Abstract
The constellation of co-adapted traits that facilitate short-term mating promote the use of riskier and interpersonally antagonistic intrasexual competition tactics. Aggressive behavior can be used to vie against rivals for mates and resources that facilitate reproductive success; however, there is limited research regarding whether individual differences in a short-term mating orientation (i.e., unrestricted sociosexuality) are reliably associated with same-sex aggression, particularly indirect aggression. There is also some research suggesting that short-term mating tendencies are linked to inter-individual variability in the desire to compete with same-sex others for access to mates and reproductive resources (i.e., intrasexual competitiveness). We therefore speculated that intrasexual competitiveness might help to explain why those pursuing a short-term mating strategy may perpetrate more indirect aggression toward same-sex peers. In a sample of 290 Canadian heterosexual young adults, unrestricted sociosexuality positively predicted same-sex indirect aggression and intrasexual competitiveness, and intrasexual competitiveness mediated the positive link between unrestricted sociosexuality and indirect aggression. Exploratory analyses revealed that the desire facet of sociosexuality was driving the effect. These findings suggest that those with a short-term mating orientation, particularly those with unrestricted sociosexual desires, engage in more indirect aggression against same-sex peers, and that this association is, in part, explained by an inclination to be combative with same-sex rivals over social and mating resources.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available upon request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy and ethical restrictions.
References
Ainsworth, S. E., & Maner, J. K. (2012). Sex begets violence: Mating motives, social dominance, and physical aggression in men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(5), 819–829. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029428
Apostolou, M. (2021). Plurality in mating: Exploring the occurrence and contingencies of mating strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 175, Article 110689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110689
Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 291–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/10892680.8.4.291
Archer, J. (2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(3–4), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09990951
Arnocky, S., Desrochers, J., Rotella, A., Albert, G., Hodges-Simeon, C., Locke, A., & Kelly, B. (2021). Men’s mate value correlates with a less restricted sociosexual orientation: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(8), 3663–3673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01937-6
Arnocky, S., Proietti, V., Ruddick, E. L., Côté, T. R., Ortiz, T. L., Hodson, G., & Carré, J. M. (2019). Aggression toward sexualized women is mediated by decreased perceptions of humanness. Psychological Science, 30(5), 748–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619836106
Arnocky, S., Ribout, A., Mirza, R. S., & Knack, J. M. (2014). Perceived mate availability influences intrasexual competition, jealousy and mate-guarding behavior. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 12(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1556/jep.12.2014.1.3
Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2012). A multi-informant longitudinal study on the relationship between aggression, peer victimization, and dating status in adolescence. Evolutionary Psychology, 10(2): 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491201000207
Arnocky, S., Woodruff, N., & Schmitt, D. P. (2016). Men’s sociosexuality is sensitive to changes in mate availability. Personal Relationships, 23(1), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12118
Björkqvist, K. (2018). Gender differences in aggression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 39–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.030
Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1992)18:2%3C117::AIDAB2480180205%3E3.0.CO;2-3
Blake, K. R., Bastian, B., Denson, T. F., Grosjean, P., & Brooks, R. C. (2018). Income inequality not gender inequality positively covaries with female sexualization on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(35), 8722–8727. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717959115
Borau, S., & Bonnefon, J. F. (2019). The imaginary intrasexual competition: Advertisements featuring provocative female models trigger women to engage in indirect aggression. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3643-y
Buss, D. M., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Beam, D. (2017). The mate switching hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.022
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.204
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 77–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Human aggression in evolutionary psychological perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 17(6), 605–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00037-8
Buunk, A. P., & Fisher, M. (2009). Individual differences in intrasexual competition. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1556/jep.7.2009.1.5
Buunk, A. P., & Massar, K. (2021). Intimate partner violence in Nicaragua: The role of possessive jealousy, intrasexual competitiveness, life history, mate value, and stress. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(15–16). https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519842854
Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women’s intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001818
Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79(5), 1185–1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x
Coyne, S. M., & Archer, J. (2004). Indirect aggression in the media: A content analysis of British television programs. Aggressive Behavior, 30(3), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20022
Cross, C. P. (2010). Sex differences in same-sex direct aggression and sociosexuality: The role of risky impulsivity. Evolutionary Psychology, 8(4), 779–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491000800418
Daly, M. (2016). Killing the competition: Economic inequality and homicide (1st ed). Routledge.
Davis, A. C, Arnocky, S., Mackinnon, M. A., & McKelvie, L. (in press). Men’s extra-pair sexual interest. In T. K. Shackelford (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of evolutionary perspectives on sexual psychology. Cambridge University Press
Davis, A. C., Brittain, H., Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2022). Longitudinal associations between primary and secondary psychopathic traits, delinquency, and current dating status in adolescence. Evolutionary Psychology, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/14747049211068670
Fernández del Río, E., Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J., Castro, Á., & Barrada, J. R. (2019). Sociosexuality and bright and dark personality: The prediction of behavior, attitude, and desire to engage in casual sex. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(15), Article 2731. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16152731
Fiacco, S., Palm-Fischbacher, S., Campbell, J., & Ehlert, U. (2019). Measuring female intrasexual competition by the scale for intrasexual competition: A validation of the German version. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 22(2), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-018-0890-6
Forrest, S., Eatough, V., & Shevlin, M. (2005). Measuring adult indirect aggression: The development and psychometric assessment of the indirect aggression scales. Aggressive Behavior, 31(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20074
Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(4), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000337X
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Gangestad, S. W., Perea, E. F., Shapiro, J. R., & Kenrick, D. T. (2009). Aggress to impress: Hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 980–994. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013907
Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford.
