Modeling Earth Systems and Environment

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 421–435 | Cite as

Modeling uncertainty of statistical downscaling methods in quantifying the climate change impacts on late spring frost risk over Iran

Original Article
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

Late spring frosts (LSFs) play a key role in the evaluation of climate suitability for agricultural and horticultural crop production and are considered to be one of the main components of food security. It is expected that future climate change will affect the occurrence of LSFs and its damages. In order to quantify these changes, this study aims to investigate the performance of two downscaling methods (SDSM and ANN), using two GCMs (general circulation model) data of HadCM3 (A2 and B2 scenarios) and CGCM3 (A1B and A2 scenarios). To this end, daily minimum temperature data (Tmin i ) of 50 meteorological stations located across the entire country were gathered and quality controlled for the period 1961 through 2010. The trend analyses of annual minimum temperature series showed a significant increasing trend of 0.3 °C per decade (α = 0.01). Both downscaling models were calibrated for the 40 years of 1961–2000 and the evaluation is conducted for the 10 years of 2001–2010. The Wilcoxon rank-sum and the Levene and bootstrapping tests were used for comparing and finding confidence intervals of averages and variances of downscaled daily minimum temperatures at each month. Results showed that, firstly, downscaling models’ performance in simulating averages is much better than variances. Secondly, SDSM simulates warmer summers and colder winters comparing ANN. Thirdly, the best and the worst results were achieved by ANN_CGCM3_A2 and ANN_HadCM3_B2, respectively. Finally, very low, moderate, high, and very high-risk zones for critical temperature of 0 °C and their areas at the historical period (1961–2010) and three future periods (2011–2040, 2041–2070, 2071–2100) were quantified and compared. Based on the results, SDSM simulated changes in the high and low frost risk zones more than the ANN model. However, since both Very High and No Frost risk zones will drastically change, SDSM results do not always indicate an increasing risk of frost damage. Moreover, the average of the area covered by “low-risk” zone will increase from 1.00% in the current period to 4.43% at the end of the century, and area of “very high-risk” zone will decrease from 8.2 to 4.7% at the same condition.

Keyword

Climate change Uncertainty Frost risk SDSM ANN Iran 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by Iran National Science Foundation and executed at University of Tehran-College of Agricultural and Natural Resources (UTCAN).

