Skip to main content

Using a hybrid Delphi hierarchical process, the development of a holistic index to measure city competitiveness in Malaysia: a case study from Penang Island

Modeling Earth Systems and Environment volume 9, pages 693–721 (2023)Cite this article

Abstract

Assessing city competitiveness is a key to achieving sustainable city development by monitoring the factors that influence everyday urban living. A holistic index was developed that accounts for the economic, sociocultural and environmental dimensions of city competitiveness. We present a detailed account of how to develop a city competitiveness index using a hybrid Delphi hierarchy process (HDHP) model that can serve as a blueprint for other studies. The model was created by consulting with experts across multiple qualitative and semi-quantitative rounds of data collection to help select the most important and sensitive criteria and sub-criteria that affect city competitiveness. In our study, the HDHP model found that for Penang Island, economic competitiveness, with a weight of 0.595 and a corresponding inconsistency (CI) of 0.04, was deemed to have a greater impact on city competitiveness than environmental competitiveness, having a weight of 0.276 and a CI of 0.02, and social and cultural competitiveness, with a weight of 0.128 and a CI of 0.08. Zone 1 has a weight of 0.360, which means it has less of an influence than Zone 2, which has a weight of 0.636 as an option in terms of economic competitiveness. Economic and environmental competitiveness have a significant impact on Zone 2. We highlight that the index to city competitiveness assessment (CCA) needs to be complex to balance economic, sociocultural and environmental aspects and that such knowledge will enhance our understanding of the type of data that need to be monitored by agencies for modelling purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Aksoy L, Banda S, Harmeling C, Keiningham TL, Pansari A (2022) Marketing’s role in multi-stakeholder engagement. Int J Res Mark 39(2):445–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Husain R, Khorramshahgol R (2020) Incorporating analytical hierarchy process and goal programming to design responsive and efficient supply chains. Operations Research Perspectives 7:100149

    Google Scholar 

  • Allam Z, Sharifi A, Bibri SE, Jones DS, Krogstie J (2022) The metaverse as a virtual form of smart cities: opportunities and challenges for environmental, economic, and social sustainability in urban futures. Smart Cities 5(3):771–801

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaro SL, Barbosa S, Ammerer G, Bruno A, Guimerà J, Orfanoudakis I, Hitch M (2022) Multi-criteria decision analysis for evaluating transitional and post-mining options—an innovative perspective from the EIT ReviRIS project. Sustainability 14(4):2292

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreolli F, Bragolusi P, D’Alpaos C, Faleschini F, Zanini MA (2022) An AHP model for multiple-criteria prioritization of seismic retrofit solutions in gravity-designed industrial buildings. Journal of Building Engineering 45:103493

    Google Scholar 

  • Arachchige CN, Prendergast LA, Staudte RG (2022) Robust analogs to the coefficient of variation. J Appl Stat 49(2):268–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydi A, Abichou T, Nasr IH, Louati M, Zairi M (2016) Assessment of land suitability for olive mill wastewater disposal site selection by integrating fuzzy logic, AHP, and WLC in a GIS. Environ Monit Assess 188(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayyildiz E (2022) Fermatean fuzzy step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and its application to prioritizing indicators to achieve sustainable development Goal-7. Renew Energy 193:136–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacca EJM, Knight A, Trifkovic M (2020) Optimal land use and distributed generation technology selection via geographic-based multicriteria decision analysis and mixed-integer programming. Sustain Cities Soc 55:102055

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagheri M, Zaiton Ibrahim Z, Akhir MF, Talaat WIAW, Oryani B, Rezania S, Pour AB (2021a) Developing a climate change vulnerability index for coastal city sustainability, mitigation, and adaptation: a case study of Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia. Land 10(11):1271

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagheri M, Zaiton Ibrahim Z, Mansor S, Abd Manaf L, Akhir MF, Talaat WIAW, Beiranvand Pour A (2021b) Application of Multi-criteria decision-making model and expert choice software for coastal city vulnerability evaluation. Urban Sci 5(4):84

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagheri M, Zaiton Ibrahim Z, Mansor S, Manaf LA, Akhir MF, Talaat WIAW, Beiranvand Pour A (2021c) Land-use suitability assessment using delphi and analytical hierarchy process (D-AHP) Hybrid model for Coastal City Management: Kuala Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 10(9):621

    Google Scholar 

  • Belay S, Goedert J, Woldesenbet A, Rokooei S (2021) A hybrid delphi-AHP based analysis of construction project-specific success factors in emerging markets: the case of Ethiopia. Cogent Engineering 8(1):1891701

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein M (2022) Comprehensive meta‐analysis software. In: Systematic reviews in health research: meta‐analysis in context, pp 535–548

  • Broz JL, Frieden J, Weymouth S (2021) Populism in place: the economic geography of the globalization backlash. Int Organ 75(2):464–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Camba A (2020) The Sino-centric capital export regime: State-backed and flexible capital in the Philippines. Dev Chang 51(4):970–997

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrera Portugal A (2019) The role of city rankings in local public policy design: Urban competitiveness and economic press. Glob Media China 4(2):162–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole ZD, Donohoe HM, Stellefson ML (2013) Internet-based Delphi research: case based discussion. Environ Manag 51(3):511–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Czinkota MR, Kotabe M, Vrontis D, Shams SM (2021) Understanding the market environment and the competition. In: Marketing management. Springer, Cham, pp 91–134

  • da Cruz NF, Rode P, McQuarrie M (2019) New urban governance: A review of current themes and future priorities. J Urban Aff 41(1):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalalah D, Khan SA, Al-Ashram Y, Albeetar S, Abou Ali Y, Alkhouli E (2022) An integrated framework for the assessment of environmental sustainability in wood supply chains. Environ Technol Innov 27:102429

    Google Scholar 

  • Das AK, Chatterjee U, Mukherjee J (2022) Solid waste management through multicriteria decision making: using analytic hierarchy process as an assessment framework for the Hooghly district, West Bengal. GeoJournal, pp 1–20.

  • Daye C (2016) “A fiction of long standing” Techniques of prospection and the role of positivism in US Cold War social science. 1950–65. Hist Human Sci 29(4–5):35–58

    Google Scholar 

  • De Toro P, Nocca F, Renna A, Sepe L (2020) Real estate market dynamics in the city of Naples: An integration of a multicriteria decision analysis and geographical information system. Sustainability 12(3):1211

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande PC, Skaar C, Brattebø H, Fet AM (2020) Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method for assessing the sustainability of end-of-life alternatives for waste plastics: a case study of Norway. Sci Total Environ 719:137353

    Google Scholar 

  • Diao Q, Sun W, Yuan X, Li L, Zheng Z (2016) Life-cycle private-cost-based competitiveness analysis of electric vehicles in China considering the intangible cost of traffic policies. Appl Energy 178:567–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilekoglu MF, Aslan V (2022) Determination of groundwater potential distribution of Ceylanpinar Plain (Turkey) in Upper Mesopotamia by using geographical information techniques and Fuzzy-AHP with MCDM. Water Supply 22(1):372–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Dima AM, Begu L, Vasilescu MD, Maassen MA (2018) The relationship between the knowledge economy and global competitiveness in the European Union. Sustainability 10(6):1706

    Google Scholar 

  • Djouani I, Dehimi S, Redjem A (2022) Evaluation of the efficiency and quality of the tram route of Setif city, Algeria: Combining AHP and GIS approaches. J Geograph Inst Jovan Cvjić SASA 72(1):85–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawad M, Ullah F, Irshad M, Shah W, Mahmood Q, Ahmad I (2022) Marble waste site suitability assessment using the GIS-based AHP model. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(19):28386–28401

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu C, Chang W, Yang S (2020) Multiple criteria group decision making based on group satisfaction. Inf Sci 518:309–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Garau M, Hampson G, Devlin N, Mazzanti NA, Profico A (2018) Applying a multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach to elicit Stakeholders’ preferences in Italy: the case of Obinutuzumab for rituximab-refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). PharmacoEconomics-Open 2(2):153–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghahremani H, Afsari Bajestani S, McCarthy L, Jalalianhosseini M (2021) Transformation of urban spaces within cities in the context of globalization and urban competitiveness. J Urban Plan Dev 147(3):05021026

