Abstract
Sex differences in mating-relevant attitudes and behaviors are well established in the literature and seem to be robust throughout decades and cultures. However, recent research claimed that sex differences are “overrated”, and individual differences in mating strategies (beyond sex) are more important than sex differences. In our current research, we explore between-sex as well as within-sex differences; further we distinguish between short-term and long-term relationship orientation and their interactions with sex for predicting mate preferences. In Study 1, we analyzed a large dataset (n = 21,245) on long-term mate characteristics. In Study 2 (n = 283), participants indicated their preference for long-term as well as short-term partners. The results demonstrate the necessity to include both intersexual as well as intrasexual differences in mating strategies. Our results question the claim that sex differences in mate preferences are “overrated.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888.
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4.
Arnocky, S., Ribout, A., Mirza, R. S., & Knack, J. M. (2014). Perceived mate availability influences intrasexual competition, jealousy, and mate-guarding behavior. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.12.2014.1.3.
Arnocky, S., Woodruff, N., & Schmitt, D. P. (2016). Men's sociosexuality is sensitive to changes in mate availability. Personal Relationships, 23, 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12118.
Asendorpf, J. B., & Penke, L. (2005). A mature evolutionary psychology demands careful conclusions about sex differences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 275–276. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05220058.
Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2000). The neural basis of romantic love. Neuroreport, 11, 3829–3834. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200011270-00046.
Bech-Sørensen, J., & Pollet, T. V. (2016). Sex differences in mate preferences: a replication study, 20 years later. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2, 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-016-0048-6.
Bendixen, M., Asao, K., Wyckoff, J. P., Buss, D. M., & Kennair, L. E. O. (2017). Sexual regret in US and Norway: effects of culture and individual differences in religiosity and mating strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 246–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.054.
Bendixen, M., & Kennair, L. E. O. (2017). Advances in the understanding of same-sex and opposite-sex sexual harassment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 583–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.01.001.
Brown, N. R., & Sinclair, R. C. (1999). Estimating number of lifetime sexual partners: men and women do it differently. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551999.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023992.
Buss, D. M. (2006). Strategies of human mating. Psychological Topics, 15, 239–260.
Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559.
Buss, D. M., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Beam, D. (2017). The mate switching hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.022.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 77–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408.
Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2001). A half century of mate preferences: the cultural evolution of values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00491.x.
Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fetchenhauer, D., & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal Relationships, 9, 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00018.
Carter, S. C. (1998). Neuroendocrine perspective on social perspectives on social attachment and love. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23, 779–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4530(98)00055-9.
Clark, A. P. (2006). Are the correlates of sociosexuality different for men and women? Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1321–1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.05.006.
Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.245.
Eastwick, P. W., Luchies, L. B., Finkel, E. J., & Hunt, L. L. (2014). The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: a review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 623–665. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032432.
Farrelly, D. (2011). Cooperation as a signal of genetic or phenotypic quality in female mate choice? Evidence from preferences across the menstrual cycle. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 406–430. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712610X532896.
Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: a test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.125.
Fisher, H. E. (1998). Lust, attraction, and attachment in mammalian reproduction. Human Nature, 9, 23–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-998-1010-5.
Fisher, H. E., Aron, A., Mashek, D., Li, H., & Brown, L. L. (2002). Defining the brain systems of lust, romantic attraction, and attachment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 413–419. https://doi.org/10.1023/a1019888024255.
Gangestad, S. W., & Buss, D. M. (1993). Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(93)90009-7.
Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2006). Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychological Inquiry, 17(2), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1702_1.
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000337X.
Greiling, H., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Women's sexual strategies: the hidden dimension of extra-pair mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 929–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00151-8.
Hallam, L., de Backer, C. J. S., Fisher, M. L., & Walrave, M. (2018). Are sex differences in mating strategies overrated? Sociosexual orientation as a dominant predictor in online dating strategies. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 4, 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0150-z.
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Methodology in the social sciences [2nd ed.]. New York: Guilford Press
Hill, R. (1945). Campus values in mate selection. Journal of Home Economics, 37, 554–558.
Hitsch, G. J., Hortaçsu, A., & Ariely, D. (2010). What makes you click?—Mate preferences in online dating. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 8, 393–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-010-9088-6.
Jackson, J. J., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2007). The structure and measurement of human mating strategies: Toward a multidimensional model of sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.04.005.
Johnson, A. M., Wadsworth, J., Wellings, K., Bradshaw, S., & Field, J. (1992). Sexual lifestyles and HIV risk. Nature, 360, 410–412. https://doi.org/10.1038/360410a0.
Jonason, P. K., & Buss, D. M. (2012). Avoiding entangling commitments: tactics for implementing a short-term mating strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 606–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.015.
Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., Webster, G. D., & Schmitt, D. P. (2009). The dark triad: facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality, 23, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.698.
Jonason, P. K., Teicher, E. A., & Schmitt, D. P. (2011). The TIPI’s validity confirmed: associations with sociosexuality and self-esteem. Individual Differences Research, 9, 52–60.
Kennair, L. E. O., & Bendixen, M. (2012). Sociosexuality as predictor of sexual harassment and coercion in female and male high school students. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 479–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.01.001.
Kennair, L. E. O., Bendixen, M., & Buss, D. M. (2016). Sexual regret: tests of competing explanations of sex differences. Evolutionary Psychology, 14, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916682903.
Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R., & Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 951–969. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.64.6.951.
Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., Groth, G., & Trost, M. R. (1990). Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality, 58, 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00909.x.
Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947–955. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.947.
Li, N. P., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468–489. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.468.
Lippa, R. A. (2007). The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: an examination of biological and cultural influences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9151-2.
March, E., Van Doorn, G., & Grieve, R. (2018). Netflix and chill? What sex differences can tell us about mate preferences in (hypothetical) booty-call relationships. Evolutionary Psychology, 16, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704918812138.
Mitchell, K. R., Mercer, C. H., Prah, P., Clifton, S., Tanton, C., Wellings, K., & Copas, A. (2019). Why do men report more opposite-sex sexual partners than women? Analysis of the gender discrepancy in a British national probability survey. The Journal of Sex Research, 56, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.1481193.
Muggleton, N. K., & Fincher, C. L. (2017). Unrestricted sexuality promotes distinctive short-and long-term mate preferences in women. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.054.
Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: a more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113–1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113.
Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993-2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017504.
Rammsayer, T. H., Borter, N., & Troche, S. J. (2017). The effects of sex and gender-role characteristics on facets of sociosexuality in heterosexual young adults. Journal of Sex Research, 54, 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1236903.
Regan, P. C. (1998). Minimum mate selection standards as a function of perceived mate value, relationship context, and gender. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 10, 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v10n01_04.
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, F. S., & Gate, R. (2000). Partner preferences. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 12, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v12n03_01.
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: a 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000051.
Schwarz, S. (2008). Das 2D:4D-Fingerlängenverhältnis und die Vermeidung von Nähe als mögliche Determinanten der Beziehungsorientierung [Possible determinants of relationship orientation: 2D:4D finger length ratio and avoidant attachment]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bergische Universität,Wuppertal
Schwarz, S., & Baßfeld, L. (2018). Do men help only beautiful women in social networks? Current Psychology, 38, 965–976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0086-2.
Schwarz, S., & Hassebrauck, M. (2007). Interindividuelle Unterschiede in Beziehungspräferenzen. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 38, 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1024/0044-3514.38.3.179.
Schwarz, S., & Hassebrauck, M. (2012). Sex and age differences in mate-selection preferences. Human Nature, 23, 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-012-9152-x.
Schwarz, S., Mustafić, M., Hassebrauck, M., & Jörg, J. (2011). Short- and long-term relationship orientation and 2D:4D finger-length ratio. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 565–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9698-9.
Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.023.
Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870.
Simpson, J. A., Wilson, C. L., & Winterheld, H. A. (2004). Sociosexuality and romantic relationships. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The Handbook of Sexuality in Close Relationships (pp. 87–112). Mahwah: LEA.
Sprecher, S., Sullivan, Q., & Hatfield, E. (1994). Mate selection preferences: gender differences examined in a national sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1074–1080. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.6.1074.
Sprecher, S., Treger, S., & Sakaluk, J. K. (2013). Premarital sexual standards and sociosexuality: gender, ethnicity, and cohort differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1395–1405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0145-6.
Stewart, S., Stinnett, H., & Rosenfeld, L. B. (2000). Sex differences in desired characteristics of short-term and long-term relationship partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 843–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407500176008.
Storz, C. (2001). Soziale Kognitionsprozesse bei der Partnerwahl: Der Einfluß von Prototypen auf die Wahrnehmung und Beurteilung potentieller Partner [Social cognition in mate choice: the impact of prototypes on the perception and evaluation of potential partners]. Hamburg: Kovač
Thomas, A. G., Jonason, P. K., Blackburn, J., Kennair, L. E. O., Lowe, R., Malouff, J., et al. (2019). Mate preference priorities in the East and West: a cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model. Journal of Personality, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12514.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871-1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.
Waynforth, D. (2001). Mate choice trade-offs and women’s preference for physically attractive men. Human Nature, 12, 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-001-1007-9.
Webster, G. D., & Bryan, A. (2007). Sociosexual attitudes and behaviors: why two factors are better than one. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 917–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.08.007.
Wiederman, M. W. (1997). The truth must be in here somewhere: examining the gender discrepancy in self-reported lifetime number of sex partners. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499709551905.
Wiederman, M., & Dubios, S. L. (1998). Evolution and sex differences in preferences for short-term mates results from a policy capturing study. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00006-3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict(s) of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Statement of Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants. The participants were encouraged to contact the authors for any questions.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schwarz, S., Klümper, L. & Hassebrauck, M. Are Sex Differences in Mating Preferences Really “Overrated”? The Effects of Sex and Relationship Orientation on Long-Term and Short-Term Mate Preferences. Evolutionary Psychological Science 6, 174–187 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-019-00223-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-019-00223-y