Collecting data on TMTs’ organizational design: good practices from the StiMa project
Studying how Top Management Teams (TMTs) organize their managerial labor and decision-making processes is a relevant research avenue in light of the prominence of TMTs within modern firms. However, data on TMTs’ organizational design are usually not available from secondary sources and must instead be collected through surveys given to top executives. To help researchers in this difficult endeavor, the present paper offers a set of good practices for designing and implementing surveys on TMTs’ organizational design. To this end, we use as a basis the first-hand experience that we gained by working on the StiMa project, a large-scale data collection effort concerning the TMTs of a representative sample of Italian firms. We describe in detail all of the steps that we followed in preparing and administering the survey and in setting up and executing the additional data collection from secondary sources, which integrates survey data. We are confident that the lessons we learned from the StiMa project will help scholars in gathering better data on TMTs’ organizational design, thus advancing academics’ and practitioners’ conversations on the topic.
KeywordsSurvey research design Organizational design Top management teams Chief Executive Officers TMT members
JEL ClassificationC83–Survey Methods, Sampling Methods L2–Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior
The authors wish to thank Professors Emilio Bartezzaghi, Raffaella Cagliano, Massimo G. Colombo, Annachiara Longoni for their work on the StiMa project. Moreover, they acknowledged the invaluable contribution and energy that our dear colleague, Professor Gianluca Spina, provided to the project. Professor Spina passed away in February 2015, but his vision still inspires our work. Master students Gabriele Alboni, Giulia Arsie, Giulia Bazzerla, Silvia Bevilacqua, Martina Bonanomi, Alberto Bonvini, Federico Brambilla, Giorgio Corallo, Camilla Curnis, Alessandro Gibellini, Cristina Krobot, Matteo Mariani, Niccolò Martellini, Irene Mohammadi Masoudi, Chiara Passoni, Nicolò Perugini, Giuditta Piacenti, Stefania Siro, and Angela Vitale provided very good research assistantship. All the mistakes rely solely upon the authors.
- Aghasi, K., Colombo, M. G., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2015). Antecedents of target CEO departure in post-acquisitions: The leading role of founder. Working paper.Google Scholar
- Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123–148.Google Scholar
- Bandiera, O., Guiso, L., Prat, A., & Sadun, R. (2008). Italian managers: Fidelity or performance. Rodolfo De Benedetti Foundation Working Paper. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.211.4826&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2015.
- Bandiera, O., Guiso, L., Prat, A., & Sadun, R. (2011). What do CEOs do? (CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP8235). Retrieved at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1758445. Accessed 27 Nov 2015.
- Bandiera, O., Prat, A., & Sadun, R. (2013). Managing the family firm: Evidence from CEOs at work (Working paper No. 19722). Retrieved at NBER: http://www.nber.org/papers/w19722. Accessed 27 Nov 2015.
- Bandiera, O., Prat, A., Sadun, R., & Wulf, J. (2012). Span of control or span of activity? (Working paper). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Raffaella_Sadun/publication/254397603_Span_of_Control_and_Span_of_Activity/links/54b6907e0cf24eb34f6d2e9a.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2015.
- Baruch, Y. (1999). Response rate in academic studies—a comparative analysis. Human Relations, 52(4), 421–438.Google Scholar
- Boeker, W. (1997). Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 152–170.Google Scholar
- Carpenter, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 533–545.Google Scholar
- Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2003). Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 740–751.Google Scholar
- Colombo, M. G., Rossi-Lamastra, C., & Rovelli, P. (2016a). Delegation from the CEO to top executives: The role of workload and decision-specific knowledge. Working paper.Google Scholar
- Colombo, M. G., Rossi-Lamastra, C., & Rovelli, P. (2016b). Women at the top: The effect of CEO’s gender on the allocation of decision authority by the board of directors. Working paper.Google Scholar
- Cooper, C. L., & Payne, R. (1988). Causes, coping, and consequences of stress at work (Vol. 18). Ney York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Daft, R. L. (2010). Understanding the theory and design of organizations. Mason: South Western Cengage learning.Google Scholar
- Dean, J. W., & Sharfman, M. P. (1996). Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 368–396.Google Scholar
- Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bourgeois, L. J. (1988). Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 737–770.Google Scholar
- Falconer, D., & Hodgett, R. A. (1999). Why executives don’t respond to your survey. Proceedings of the 10th australasian conference on information systems (pp. 279–285). Atlanta: Association for Information Systems.Google Scholar
- Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2013). G4 Sustainability reporting guidelines. https://www.globalreporting.org/reporting/g4/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 15 Sept 2013.
- Guadalupe, M., & Wulf, J. (2010). The flattening firm and product market competition: The effect of trade liberalization. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(4), 105–127.Google Scholar
- Guiso, L., Pistaferri, L., & Schivardi, F. (2015). Learning entrepreneurship from other entrepreneurs? (Working paper No. w21775). Available at NBER: http://www.nber.org/papers/w21775. Accessed 15 Jan 2016.
- Halford, J. T., & Hsu, S. H. (2014). Beauty is wealth: CEO appearance and shareholder value (Working paper No. 2357756). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2357756. Accessed 27 Nov 2015.
- Hambrick, D. C. (1994). Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the “team” label. Research in Organizational Behavior, 16, 171.Google Scholar
- Jones, G. R. (2010). Organizational theory, design, and change. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Kraut, A. I. (1996). Organizational surveys: Tools for assessment and change (Vol. 3). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Mintzberg, H. (1993). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc,Google Scholar
- Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Souitaris, V., & Maestro, B. M. M. (2010). Polychronicity in top management teams: The impact on strategic decision processes and performance of new technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 31(6), 652–678.Google Scholar
- Spina, G., Rovelli, P., Colombo, M. G., Bartezzaghi, E., Cagliano, R., Longoni, A., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2015). Opportunity exploitation and TMT organizational configurations. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2694015. Accessed 27 Nov 2015.
- WERS. (2011). http://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-2011-workplace-employment-relations-study-wers. Accessed 15 Sept 2013.
- Wiersema, M. F., & Bird, A. (1993). Organizational demography in Japanese firms: Group heterogeneity, individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 996–1025.Google Scholar