Micro-work, artificial intelligence and the automotive industry

Abstract

This paper delves into the human factors in the “back-office” of artificial intelligence and of its data-intensive algorithmic underpinnings. We show that the production of AI is a labor-intensive process, which particularly needs the little-qualified, inconspicuous and low-paid contribution of “micro-workers” who annotate, tag, label, correct and sort the data that help to train and test smart solutions. We illustrate these ideas in the high-profile case of the automotive industry, one of the largest clients of digital data-related micro-working services, notably for the development of autonomous and connected cars. This case demonstrates how micro-work has a place in long supply chains, where tech companies compete with more traditional industry players. Our analysis indicates that the need for micro-work is not a transitory, but a structural one, bound to accompany the further development of the sector; and that its provision involves workers in different geographical and linguistic areas, requiring the joint study of multiple platforms operating at both global and local levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bastin, G., & Tubaro, P. (2018). Le moment big data des sciences sociales. Revue française de sociologie, 59(3), 375–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berg, J., Furrer, M., Harmon, E., Rani, U., & Silberman, M. S. (2018). Digital labour platforms and the future of work: Towards decent work in the online world. Report, Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Casilli, A. A. (2017). Digital labor studies go global: Toward a digital decolonial turn. International Journal of Communication, 11, 3934–3954.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Casilli, A. A. (2019). En attendant les robots. Enquête sur le travail du clic. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cognilytica Research. (2019). Data Engineering, Preparation, and Labeling for AI. Report.

  9. Difallah, D., Filatova, E., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2018). Demographics and dynamics of Mechanical Turk workers. In Proceedings of WSDM 2018: The eleventh ACM international conference on web search and data mining (pp. 135–143). ACM.

  10. Ekbia, H., & Nardi, B. (2017). Heteromation, and other stories of computing and capitalism. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Forde, C., Stuart, M. Joyce, S., Oliver, L., Valizade, D., Alberti, G., Hardy, K., Trappmann, V., Umney, C., & Carson, C. (2017). The social protection of workers in the collaborative economy. Report for European Parliament Employment and Social Affairs Committee.

  12. Frey, C., & Osborne, M. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114(C), 254–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fuchs, C. (2019). Karl Marx in the age of big data capitalism. In D. Chandler & C. Fuchs (Eds.), Digital objects, digital subjects: Interdisciplinary perspectives on capitalism, labour and politics in the age of big data (pp. 53–71). London: University of Westminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Graham, M., Hjorth, I., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2017). Digital labour and development: impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 135–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gray, M., & Suri, S. (2017). The humans working behind the AI curtain. Harvard Business Review, 9, 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Irani, L. (2015). Difference and dependence among digital workers: The case of Amazon Mechanical Turk. South Atlantic Quarterly, 114, 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Irani, L. (2016). The labor that makes AI “magic”. White House and NYU: AINow Summit.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kuek, S., Paradi-Guilford, C., Fayomi, T., Imaizumi, S., & Ipeirotis, P. (2015). The global opportunity in online outsourcing. Report, World Bank.

  19. Le Ludec, C., Tubaro, P., & Casilli, A. (2019). How many people microwork in France? Estimating the size of a new labor force. Working paper. arXiv:1901.03889 [econ.GN].

  20. Lehdonvirta, V., Kässi, O., Hjorth, I., Barnard, H., & Graham, M. (2019). The global platform economy: A new offshoring institution enabling emerging-economy microproviders. Journal of Management, 45(2), 567–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ohnemus, J., Erdsiek, D., & Viete, S. (2016). Nutzung von Crowdworking durch Unternehmen: Ergebnisse einer ZEW-Unternehmensbefragung. Report, BMAS Forschungsbericht 473. Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales.

  22. Ricardo, D. (1951 [1821]). On the principles of political economy and taxation. In P. Sraffa & M. H. Dobb (Eds.) Works of David Ricardo (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  23. Rochet, J., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 990–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schmidt, F. A. (2019). Crowdproduktion von Trainingsdaten: Zur Rolle von Online-Arbeit beim Trainieren autonomer Fahrzeuge. Report, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung.

  25. Star, S. L., & Strauss, A. (1999). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8(1–2), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Data used in this study are from the DiPLab (“Digital Platform Labor”) research project, co-funded by Maison des Sciences de l’Homme Paris-Saclay (2017); Force Ouvrière (2017), a workers’ union, through IRES (Social and Economic Research Institute); and France Stratégie (2018), a service of the French Prime Minister. We also thank Foule Factory and IsAHit for logistical support, and Inria for complementary funding.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Tubaro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tubaro, P., Casilli, A.A. Micro-work, artificial intelligence and the automotive industry. J. Ind. Bus. Econ. 46, 333–345 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-019-00121-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Micro-work
  • Automotive industry
  • Digital platform economy
  • Organization of work

JEL Classification

  • D26
  • J49
  • L62
  • M13