References

  1. Abbasnia M, Toros H (2016) Future changes in maximum temperature using the statistical downscaling model (SDSM) at selected stations of Iran. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:68.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0112-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Augspurger CK (2013) Reconstructing patterns of temperature, phenology, and frost damage over 124 years: spring damage risk is increasing. Ecology 94(1):41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennie J, Kubin E, Wiltshire A, Huntley B, Baxter R (2010) Predicting spatial and temporal patterns of bud-burst and spring frost risk in north-west Europe: the implications of local adaptation to climate. Global Change Biol 16(5):1503–1514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown MB, Forsythe AB (1974) Robust tests for the equality of variances. J Am Stat Assoc 69(346):364–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conover WJ (1980) Practical Nonparametric statistics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Coulibaly P, Dibike YB, Anctil F (2005) Downscaling precipitation and temperature with temporal neural networks. J Hydrometeorol 6(4):483–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crimp S, Gobbet D, Thomas D, Bakar S, Nidumolu U, Hayman P, Hopwood G (2012) Understanding frost risk in a variable and changing climate. CSIRO, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  8. Crimp S, Bakar KS, Kokic P, Jin H, Nicholls N, Howden M (2015) Bayesian space-time model to analyse frost risk for agriculture in Southeast Australia. Int J Climatol 35(8):2092–2108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Darand M, Mansouri Daneshvar MR (2015) Variation of agro-climatic indices in Kurdistan province of Iran within 1962–2012. Model Earth Syst Environ 1:7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-015-0010-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eccel E, Rea R, Caffarra A, Crisci A (2009) Risk of spring frost to apple production under future climate scenarios: the role of phenological acclimation. Int J Biometeorol 53(3):273–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Efron B (1987) Better bootstrap confidence intervals. J Am Stat Assoc 82(397):171–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Monographs on statistics and applied probability, vol 57. Chapman & Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farajzadeh M, Rahimi M, Kamali GA, Mavrommatis T (2010) Modelling apple tree bud burst time and frost risk in Iran. Meteorol Appl 17(1):45–52Google Scholar
  14. Gagnon S, Singh B, Rousselle J, Roy L (2005) An application of the statistical downscaling model (SDSM) to simulate climatic data for streamflow modelling in Québec. Can Water Resour J 30(4):297–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giorgi F, Hewitson B, Christensen J, Fu C, Jones R, Hulme M, Mearns L, Von Storch H, Whetton P (2001) Regional climate information—evaluation and projections. In: ed Houghton JT et al Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Cambridge Univesity Press, New York, pp 583–638Google Scholar
  16. Hänninen H (2006) Climate warming and the risk of frost damage to boreal forest trees: identification of critical ecophysiological traits. Tree Physiol 26(7):889–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hosseini-Moghari SM, Araghinejad S, Azarnivand A (2017) Drought forecasting using data-driven methods and an evolutionary algorithm. Model Earth Syst Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0385-x Google Scholar
  18. Huang J, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Xu C, Wang B, Yao J (2011) Estimation of future precipitation change in the Yangtze River basin by using statistical downscaling method. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25(6):781–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Inouye DW (2008) Effects of climate change on phenology, frost damage, and floral abundance of montane wildflowers. Ecology 89(2):353–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Katz D (2010) Frost and flowers: predicting the effects of climate change on spring frost damage using a large pollen count dataset. Nat Proc.  https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2010.5365.1 Google Scholar
  21. Kaukoranta T, Tahvonen R, Ylämäki A (2008) Climatic potential and risks for apple growing by 2040. Agric Food Sci 19(2):144–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khalili A (2009) Agro meteorological zoning of Iran for insurance against drought, frost and heavy rainfall damages, vol 2, 7. Agricultural Insurance Fund, Tehran (in Persian) Google Scholar
  23. Khalili A (2014) Quantitative evaluation of spring frost risk to agricultural and horticultural crops in iran and modeling. J Agric Meteorol 2(1):17–31Google Scholar
  24. Khalili A, Rahimi J (2014) High-resolution spatiotemporal distribution of precipitation in Iran: a comparative study with three global-precipitation datasets. Theor Appl Climatol 118(1–2):211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khalili A, Darvish Sefat A, Baradaran-e-rade R, Bazrafshan JA (2004) Method for climatic classification on selianinov system in GIS media (a case study for north west of Iran). Biaban (Desert) 9(2):227–237 (in Persian)Google Scholar
  26. Kreyling J, Thiel D, Simmnacher K, Willner E, Jentsch A, Beierkuhnlein C (2012) Geographic origin and past climatic experience influence the response to late spring frost in four common grass species in central Europe. Ecography 35(3):268–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lehmann EL (1975) Nonparametrics: statistical methods based on ranks. Holden and Day, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  28. Levene H (1960) Robust tests for equality of variances. Contrib Probab Stat 1:278–292Google Scholar
  29. Linkosalo T, Carter TR, Häkkinen R, Hari P (2000) Predicting spring phenology and frost damage risk of Betula spp. under climatic warming: a comparison of two models. Tree Physiol 20(17):1175–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mahmood R, Babel MS (2013) Evaluation of SDSM developed by annual and monthly sub-models for downscaling temperature and precipitation in the Jhelum basin, Pakistan and India. Theor Appl Climatol 113(1–2):27–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Molitor D, Caffarra A, Sinigoj P, Pertot I, Hoffmann L, Junk J (2014) Late frost damage risk for viticulture under future climate conditions: a case study for the Luxembourgish winegrowing region. Aust J Grape Wine R 20(1):160–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Potop V, Zahraniček P, Türkott L, Štěpánek P, Soukup J (2014) Risk occurrences of damaging frosts during the growing season of vegetables in the Elbe River lowland, the Czech Republic. Nat Hazards 71(1):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rahimi M, Hajjam S, Khalili A, Kamali GA, Stigter CJ (2007) Risk analysis of first and last frost occurrences in the Central Alborz Region, Iran. Int J Climatol 27(3):349–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rahimi J, Ebrahimpour M, Khalili A (2013) Spatial changes of extended De Martonne climatic zones affected by climate change in Iran. Theor Appl Climatol 112(3–4):409–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rahimi J, Khalili A, Bazrafshan J (2017a) Evaluation of different missing data reconstruction methods for daily minimum temperature in elevated stations of Iran: comparison with new proposed approach. Iran J Soil Water Res 48(2):231:239 (in Persian)Google Scholar
  36. Rahimi J, Khalili A, Bazrafshan J (2017b) Analysis of late spring frost dates over Iran under current climate and future scenarios. Model Earth Syst Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0393-x Google Scholar
  37. Rigby JR, Porporato A (2008) Spring frost risk in a changing climate. Geophys Res Lett 35(12):L12703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rochette P, Belanger G, Castonguay Y, Bootsma A, Mongrain D (2004) Climate change and winter damage to fruit trees in eastern Canada. Can J Plant Sci 84(4):1113–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scheifinger H, Menzel A, Koch E, Peter C (2003) Trends of spring time frost events and phenological dates in Central Europe. Theor Appl Climatol 74(1–2):41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ustrnul Z, Wypych A, Winkler JA, Czekierda D (2014) Late spring freezes in Poland in relation to atmospheric circulation. Quaest Geogr 33(3):165–172Google Scholar
  41. Weiland FS, Van Beek LPH, Weerts AH, Bierkens MFP (2012) Extracting information from an ensemble of GCMs to reliably assess future global runoff change. J Hydrol 412:66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilby RL, Wigley TML (1997) Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations. Prog Phys Geogr 21(4):530–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilby RL, Dawson CW, Barrow EM (2002) SDSM—a decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts. Environ Modell Softw 17:147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Winkler JA, Andresen J, Bisanz J, Guentchev GS, Nugent J, Piromsopa K, Rothwell N, Zavalloni C, Clark J, Min HK, Pollyea A, Prawiranta H (2013) Michigan’s tart cherry industry: vulnerability to climate variability and change. In: Pryor SC (ed) climate change in the midwest: impacts, risks, vulnerability and adaptation. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp 104–116Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Irrigation and Reclamation Engineering, University College of Agriculture and Natural ResourcesUniversity of TehranKarajIran

Personalised recommendations