    Google Scholar 

  • Göçer A, Özpeynirci Ö, Semiz M (2021) Logistics performance index-driven policy development: an application to Turkey. Transport Policy 124:

  • Gunduz M, Elsherbeny HA (2020) Operational framework for managing construction-contract administration practitioners’ perspective through modified Delphi method. J Constr Eng Manag 146(3):04019110

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwiaździńska-Goraj M, Jezierska-Thöle A, Dudzińska M (2022) Assessment of the living conditions in polish and german transborder regions in the context of strengthening territorial cohesion in the European Union: competitiveness or complementation? Soc Indic Res, pp 1–31

  • Gygli S, Haelg F, Potrafke N, Sturm JE (2019) The KOF globalisation index–revisited. Rev Int Organ 14(3):543–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajduk S (2016) The concept of a smart city in urban management. Bus Manag Educ 14(1):34–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartawan MS, Putra AS, Muktiono A (2020) Smart city concept for integrated citizen information smart card or ICISC in DKI Jakarta. Int J Sci Technol Manag 1(4):364–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiko A (2012) Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: review and implications for future quality assurance. Technol Forecast Soc Change 79(8):1525–1536

    Google Scholar 

  • Herath HMM, Wijesekera NTS, Rajapakse RLHL (2021) Development of an operational framework for flood risk management. In IOP Conf SerEarth Environ Sci 943(1):012009

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu S, Ge D, Hu G, Sun J, Ma Y, Lu M, Lu Y (2022) The patterns and mechanisms of land price divergence in multiple industries from the perspective of element flows: the case of the Yangtze River Delta. China Land 11(2):188

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishizaka A, Labib A (2009) Analytic hierarchy process and expert choice: benefits and limitations. Or Insight 22(4):201–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Jusoh S, Abd Razak MF (2022) Special economic zones in ASEAN: the cases of Lao PDR, Malaysia, and Myanmar. In: Handbook of research on special economic zones as regional development enablers. IGI Global, pp 92–108

  • Kayugina S, Eremin D (2022) Microaggregate composition as a factor of variability in the physical properties of gray forest soils in Western Siberia. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 1043(1):012015

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoo SL, Chang NSF (2021) The Malaysian scenario: setting the context. in creative city as an urban development strategy. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore, pp 47–70

  • Knowles RD, Ferbrache F (2016) Evaluation of wider economic impacts of light rail investment on cities. J Transp Geogr 54:430–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Križnik B (2018) Transformation of deprived urban areas and social sustainability: a comparative study of urban regeneration and urban redevelopment in Barcelona and Seoul. Urbani Izziv 29(1):83–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukah ASK, Owusu-Manu DG, Badu E, Edwards DJ (2022) Delphi study for evaluating key risk factors inherent in public-private partnership (PPP) power projects in Ghana. J Fac Manag (ahead-of-print)

  • Kwon S, Kim J, Oh DS (2012) Measurement of urban competitiveness based on innovation indicators in six metropolitan cities in Korea. World Technopolis Rev 1(3):177–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Labrianidis L, Sykas T, Sachini E, Karampekios N (2022) Highly educated skilled migrants are attracted to global cities: The case of Greek PhD holders. Popul Space Place 28(3):e2517

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam JSL, Yap WY (2019) A stakeholder perspective of port city sustainable development. Sustainability 11(2):447

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal JE (2020) AHP-express: A simplified version of the analytical hierarchy process method. MethodsX 7:100748

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J (2022) Analysis of several issues on urban management. In: China's reform and new urbanization. Springer, Singapore, pp 63–75

  • Loganathan T, Chan ZX, Hassan F, Ong ZL, Majid HA (2022) Undocumented: An examination of legal identity and education provision for children in Malaysia. PLoS ONE 17(2):e0263404

