Advertisement

Modeling Earth Systems and Environment

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 1041–1057 | Cite as

Computational study on vertical axis wind turbine car: static study

  • Youssef KassemEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

This paper describes the static simulation of three models of a vertical axis wind turbine car using computational fluid dynamic (Autodesk CFD). In this study, the considered three models have different 3 blade wind turbine: NACA 0012 with an angle of attack 2°, big single C-section and C-section blades. The vertical axis wind turbine car was designed using AutoCAD 2014. The most significant parameter considered in order to design a suitable vertical axis wind turbine car is the aerodynamic drag in terms of drag force and drag coefficient. The simulation was performed for wind speeds ranging between 4 and 8 m/s. The wind speeds have been considered during the analysis under turbulence k–ε model. The results show the aerodynamic drag and the characteristics of streamlines flow that occurs on the vertical axis wind turbine and the body of the car especially for the forebody, upper body, and rear body. These parameters were used to compare the three different models of the wind car. Consequently, it was shown in the results that the big single C-section blade is the most efficient blade for a vertical axis wind turbine car since it has the maximum drag force, compared to the other blades.

Keywords

Aerodynamic drag Blade CFD Streamlines flow Vertical axis wind turbine Wind car 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank the Faculty of Engineering especially the Mechanical Engineering Department for their support during the work validation of this new technology. Also, the author wishes to express their sincere thanks to Assist. Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Çamur for his critical comments.

References

  1. Abreu R, (2013) Adaptive automotive aerodynamics. University of Johannesburg, JohannesburgGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker C (2010) The flow around high speed trains. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 98(6–7):277–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bijlani B, Rathod P, Sorthiya A (2013) Experimental investigation of aerodynamic forces on sedan, fastback and square-back car by simulation in CFD Review Study. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 3(2): 346–349Google Scholar
  4. Bilir L, İmir M, Devrim Y, Albostan A (2015) An investigation on wind energy potential and small scale wind turbine performance at İncek region—Ankara, Turkey. Energy Convers Manag (103):910–923Google Scholar
  5. Çamur H, Kassem Y (2012a) Operating a three blade-wind car with wind energy. Adv Mater Res.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.622-623.1199 Google Scholar
  6. Çamur H, Kassem Y (2012b) Creating the wind energy for operating the 3-C-section blades wind car. Adv Mater Res.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.622-623.1188 Google Scholar
  7. Cheng S, Tsubokura M, Nakashima T, Nouzawa T, Okada Y (2011) A numerical analysis of transient flow past road vehicles subjected to pitching oscillation. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 99(5):511–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Day AH, Cooper C (2011) An experimental study of interceptors for drag reduction on high-performance sailing yachts. Ocean Eng 38(8–9):983–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Djavareshkian M, Esmaeli A, Parsani A (2011) Aerodynamics of smart flap underground effect. Aerosp Sci Technol 15(8):642–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Emilio MD, (2017) Microelectronic circuit design for energy harvesting systems. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emran A, Rob MA, Kabir MH, Islam MN, (2015) Modeling spatio-temporal shoreline and areal dynamics of coastal island using geospatial technique. Model Earth Syst Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-015-0060-z Google Scholar
  12. Genta G (2008) Motor vehicle dynamics: modeling and simulation. World Scientific, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghani S, Aroussi A, Rice E (2001) Simulation of road vehicle natural environment in a climatic wind tunnel. Simul Pract Theory 8(6–7):359–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heisler H, (2002) Advanced vehicle technology. Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Heisler H (2004) Advanced vehicle technology. Butterworth Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Jakariya M, Islam MN (2017) Evaluation of climate change induced vulnerability and adaptation strategies at Haor areas in Bangladesh by integrating GIS and DIVA model. Model Earth Syst Environ 3(4):1303–1321.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0378-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jimmy AN, Khan NA. Hossain MN, Sujauddin M (2017) Evaluation of the environmental impacts of rice paddy production using life cycle assessment: case study in Bangladesh. Model Earth Syst Environ 3(4):1691–1705.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0368-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kassem Y, Çamur H (2017) A numerical study of a newly developed of savonius wind turbine style on increasing the performance of savonius wind rotor. Am J Mod Energy 3(6):15–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumbernuss J, Chen J, Yang H, Lu L (2012) Investigation into the relationship of the overlap ratio and shift angle of double stage three bladed vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT). J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn (107):57–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ohunakin OS, Oyewola OM, Adaramola MS (2013) Economic analysis of wind energy conversion systems using levelized cost of electricity and present value cost methods in Nigeria. Int J Energy Environ Eng 4(1):2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Onorato M, Costelli A, Garrone A, Viassone L (1986) Experimental analysis of vehicle wakes. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 22(2–3):317–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Osinowo AA, Okogbue EC, Eresanya EO, Akande OS (2017) Evaluation of wind potential and its trends in the mid-Atlantic. Model Earth Syst Environ 3(4):1199–1213.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0399-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ozay C, Celiktas MS (2016) Statistical analysis of wind speed using two-parameter Weibull distribution in Alaçatı region. Energy Convers Manag 121:49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Puhn F (1986) How to make your car handle. H.P. Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Raghunathan RS, Kim H, Setoguchi T (2002) Aerodynamics of high-speed railway train. Prog Aerosp Sci 38(6–7):469–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rozhdestvensky KV, Ryzhov VA (2003) Aerohydrodynamics of flapping-wing propulsors. Prog Aerosp Sci 39(8):585–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sundar S, Mishra AK, Naresh R (2018) Modeling the impact of media awareness programs on mitigation of carbon dioxide emitted from automobiles. Model Earth Syst Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0401-1 Google Scholar
  28. Viswanath P (2002) Aircraft viscous drag reduction using riblets. Prog Aerosp Sci 38(6–7):571–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang B, Cot L, Adolphe L, Geoffroy S (2017) Estimation of wind energy of a building with canopy roof. Sustain Cities Soc 35:02–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Watkins S, Vino G (2008) The effect of vehicle spacing on the aerodynamics of a representative car shape. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 96(6–7):1232–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wikipedia (2018) Wind-powered vehicle. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind-powered_vehicle. Accessed 7 Feb 2018
  32. Wolf-Heinrich H (1998) Aerodynamic of road vehicle. Society of Automotive Engineers Inc, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  33. Young DF (2011) A brief introduction to fluid mechanics. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringNear East UniversityNicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations