.J., Mordelová, J., Rückschlossová, T., Yager, R.R.: Generalized Bonferroni mean operators in multi-criteria aggregation. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 161(17), 2227–2242 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    He, Y.D., He, Z., Chen, H.Y.: Intuitionistic fuzzy interaction Bonferroni means and its application to multiple attribute decision making. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 45(1), 116–128 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xu, Z.S., Yager, R.R.: Intuitionistic fuzzy Bonferroni means. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. 41(2), 568–578 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu, P.D., Chen, S.-M.: Group decision making based on Heronian aggregation operators of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. IEEE Trans. Cybern. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2016.2634599 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Qin, J.D., Liu, X.W.: An approach to intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making based on Maclaurin symmetric mean operators. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 27(5), 2177–2190 (2014)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Qin, J.D., Liu, X.W., Pedrycz, W.: Hesitant fuzzy Maclaurin symmetric mean operators and its application to multiple-attribute decision making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 17(4), 509–520 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ju, Y.B., Liu, X.Y., Ju, D.W.: Some new intuitionistic linguistic aggregation operators based on Maclaurin symmetric mean and their applications to multiple attribute group decision making. Soft. Comput. 20(11), 4521–4548 (2016)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang, Z.H., Wei, F.J., Zhou, S.H.: Approaches to comprehensive evaluation with 2-tuple linguistic information. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 28(1), 469–475 (2015)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Qin, J.D., Liu, X.W.: Approaches to uncertain linguistic multiple attribute decision making based on dual Maclaurin symmetric mean. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 29(1), 171–186 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu, P.D., Zhang, X.: Some Maclaurin symmetric mean operators for single-valued trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers and their applications to group decision making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0335-9 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang, J.Q., Yang, Y., Li, L.: Multi-criteria decision-making method based on single-valued neutrosophic linguistic Maclaurin symmetric mean operators. Neural Comput. Appl. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2747-0 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Detemple, D., Robertson, J.: On generalized symmetric means of two variables. Univ. Beograd. Publ. Elektrotehn. Fak. Ser. Mat. Fiz. 634(672), 236–238 (1979)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Xu, X.: The SIR method: a superiority and inferiority ranking method for multiple criteria decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 131(3), 587–602 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zeng, S.Z., Chen, J.P., Li, X.S.: A hybrid method for pythagorean fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Making 15(2), 403–422 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wei, G.W., Lu, M.: Pythagorean Fuzzy Maclaurin symmetric mean operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21911 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pedrycz, W., Song, M.: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in group decision making and its optimization with an allocation of information granularity. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 19(3), 527–539 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E., Pedrycz, W.: A method based on PSO and granular computing of linguistic information to solve group decision making problems defined in heterogeneous contexts. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 230(3), 624–633 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pedrycz, W.: Granular computing: analysis and design of intelligent systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cabrerizo, F.J., Ureña, R., Pedrycz, W., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Building consensus in group decision making with an allocation of information granularity. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 255, 115–127 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pedrycz, W.: Allocation of information granularity in optimization and decision-making models: towards building the foundations of granular computing. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 232(1), 137–145 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pedrycz, W.: From fuzzy models to granular fuzzy models. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 9(sup1), 35–42 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yager, R.R.: On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 18(1), 183–190 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wang, Y.-M., Luo, Y., Liu, X.W.: Two new models for determining OWA operator weights. Comput. Ind. Engr. 52(2), 203–209 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sang, X.Z., Liu, X.W.: An analytic approach to obtain the least square deviation OWA operator weights. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 240, 103–116 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Taiwan Fuzzy Systems Association and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementWuhan University of TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations