Skip to main content
Log in

Appraisal of numerous machine learning techniques for the prediction of bearing capacity of strip footings subjected to inclined loading

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shallow foundations are typically the first option for the foundation engineer due to its lesser construction costs, unless they are deemed inadequate. Determining the bearing capacity of a strip footing under eccentrically inclined loading is crucial in designing foundations. In the design of shallow foundation, machine learning (ML) models have been broadly used to predict the reduction factor (the ratio of ultimate bearing capacity of strip footing under an eccentrically inclined load to the ultimate bearing capacity of strip footing under a centric vertical load) for strip footing resting over granular soil subjected to eccentrically inclined load. Convolutional neural networks (CNN), recurrent neural networks (RNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM) are utilized in this study to predict reduction factor (RF), which will be used to calculate the ultimate bearing capacity of an eccentrically inclined loaded strip footing. By taking into account three crucial inputs (e/B, α/φ and D/B) for predicting reduction factor, these three ML models are applied to 140 datasets. Various performance parameters (R2, VAF, WI, LMI, RMSE, EAE, MAE and U95) are used to evaluate how well the established ML models are being used. Using performance parameters, the results reveal that CNN had the best predictive performance among all three proposed ML models, with the highest value of coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.998 and the lowest value of root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.009 in the training phase and R2 = 0.996 and RMSE = 0.016 in the testing phase. Additionally, rank analysis, regression curve, error matrix, objective function criterion, Akaike information criterion, and performance strength criterion are used to analyze the model’s performance. Seven second-order reliability method (SORM) formulas are used to compute the probability of failure and reliability index and are compared with the failure probability and reliability index computed by first-order reliability method (FORM). An uncertainty study is performed to check the proposed ML models are capable of accurately predicting the outcomes and to evaluate the model’s robustness, external validation is performed. A sensitivity study is also performed to determine the influence of each input parameters on the output. The research finding have a big impact on geotechnical engineering and give academics and engineers new knowledge about how CNN models can be used to determine bearing capacity of strip footings under inclined loading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data presented in the paper are available with authors.

Abbreviations

ML :

Machine learning

CNN :

Convolutional neural network

RNN :

Recurrent neural network

LSTM :

Long short-term memory

GMDH :

Group method of data handling

RF :

Reduction factor

e :

Load eccentricity

D :

Depth of footing

φ :

Angle of shearing resistance

α :

Load inclination

B :

Width of footing

e/B :

Eccentricity ratio

D/B :

Embedment ratio

α/ φ :

Inclination ratio

FORM :

First-order reliability method

SORM :

Second-order reliability method

BC :

Bearing capacity

R 2 :

Coefficient of determination

R :

Coefficient of correlation

VAF :

Variance account factor

WI :

Willmott’s index of agreement

LMI :

Legate and McCabe’s index

RMSE :

Root mean square error

EAE :

Maximum absolute error

MAE :

Mean absolute error

U 95 :

Expanded uncertainty

MSE :

Mean squared error

E :

Coefficient of efficiency

PI :

Performance index

TMP :

Trend measuring parameters

EMP :

Error measuring parameters

TR :

Training

TS :

Testing

β :

Reliability index

P f :

Probability of failure

ANFIS :

Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system

FIS :

Fuzzy inference system

ANN :

Artificial neural network

PSO :

Particle swarm optimization

GOA :

Grasshopper optimization algorithm

SSA :

Salp swarm algorithm

ACO :

Ant colony optimization

LCA :

League champion optimization

WOA :

Whale optimization algorithm

MFO :

Moth-flame optimization

OBJ :

Objective function criterion

AIC :

Akaike information criterion

PSC :

Performance strength criterion

SD :

Standard deviation

ME :

Mean error

MOE :

Margin of error

UBW :

Uncertainty band width

LB :

Lower bound

UB :

Upper bound

\({\mathrm{\upepsilon }}_{S}\) :

Standard error

AME :

Absolute mean error

SOR :

Strength of relation

MBE :

Mean bias error

GPR :

Gaussian process regression

MCS :

Monte Carlo simulation

UBC :

Ultimate bearing capacity

ELM :

Extreme learning machine

MPMR :

Minimax probability machine regression

MLR :

Multiple linear regression

CV :

Cross validation

SVM :

Support vector machine

RVM :

Relevance vector machine

MARS :

Multivariate adaptive regression splines

KNN :

K-nearest neighbor

XGBoost :

Extreme gradient boosting

DT :

Decision tree

References

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Rashid Mustafa: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing-original draft, Writing-review & editing; Pijush Samui: Supervision, Validation; Sunita Kumari: Supervision; Danial Jahed Armaghani: Supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rashid Mustafa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mustafa, R., Samui, P., Kumari, S. et al. Appraisal of numerous machine learning techniques for the prediction of bearing capacity of strip footings subjected to inclined loading. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-024-02008-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-024-02008-0

Keywords

Navigation