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu HK, Tsai SC, Lin PC, Chu KC, Chen AN (2020) Toward a new real-time approach for group consensus: A usability analysis of synchronous Delphi system. Group Decis Negot 29(2):345–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund BD (2020) Review of the Delphi method in library and information science research. J Doc

  • Malek NM, Mohamed A (2022) Revisiting homeownership affordability issues among the urban middle-income group in Penang, Malaysia: multi-dimensional impacts. Malays J Soc Sci Hum (MJSSH) 7(4):e001448–e001448

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastrocinque E, Ramírez FJ, Honrubia-Escribano A, Pham DT (2020) An AHP-based multicriteria model for sustainable supply chain development in the renewable energy sector. Expert Syst Appl 150:113321

    Google Scholar 

  • Meesapawong P, Rezgui Y, Li H (2014) Planning innovation orientation in public research and development organizations: using a combined Delphi and analytic hierarchy process approach. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 87:245–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehriar M, Masoumi H, Mohino I (2020) Urban sprawl, socioeconomic features, and travel patterns in middle east countries: a case study in Iran. Sustainability 12(22):9620

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijers EJ, Burger MJ, Hoogerbrugge MM (2016) Borrowing size in networks of cities: City size, network connectivity and metropolitan functions in Europe. Pap Reg Sci 95(1):181–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyauchi T, Setoguchi T, Ito T (2021) Quantitative estimation method for urban areas to develop compact cities in view of unprecedented population decline. Cities 114:103151

    Google Scholar 

  • Momaya KS (2019) The past and the future of competitiveness research: a review in an emerging context of innovation and EMNEs. Int J Glob Bus Compet 14(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Monfaredzadeh T, Berardi U (2015) Beneath the smart city: Dichotomy between sustainability and competitiveness. Int J Sustain Build Technol Urban Dev 6(3):140–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee N, Huge J, Sutherland WJ, McNeill J, Van Opstal M, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Koedam N (2015) The Delphi technique in ecology and biological conservation: applications and guidelines. Methods Ecol Evol 6(9):1097–1109

    Google Scholar 

  • Natarajan N, Vasudevan M, Dineshkumar SK, Anuja R (2022) Comparison of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (f-AHP) for the sustainability assessment of a water supply project. J Inst Eng (India) Ser A, pp 1–11

  • Palin V, Van Staa TP, Steels S, Troxel AB, Groenwold RH, MacDonald TM, GetReal Initiative (2022) A first step towards best practice recommendations for the design and statistical analyses of pragmatic clinical trials: a modified Delphi approach. Br J Clin Pharmacol

  • Panchal S, Shrivastava AK (2022) Landslide hazard assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP): a case study of National Highway 5 in India. Ain Shams Eng J 13(3):101626

    Google Scholar 

  • Pathak VK, Kumar N, Patel RK (2022) An analytical implementation of AHP in supply chain working environment. In: Advances in mechanical and materials technology. Springer, Singapore, pp 969–979

  • Pellegrino D (2021) A MCDA approach based on fuzzy dominance intensity to deal with partial information in a group decision making context (Doctoral dissertation, ETSI_Informatica).

  • Rodrigues M, Franco M (2020) Measuring the urban sustainable development in cities through a Composite Index: the case of Portugal. Sustain Dev 28(4):507–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Romão J, Kourtit K, Neuts B, Nijkamp P (2018) The smart city as a common place for tourists and residents: A structural analysis of the determinants of urban attractiveness. Cities 78:67–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosni NA, Noor NM, Abdullah A (2016) Managing urbanisation and urban sprawl in Malaysia by using remote sensing and GIS applications. Plan Malays (4)

  • Rozar NM, Sidik MH, Razik MA, Kamaruddin SA, Rozar MKAM, Usman I, Alown BE (2022) A hierarchical cluster analysis of port performance in Malaysia. Mar Bus Rev (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/MABR-07-2020-0040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab K, Sala-i-Martín X (2016) The global competitiveness report 2013–2014: Full, data. World Economic Forum

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott D, Hall CM, Stefan G (2012) Tourism and climate change: Impacts, adaptation and mitigation. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedghiyan D, Ashouri A, Maftouni N, Xiong Q, Rezaee E, Sadeghi S (2021) Prioritization of renewable energy resources in five climate zones in Iran using AHP, hybrid AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-SAW methods. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 44:101045

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharifi A (2020) A typology of smart city assessment tools and indicator sets. Sustain Cities Soc 53:101936

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe LM, Harwell MC, Jackson CA (2021) Integrated stakeholder prioritization criteria for environmental management. J Environ Manag 282:111719

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi W (2022) Construction and evaluation of college students' psychological quality evaluation model based on analytic hierarchy process. J Sens

  • Skulmoski GJ, Hartman FT, Krahn J (2007) The Delphi method for graduate research. J Inf Technol Educ Res 6:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Sta HB (2017) Quality and the efficiency of data in “Smart-Cities.” Futur Gener Comput Syst 74:409–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper M, Scott AJ (2016) Current debates in urban theory: A critical assessment. Urban Stud 53:1114–1136

    Google Scholar 

  • Su X (2022) Unpacking administrative rank: Intercity competition and the remaking of local state space in China. Polit Geogr 92:102518

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutriadi R (2018) Defining smart city, smart region, smart village, and technopolis as an innovative concept in indonesia’s urban and regional development themes to reach sustainability. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 202(1):012047

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan RZ, Markus C, Vasikaran S, Loh TP, APFCB Harmonization of Reference Intervals Working Group (2022) Comparison of four indirect (data mining) approaches to derive within-subject biological variation. Clin Chem Lab Med (CCLM) 60(4):636–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang Y, Sun H, Yao Q, Wang Y (2014) The selection of key technologies by the silicon photovoltaic industry based on the Delphi method and AHP (analytic hierarchy process): case study of China. Energy 75:474–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Teena AMO, Amali AI, Jecintha MIR (2022) Comprehensive trust based service selection model in federated cloud. J Algebraic Stat 13(2):568–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaidya OS, Kumar S (2006) Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur J Oper Res 169(1):1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang F, Wen X, Aziz A, Luhach AK (2021) The need for local adaptation of smart infrastructure for sustainable economic management. Environ Impact Assess Rev 88:106565

    Google Scholar 

  • Zangenehmadar Z, Moselhi O (2016) Prioritizing deterioration factors of water pipelines using Delphi method. Measurement 90:491–499

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for this project was provided by the Universiti Siens Malaysia (USM), TRGS grant under KPT with project number (203/ppjauh/6761004). The authors thank all the government agencies of Penang Island who helped in this project, as well as the many pilots, who made this project possible. The authors also thank the Department of Environment (DOE), DID, JUPEM, Economic Planning Unit (EPU), Penang Development Corporation (PDC), Penang Institute, Valuation and Property Services Department (JPPN), City Council of Penang (MBPP), Penang Green Council (PGC), Penang Skills Department Centre (PSDC) and Public Work Department (IKR) for providing time.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Oceanography and Environment, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia

    Milad Bagheri & Wan Izatul Asma binti Wan Talaat

  2. School of Distance Education, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Gelugor, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

    Radziah Adam & Ku Azam Tuan Lonik

  3. Quantity Surveying Department, School of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

    Mastura Jaafar

  4. School of Geography and Sustainable Communities, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue , Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia

    Isabelle D. Wolf

  5. Centre for Ecosystem Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia

    Isabelle D. Wolf

Authors
  1. Milad Bagheri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Radziah Adam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mastura Jaafar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ku Azam Tuan Lonik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wan Izatul Asma binti Wan Talaat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Isabelle D. Wolf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milad Bagheri.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bagheri, M., Adam, R., Jaafar, M. et al. Using a hybrid Delphi hierarchical process, the development of a holistic index to measure city competitiveness in Malaysia: a case study from Penang Island. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 9, 693–721 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01509-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01509-0

Keywords

  • Hybrid Delphi analysis
  • Analytic hierarchy design
  • Decision-making
  • Coastal city
  • Urban quality of life