Urban Civility: City Dwellers Are Not Less Prososcial Than Their Rural Counterparts
Urban living is often thought to promote incivility, but the existing sociological evidence paints a mixed picture. We aimed to examine the urban incivility phenomenon from an evolutionist’s perspective. Small communities are expected to show a higher incidence of helping because the applicability of theories such as kin selection, direct reciprocity and indirect reciprocity to acts of cooperative behaviour is augmented in small-scale demographic settings. Smaller communities have a reduced total pool of individuals to interact with, increasing the likelihood of encountering any given individual multiple times. This makes it easier for individuals to form cooperative relationships with one another, which may facilitate prosociality within smaller communities. Using the lost letter technique, our results show that city dwelling, compared with rural residence, per se does not negatively influence prosociality. This contradicts the expected erosion of cooperative behaviour in anonymous cities and adds to our understanding of the interplay between human macroecology and individual behavioural tendencies.
KeywordsCooperation Prosociality Lost letter experiment Urban incivility
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Ethics was granted by the Human Research Ethics Community in accordance with the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (National Health and Medical Research Council 2015; reference number RA/4/1/8257).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Alexander, R. D. (1987). The biology of moral systems. Carmel, IN: Hawthorne.Google Scholar
- Australian Bureau of Statistics 2013, Census of population and housing: socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA), Australia, 2011, cat. no. 2033.0.55.001, ABS, Canberra. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/2033.0.55.0012011?OpenDocument. [7 May 2016].
- Australian Bureau of Statistics 2014, IRSAD, Australian Government. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/2033.0.55.001main+features100042011/ [9 May 2016].
- Grueter, C. C., Westlake, G., & Coall, D. in prep. Absence of intergroup discrimination in a naturalistic helping task.Google Scholar
- Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: why doesn’t he help? New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
- R Core Team. (2014). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
- Reysen, S, and Levine RV. (2014). People, culture, and place: How place predicts helping toward strangers. In Rentfrow PJ (ed.), Geographical Psychology, pp. 241–60. Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.Google Scholar
- Westlake, G., Coall, D., & Grueter CC. submitted. Educational attainment fosters unconditional helping behavior: a natural experiment.Google Scholar