Skip to main content
Log in

A Modified D Numbers’ Integration for Multiple Attributes Decision Making

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For multiple attributes decision making, D numbers theory has been widely used to deal with uncertain and incomplete information. However, the incomplete information is abandoned in the D numbers’ integration representation. This results in unreasonable conclusions in some real-world applications. To overcome this drawback, this paper proposes an improved D numbers’ integration representation method, by effectively allocating the incomplete information into decision making according to the original value of D numbers. The proposed method is applied to assess the performance of different types of motorcycles. The results show that the proposed method can effectively increase both the accuracy and efficiency of assessment when compared with the original D numbers theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xu, Z., Cai, X.: Projection model-based approaches to intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making. In: Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information Aggregation, pp. 249–258. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

  2. Ye, J.: Some aggregation operators of interval neutrosophic linguistic numbers for multiple attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 27(5), 2231–2241 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu, Z.: Uncertain multi-attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, Berlin (2015)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Shen, F., Xu, J., Xu, Z.: An automatic ranking approach for multi-criteria group decision making under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak. 14(3), 311–334 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, W., Liao, H.: A bibliometric analysis of fuzzy decision research during 1970–2015. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19(1), 1–14 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ye, J.: Interval neutrosophic multiple attribute decision-making method with credibility information. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 18(5), 914–923 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zavadskas, E.K., Antucheviciene, J., Turskis, Z., Adeli, H.: Hybrid multiple-criteria decision-making methods: a review of applications in engineering. Sci. Iran. 23(1), 1–20 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou, J., Lu, P., Li, Y., Wang, C., Yuan, L., Mo, L.: Short-term hydro-thermal-wind complementary scheduling considering uncertainty of wind power using an enhanced multi-objective bee colony optimization algorithm. Energy Convers. Manage. 123, 116–129 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Garai, A., Mandal, P., Roy, T.K.: Multipollutant air quality management strategies:T-sets based optimization technique under imprecise environment. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2017). doi:10.1007/s40815-016-0286-6

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, E.: Benchmarking whole-building energy performance with multicriteria technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution using a selective objective-weighting approach. Appl. Energy 146, 92–103 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou, W., Xu, Z.: Asymmetric hesitant fuzzy sigmoid preference relations in the analytic hierarchy process. Inf. Sci. 358–359, 191–207 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dubois, D., Fargier, H., Guillaume, R., Thierry, C.: Deciding under ignorance: in search of meaningful extensions of the Hurwicz criterion to decision trees. In: Strengthening Links Between Data Analysis and Soft Computing, vol. 2015, pp. 3–11. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2015)

  13. Koç, E., Burhan, H.A.: An application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in a real world problem of store location selection. Adv. Manage. Appl. Econ. 5(1), 41 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fico, G., Gaeta, E., Arredondo, M.T., Pecchia, L.: Analytic hierarchy process to define the most important factors and related technologies for empowering elderly people in taking an active role in their health. J. Med. Syst. 39(9), 1–7 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shaverdi, M., Ramezani, I., Tahmasebi, R., Rostamy, A.A.A.: Combining fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS with financial ratios to design a novel performance evaluation model. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 18(2), 248–262 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tao, C.W., Taur, J.S., Chang, C.W., Chang, Y.H.: Simplified type-2 fuzzy sliding controller for wing rock system. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 207(8), 111–129 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Boldbaatar, E.A., Lin, C.M.: Self-learning fuzzy sliding-mode control for a water bath temperature control system. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 17(1), 31–38 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hsueh, Y.C., Su, S.F., Chen, M.C.: Decomposed fuzzy systems and their application in direct adaptive fuzzy control. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 44(10), 1772–1783 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsai, C.C., Juang, C.F.: Editorial message: special section on fuzzy theory and its applications. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 17(3), 365–365 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu, W.H., Li, M.M., Wang, X.Z.: Information fusion based on information entropy in fuzzy multi-source incomplete information system. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2016). doi:10.1007/s40815-016-0230-9

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liang, D., Liu, D.: A novel risk decision making based on decisiontheoretic rough sets under hesitant fuzzy information. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 23(2), 237–247 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liang, D., Pedrycz, W., Liu, D., Hu, P.: Three-way decisions based on decision-theoretic rough sets under linguistic assessment with the aid of group decision making. Appl. Soft Comput. 29, 256–269 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, B.: Uncertainty theory. Stud. Comput. Intell. 43(3), 205–234 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lin, Y.H., Tsai, M.S.: Non-intrusive load monitoring by novel neuro-fuzzy classification considering uncertainties. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 5(5), 2376–2384 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fu, C., Yang, S.: An evidential reasoning based consensus model for multiple attribute group decision analysis problems with interval-valued group consensus requirements. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223(1), 167–176 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Li, Y.Z., Li, M., Wu, Q.H.: Optimal reactive power dispatch with wind power integrated using group search optimizer with intraspecific competition and lévy walk. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy 2(4), 308–318 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jiang, W., Wei, B., Xie, C., Zhou, D.: An evidential sensor fusion method in fault diagnosis. Ad. Mech. Eng. 8, 1–7 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Moghaddam, K.S.: Fuzzy multi-objective model for supplier selection and order allocation in reverse logistics systems under supply and demand uncertainty. Expert Syst. Appl. 42, 6237–6254 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ding, C., Zhu, Y.: Two empirical uncertain models for project scheduling problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 66(9), 1471–1480 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cateni, S., Colla, V., Vannucci, M.: A fuzzy system for combining filter features selection methods. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2016). doi:10.1007/s40815-016-0208-7