Holtzman, N. S., & Strube, M. J. (2011). The intertwined evolution of narcissism and short-term mating: An emerging hypothesis. In K. W. Campbell & J. D. Miller (Eds.), The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments (pp. 210–220). Wiley.
Holtzman, N. S., & Strube, M. J. (2013). Above and beyond short-term mating, long-term mating is uniquely tied to human personality. Evolutionary Psychology, 11(5), 1101–1129. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491301100514
Jackson, J. J., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2007). The structure and measurement of human mating strategies: Toward a multidimensional model of sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(6), 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.04.005
Jonason, P. K., Girgis, M., & Milne-Home, J. (2017). The exploitive mating strategy of the dark triad traits: Tests of rape-enabling attitudes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(3), 697–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0937-1
Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., Webster, G. D., & Schmitt, D. P. (2009). The dark triad: Facilitating a short‐term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality, 23(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.698
Jonason, P. K., Valentine, K. A., Li, N. P., & Harbeson, C. L. (2011). Mate-selection and the dark triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy and creating a volatile environment Personality and Individual Differences, 51(6), 759–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.025
Kardum, I., Hudek-Knežević, J., & Gračanin, A. (2006). Sociosexuality and mate retention in romantic couples. Psihologijske Teme, 15(2), 277–296. https://hrcak.srce.hr/9282
Kennair, L. E. O., & Bendixen, M. (2012). Sociosexuality as predictor of sexual harassment and coercion in female and male high school students. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(5), 479–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.01.001
Lalumière, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1996). Sexual deviance, antisociality, mating effort, and the use of sexually coercive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00059-1
Li, N. P., Smith, A. R., Griskevicius, V., Cason, M. J., & Bryan, A. (2010). Intrasexual competition and eating restriction in heterosexual and homosexual individuals. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.05.004
Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1113–1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113
Reise, S. P., & Wright, T. M. (1996). Personality traits, Cluster B personality disorders, and sociosexuality. Journal of Research in Personality, 30(1), 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1996.0009
Semenyna, S. W., Vasey, P. L., & Honey, P. L. (2019). Replicating the relationships between dark triad traits and female mate-competition tactics in undergraduate women. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.028
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(2), 247–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000051
Schmitt, D. P., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Big Five traits related to short-term mating: From personality to promiscuity across 46 nations. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(2), 246–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600204
Seal, D. W., & Agostinelli, G. (1994). Individual differences associated with high-risk sexual behaviour: Implications for intervention programmes. AIDS Care, 6(4), 393–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540129408258653
Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 870–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870
Simpson, J. A., Gangestad, S. W., & Biek, M. (1993). Personality and nonverbal social behavior: An ethological perspective of relationship initiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29(5), 434–461. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1993.1020
Simpson, J. A., Gangestad, S. W., Christensen, P. N., & Leck, K. (1999). Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality, and intrasexual competitive tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.159
Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87(2), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.24510.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford University Press.
Thomas, A. G., & Stewart-Williams, S. (2018). Mating strategy flexibility in the laboratory: Preferences for long-and short-term mating change in response to evolutionarily relevant variables. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.10.004
Thomas, A. G., Stone, B., Bennett, P., Stewart-Williams, S., & Kennair, L. E. O. (2021). Sex differences in voyeuristic and exhibitionistic interests: Exploring the mediating roles of sociosexuality and sexual compulsivity from an evolutionary perspective. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(5), 2151–2162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01991-0
Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368(1631), Article 20130080. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0080
Vaillancourt, T., & Farrell, A. H. (2021). Mean kids become mean adults: Trajectories of indirect aggression from age 10 to 22. Aggressive Behavior, 47(4), 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21950
Vaillancourt, T., & Sharma, A. (2011). Intolerance of sexy peers: Intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behavior, 37(6), 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20413
Wagstaff, D. L. (2018). Comparing mating motivations, social processes, and personality as predictors of women’s cosmetics use. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 12(4), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000119
Walker, D. F., Tokar, D. M., & Fischer, A. R. (2000). What are eight popular masculinity-related instruments measuring? Underlying dimensions and their relations to sociosexuality. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 1(2), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.1.2.98
Westerlund, M., Santtila, P., Johansson, A., Varjonen, M., Witting, K., Jern, P., & Sandnabba, N. K. (2010). Does unrestricted sociosexual behaviour have a shared genetic basis with sexual coercion? Psychology, Crime & Law, 16(1–2), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802621925
White, D. D., Gallup, A. C., & Gallup Jr, G. G. (2010). Indirect peer aggression in adolescence and reproductive behavior. Evolutionary Psychology, 8(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491000800106
Yost, M. R., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2006). Gender differences in the enactment of sociosexuality: An examination of implicit social motives, sexual fantasies, coercive sexual attitudes, and aggressive sexual behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 43(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552311
Acknowledgements
Adam C. Davis is supported by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Postdoctoral Fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ACD wrote the manuscript draft and conducted the analyses. SA designed the larger research project that the current study was a part of and collected the data. GA and SA helped to review and edit the manuscript draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
This study received approval from an appointment Institutional Research Ethics Board at Nipissing University.
Consent to Participate
All individuals provided informed consent to participate in the current study.
Consent to Publication
All individuals were informed that the researchers planned to publish key findings in peer-reviewed journals.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davis, A.C., Albert, G. & Arnocky, S. Intrasexual Competitiveness Mediates the Link Between Unrestricted Sociosexuality and Indirect Aggression. Evolutionary Psychological Science 9, 50–60 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-022-00331-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-022-00331-2