Abstract
Though much research has explored how facial and bodily features connote heritable fitness, particularly in the context of short-term mating, such cues similarly may influence perceptions of potential parenting ability. The current study explored how body fat variation and breast size in female targets and body fat and muscularity variation in male targets influence men’s and women’s perceptions of targets’ positive (e.g., nurturance) and negative (e.g., hostility) parenting capacities. Participants viewed 4 female targets orthogonally manipulated along dimensions of adiposity (high vs. low) and breast size (small vs. large), and 4 male targets orthogonally manipulated along similar adiposity dimensions and muscularity (small vs. large) before indicating targets’ inferred parenting ability. High-fat female targets were perceived to have more positive and less negative parenting abilities relative to low-fat female targets, an effect that was most pronounced among women; breast size did not influence perceptions of female parenting ability. For male targets, high fat and small muscles were perceived as more indicative of positive parenting abilities and less indicative toward negative abilities; the low body fat/high muscle male target was perceived to have especially negative parenting abilities. These results suggest body cues often associated with good genes and short-term mating success also systematically influence perceptions of parenting ability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
01 February 2020
The original version of this article contained an error in how the results of a prior research study were reported.
References
Arnocky, S., Piché, T., Albert, G., Ouellette, D., & Barclay, P. (2017). Altruism predicts mating success in humans. British Journal of Psychology, 108, 416–435.
Barclay, P. (2010). Altruism as a courtship display: some effects of third-party generosity on audience perceptions. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 123–135.
Beall, A. T., & Schaller, M. (2019). Evolution, motivation, and the mating/parenting trade–off. Self and Identity, 18, 39–59.
Bentley, G., & Mace, R. (Eds.). (2012). Substitute parents: biological and social perspectives on all parenting in human societies (Vol. 3). Berghahn Books.
Brooks, R. C., Shelly, J. P., Jordan, L. A., & Dixson, B. J. (2015). The multivariate evolution of female body shape in an artificial digital ecosystem. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 351–358.
Brown, M., & Sacco, D. F. (2019). Is pulling the lever sexy? Deontology as a downstream cue to long-term mate quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 957–976.
Brown, M., & Sacco, D. F. (2018). Put a (limbal) ring on it: women perceive men’s limbal rings as a health cue in short-term mating domains. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 80–91.
Brown, M., & Sacco, D. F. (2017). Unrestricted sociosexuality predicts preferences for extraverted male faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 123–127.
Brown, M., Sacco, D. F., & Medlin, M. M. (2019). Sociosexual attitudes differentially predict men and women’s preferences for agreeable male faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 248–251.
Buckels, E. E., Beall, A. T., Hofer, M. K., Lin, E. Y., Zhou, Z., & Schaller, M. (2015). Individual differences in activation of the parental care motivational system: assessment, prediction, and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 497.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204.
Dixson, B. J., & Brooks, R. C. (2013). The role of facial hair in women’s perceptions of men’s attractiveness, health, masculinity and parenting abilities. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 236–241.
Dixson, B. J., Duncan, M., & Dixson, A. F. (2015). The role of breast size and areolar pigmentation in perceptions of women’s sexual attractiveness, reproductive health, sexual maturity, maternal nurturing abilities, and age. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1685–1695.
Dixson, B. J., Kennedy-Costantini, S., Lee, A. J., & Nelson, N. L. (2019). Mothers are sensitive to men’s beards as a potential cue of paternal investment. Hormones and Behavior, 113, 55–66.
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–587.
Gettler, L. T. (2010). Direct male care and hominin evolution: why male–child interaction is more than a nice social idea. American Anthropologist, 112, 7–21.
Gray, P. B., & Frederick, D. A. (2012). Body image and body type preferences in St. Kitts, Caribbean: a cross-cultural comparison with US samples regarding attitudes towards muscularity, body fat, and breast size. Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 631–655.
Farrelly, D. (2013). Altruism as an indicator of good parenting quality in long-term relationships: further investigations using the mate preferences towards altruistic traits scale. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 395–398.
Frederick, D. A., & Haselton, M. G. (2007). Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1167–1183.
Havlíček, J., Třebický, V., Valentova, J. V., Kleisner, K., Akoko, R. M., Fialová, J., et al. (2017). Men’s preferences for women’s breast size and shape in four cultures. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 217–226.
Hill, A. K., Hunt, J., Welling, L. L., Cárdenas, R. A., Rotella, M. A., Wheatley, J. R., et al. (2013a). Quantifying the strength and form of sexual selection on men’s traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 334–341.
Hill, S. E., Rodeheffer, C. D., DelPriore, D. J., & Butterfield, M. E. (2013b). Ecological contingencies in women’s calorie regulation psychology: a life history approach. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 888–897.
Holzleitner, I. J., & Perrett, D. I. (2016). Perception of strength from 3D faces is linked to facial cues of physique. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 217–229.
Jones, B. C., Hahn, A. C., Fisher, C. I., Wang, H., Kandrik, M., Han, C., et al. (2018). No compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity track changes in women’s hormonal status. Psychological Science, 29, 996–1005.
Katz, K. A., Nilsson, I., & Rasmussen, K. M. (2010). Danish health care providers’ perception of breastfeeding difficulty experienced by women who are obese, have large breasts, or both. Journal of Human Lactation, 26, 138–147.
Kerry, N., & Murray, D. R. (2019). Politics and parental care: experimental and mediational tests of the causal link between parenting motivation and social conservatism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1948550619853598.
Kleiman, D. G., & Malcolm, J. R. (1981). The evolution of male parental investment in mammals. In Parental care in mammals (pp. 347–387). Springer, Boston, MA.
Krems, J. A., Kenrick, D. T., & Neel, R. (2017). Individual perceptions of self-actualization: what functional motives are linked to fulfilling one’s full potential? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 1337–1352.
Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. (2019). Evidence supporting nubility and reproductive value as the key to human female physical attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior.
Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. (2009). Costs and benefits of fat-free muscle mass in men: relationship to mating success, dietary requirements, and native immunity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 322–328.
Lee, A. J., Dubbs, S. L., Kelly, A. J., von Hippel, W., Brooks, R. C., & Zietsch, B. P. (2012). Human facial attributes, but not perceived intelligence, are used as cues of health and resource provision potential. Behavioral Ecology, 24, 779–787.
Li, N. P., Yong, J. C., Tov, W., Sng, O., Fletcher, G. J., Valentine, K. A., et al. (2013). Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 757.
Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Feinberg, D. R., & Perrett, D. I. (2014). Men’s strategic preferences for femininity in female faces. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 364–381.
Lovejoy, M. C., Weis, R., O’Hare, E., & Rubin, E. C. (1999). Development and initial validation of the Parent Behavior Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 11, 534.
Lukaszewski, A. W., Larson, C. M., Gildersleeve, K. A., Roney, J. R., & Haselton, M. G. (2014). Condition-dependent calibration of men’s uncommitted mating orientation: evidence from multiple samples. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 319–326.
McPherson, E., Banchefsky, S., & Park, B. (2018). Psychological consequences of the dad bod: using biological and physical changes to increase essentialist perceptions of fathers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 330–336.
Mobbs, O., Crépin, C., Thiéry, C., Golay, A., & Van der Linden, M. (2010). Obesity and the four facets of impulsivity. Patient Education and Counseling, 79, 372–377.
Nelson, L. D., & Morrison, E. L. (2005). The symptoms of resource scarcity: judgments of food and finances influence preferences for potential partners. Psychological Science, 16, 167–173.
Pirlott, A. G., & Cook, C. L. (2018). Prejudices and discrimination as goal activated and threat driven: the affordance management approach applied to sexual prejudice. Psychological Review, 125, 1002.
Quinlan, R. J., & Quinlan, M. B. (2007). Evolutionary ecology of human pair-bonds: cross-cultural tests of alternative hypotheses. Cross-Cultural Research, 41, 149–169.
Rasmussen, E. B., Lawyer, S. R., & Reilly, W. (2010b). Percent body fat is related to delay and probability discounting for food in humans. Behavioural Processes, 83, 23–30.
Rasmussen, K. M., Abrams, B., Bodnar, L. M., Butte, N. F., Catalano, P. M., & Siega-Riz, A. M. (2010a). Recommendations for weight gain during pregnancy in the context of the obesity epidemic. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 116, 1191.
Schmitt, D. P., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Big Five traits related to short-term mating: from personality to promiscuity across 46 nations. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 147470490800600204.
Sell, A., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2009). Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 15073–15078.
Snyder, J. K., Fessler, D. M., Tiokhin, L., Frederick, D. A., Lee, S. W., & Navarrete, C. D. (2011). Trade-offs in a dangerous world: women’s fear of crime predicts preferences for aggressive and formidable mates. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 127–137.
Smith, M. J. L., Deady, D. K., Moore, F. R., Jones, B. C., Cornwell, R. E., Stirrat, M., et al. (2012). Maternal tendencies in women are associated with estrogen levels and facial femininity. Hormones and Behavior, 61, 12–16.
Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2013). Resource security impacts men’s female breast size preferences. PLoS One, 8, e57623.
Tinlin, R. M., Watkins, C. D., Welling, L. L., DeBruine, L. M., Al-Dujaili, E. A., & Jones, B. C. (2013). Perceived facial adiposity conveys information about women’s health. British Journal of Psychology, 104, 235–248.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Aldinc: Chicago.
von Borell, C. J., Kordsmeyer, T. L., Gerlach, T. M., & Penke, L. (2019). An integrative study of facultative personality calibration. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40, 235–248.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sacco, D.F., Holifield, K., Drea, K. et al. Dad and Mom Bods? Inferences of Parenting Ability from Bodily Cues. Evolutionary Psychological Science 6, 207–214 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00229-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00229-x