    Google Scholar 

  31. Luo, X.S., Jing, D., Bo, X., Wang, Y.J., Li, H.B., Shen, Y.: Incorporating bioaccessibility into human health risk assessments of heavy metals in urban park soils. Sci. Total Environ. 424(4), 88–96 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou, W., Xu, Z.: Generalized asymmetric linguistic term set and its application to qualitative decision making involving risk appetites. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 254(2), 610–621 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang, Y., Deng, X., Wei, D., Deng, Y.: Assessment of E-commerce security using AHP and evidential reasoning. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(3), 3611–3623 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Zavadskas, E.K.: Fuzzy multiple criteria decision making techniques and applications-two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert Syst. Appl. 42, 4126–4148 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tao, T., Su, S.F.: Moment adaptive fuzzy control and residue compensation. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22(4), 803–816 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yu, J.R., Tseng, F.M.: Fuzzy piecewise logistic growth model for innovation diffusion: a case study of the tv industry. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 18(3), 511–522 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chang, W., Wang, W.J.: Fuzzy control synthesis for a large-scale system with a reduced number of LMIs. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 23(4), 1197–1210 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann. Math. Stat. 38(2), 325–339 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Shafer, G.: A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Zadeh, L.A.: A simple view of the Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination. Ai Mag. 7(2), 85–90 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yager, R.R.: On the Dempster–Shafer framework and new combination rules. Inf. Sci. 41(2), 93–137 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Yager, R.R., Alajlan, N.: Decision making with ordinal payoffs under Dempster–Shafer type uncertainty. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 28(11), 1039–1053 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yu, C., Yang, J., Yang, D., Ma, X., Min, H.: An improved conflicting evidence combination approach based on a new supporting probability distance. Expert Syst. Appl. 42, 5139–5149 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tang, H.: A novel fuzzy soft set approach in decision making based on grey relational analysis and Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. Appl. Soft Comput. 31, 317–325 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Deng, Y., Mahadevan, S., Zhou, D.: Vulnerability assessment of physical protection systems: a bio-inspired approach. Int. J. Unconv. Comput. 11(3,4), 227–243 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Li, B., Pang, F.W., Li, B., Pang, F.W.: An approach of vessel collision risk assessment based on the D-S evidence theory. Ocean Eng. 74(7), 16–21 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Dutta, P.: Uncertainty modeling in risk assessment based on Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence with generalized fuzzy focal elements. Fuzzy Inf. Eng. 7(1), 15–30 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Jiang, W., Xie, C., Wei, B., Zhou, D.: A modified method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades. Adv. Mech. Eng. 8(4), 1–16 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Su, X., Mahadevan, S., Xu, P., Deng, Y.: Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis using evidence theory and AHP. Risk Anal. 35(7), 1296–1316 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wei, D., Deng, X., Zhang, X., Deng, Y., Mahadevan, S.: Identifying influential nodes in weighted networks based on evidence theory. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 392(10), 2564–2575 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Dymova, L., Sevastjanov, P.: An interpretation of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in terms of evidence theory: decision making aspect. Knowl. Based Syst. 23(8), 772–782 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Deng, Y.: A threat assessment model under uncertain environment. Math. Probl. Eng. 2015, 878024 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Jiang, W., Luo, Y., Qin, X., Zhan, J.: An improved method to rank generalized fuzzy numbers with different left heights and right heights. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 28, 2343–2355 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Huang, K.Y., Li, I.H.: A multi-attribute decision-making model for the robust classification of multiple inputs and outputs datasets with uncertainty. Appl. Soft Comput. 38, 176–189 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Deng, Y.: Generalized evidence theory. Appl. Intell. 43(3), 530–543 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Deng, X., Hu, Y., Deng, Y., Mahadevan, S.: Environmental impact assessment based on D numbers. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(2), 635–643 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Su, X., Mahadevan, S., Xu, P., Deng, Y.: Handling of dependence in Dempster–Shafer theory. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 30(4), 441–467 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Deng, Y.: D numbers: theory and applications. J. Inf. Sci. 9(9), 2421–2428 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wang, N., Liu, F., Wei, D.: A modified combination rule for D numbers theory. Math. Probl. Eng. 2016(2), 1–10 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  60. Deng, X., Hu, Y., Deng, Y.: Bridge condition assessment using D numbers. Sci. World J. 2014, 358057–358057 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Liu, H.C., You, J.X., Fan, X.J., Lin, Q.L.: Failure mode and effects analysis using D numbers and grey relational projection method. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(10), 4670–4679 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Deng, X., Hu, Y., Deng, Y., Mahadevan, S.: Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(1), 156–167 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Deng, X., Lu, X., Chan, F.T.S., Sadiq, S.R., Mahadevan, S., Deng, Y.: D-CFPR: D numbers extended consistent fuzzy preference relations. Knowl. Based Syst. 73, 61–68 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Fan, G., Zhong, D., Yan, F., Yue, P.: A hybrid fuzzy evaluation method for curtain grouting efficiency assessment based on an AHP method extended by D numbers. Expert Syst. Appl. 44, 289–303 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Yang, J., Xu, D.: On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum. 32(3), 289–304 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Huynh, V.N., Nakamori, Y., Ho, T.B., Murai, T.: Multiple-attribute decision making under uncertainty: The evidential reasoning approach revisited. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum. 36(4), 804–822 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from China Scholarship Council. The work is partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61364030 and 11365008), National Natural Science Foundation of Hubei province (Grant No. 2014CFB608), Educational Commission of Hubei Province of China (Grant No.D20151902) and the Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Hubei University for Nationalities (Grant No. MY2014b003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daijun Wei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, N., Liu, X. & Wei, D. A Modified D Numbers’ Integration for Multiple Attributes Decision Making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20, 104–115 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0323-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0323-0

Keywords

Navigation