Mate Retention Strategies of Dominance-Oriented and Prestige-Oriented Romantic Partners

  • Kyle E. ConlonEmail author
Research Article


What mate retention strategies do dominance-oriented and prestige-oriented romantic partners use to keep their relationships intact? In the current study, 329 participants in committed romantic relationships completed measures of their dominance orientation, prestige orientation, and mate retention behavior. It was predicted that dominance-oriented partners would engage in tactics designed to force or coerce relationship commitment, whereas prestige-oriented partners (primarily men) would engage in tactics such as resource display and avoid costly strategies such as rival violence. Results confirmed these hypotheses. Dominance-oriented individuals imposed costs on their partners and intrasexual rivals; prestige-oriented individuals, in contrast, attempted to increase their partners’ satisfaction by enhancing positive aspects of their relationships. These results suggest that romantic partners engage in strategic mate retention tactics corresponding with their dispositional levels of dominance and prestige motivation. Implications for relationship satisfaction and partner-directed violence are discussed.


Mate retention Dominance Prestige Evolutionary psychology 



The author would like to thank Lauren E. Brewer for helpful suggestions on a previous version of this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the studies.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.


  1. Ainsworth, S. E., & Maner, J. K. (2012). Sex begets violence: mating motives, social dominance, and physical aggression in men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 819–829. Scholar
  2. Atari, M. (2017). Assessment of long-term mate preferences in Iran. Evolutionary Psychology, 15, 1–17. Scholar
  3. Atari, M., Barbaro, N., Sela, Y., Shackelford, T. K., & Chegeni, R. (2017). The Big Five personality dimensions and mate retention behaviors in Iran. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 286–290. Scholar
  4. Barbaro, N., Sela, Y., Atari, M., Shackelford, T. K., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2019). Romantic attachment and mate retention behavior: the mediating role of perceived risk of partner infidelity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 940–956. Scholar
  5. Bech-Sørensen, J., & Pollet, T. V. (2016). Sex differences in mate preferences: a replication study, 20 years later. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2, 171–176. Scholar
  6. Brem, M. J., Spiller, L. C., & Vandehey, M. A. (2015). Online mate-retention tactics on Facebook are associated with relationship aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 2831–2850. Scholar
  7. Burn, S. M., & Ward, A. Z. (2005). Men’s conformity to traditional masculinity and relationship satisfaction. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 6, 254–263. Scholar
  8. Buss, D. M. (1988). From vigilance to violence: tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 291–317. Scholar
  9. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14. Scholar
  10. Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 346–361. Scholar
  11. Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., & McKibben, W. F. (2008). The mate retention inventory-short form (MRI-SF). Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 322–334. Scholar
  12. Campbell, A. (2004). Female competition: causes, constraints, content, and contexts. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 16–26. Scholar
  13. Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., & Henrich, J. (2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 334–347. Scholar
  14. Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 103–125. Scholar
  15. Cowlishaw, G., & Dunbar, R. I. (1991). Dominance rank and mating success in male primates. Animal Behaviour, 41, 1045–1056. Scholar
  16. de Miguel, A., & Buss, D. M. (2011). Mate retention tactics in Spain: personality, sex differences, and relationship status. Journal of Personality, 79, 563–585. Scholar
  17. de Waal-Andrews, W., Gregg, A. P., & Lammers, J. (2015). When status is grabbed and when status is granted: getting ahead in dominance and prestige hierarchies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 445–464. Scholar
  18. Dodge, K. A., & Somberg, D. R. (1987). Hostile attributional biases among aggressive boys are exacerbated under conditions of threats to the self. Child Development, 58, 213–224. Scholar
  19. Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fieder, M., & Huber, S. (2012). An evolutionary account of status, power, and career in modern societies. Human Nature, 23, 191–207. Scholar
  21. Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., Euler, H. A., Hoier, S., Schmitt, D. P., & LaMunyon, C. W. (2005). Mate retention, semen displacement, and human sperm competition: a preliminary investigation of tactics to prevent and correct female infidelity. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 749–763. Scholar
  22. Goncalves, M. K., & Campbell, L. (2014). The Dark Triad and the derogation of mating competitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 42–46. Scholar
  23. Hall, J. A., Coats, E. J., & LeBeau, L. S. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 898–924. Scholar
  24. Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165–196. Scholar
  25. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466, 29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hill, A. K., Hunt, J., Welling, L. L., Cárdenas, R. A., Rotella, M. A., Wheatley, J. R., et al. (2013). Quantifying the strength and form of sexual selection on men’s traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 334–341. Scholar
  27. Holden, C. J., Shackelford, T. K., Zeigler-Hill, V., Miner, E. J., Kaighobadi, F., Starratt, V. G., Jeffery, A. J., & Buss, D. M. (2014). Husband’s esteem predicts his mate retention tactics. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 655–672. Scholar
  28. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Hutchinson, G. (1993). Attributing negative intent to wife behavior: the attributions of maritally violent versus nonviolent men. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 206–211. Scholar
  29. Johnson, R. T., Burk, J. A., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2007). Dominance and prestige as differential predictors of aggression and testosterone levels in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 345–351. Scholar
  30. Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Buss, D. M. (2010). The costs and benefits of the Dark Triad: implications for mate poaching and mate retention tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 373–378. Scholar
  31. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Different provocations trigger aggression in narcissists and psychopaths. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 12–18. Scholar
  32. Kaighobadi, F., Starratt, V. G., Shackelford, T. K., & Popp, D. (2008). Male mate retention mediates the relationship between female sexual infidelity and female-directed violence. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1422–1431. Scholar
  33. Kaighobadi, F., Shackelford, T. K., & Goetz, A. T. (2009). From mate retention to murder: evolutionary psychological perspectives on men’s partner-directed violence. Review of General Psychology, 13, 327–334. Scholar
  34. Kardum, I., Hudek-Knežević, J., & Gračanin, A. (2006). Sociosexuality and mate retention in romantic couples. Psychological Topics, 15, 277–296.Google Scholar
  35. Kruger, D. J., & Fitzgerald, C. J. (2011). Reproductive strategies and relationship preferences associated with prestigious and dominant men. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 365–369. Scholar
  36. Lopes, G. S., Shackelford, T. K., Santos, W. S., Farias, M. G., & Segundo, D. S. (2016). Mate retention inventory-short form (MRI-SF): adaptation to the Brazilian context. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 36–40. Scholar
  37. Maner, J. K. (2017). Dominance and prestige: a tale of two hierarchies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 526–531. Scholar
  38. Maner, J. K., & Case, C. R. (2016). Dominance and prestige: dual strategies for navigating social hierarchies. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 129–180. Scholar
  39. Marazziti, D., Consoli, G., Albanese, F., Laquidara, E., Baroni, S., & Catena Dell’osso, M. (2010). Romantic attachment and subtypes/dimensions of jealousy. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 6, 53–58. Scholar
  40. Mellor, D., Stokes, M., Firth, L., Hayashi, Y., & Cummins, R. (2008). Need for belonging, relationship satisfaction, loneliness, and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 213–218. Scholar
  41. Miner, E. J., Shackelford, T. K., & Starratt, V. G. (2009a). Mate value of romantic partners predicts men’s partner-directed verbal insults. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 135–139. Scholar
  42. Miner, E. J., Starratt, V. G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2009b). It’s not all about her: men’s mate value and mate retention. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 214–218. Scholar
  43. Ostrov, J. M., & Collins, W. A. (2007). Social dominance in romantic relationships: a prospective longitudinal study of non-verbal processes. Social Development, 16, 580–595. Scholar
  44. Pazhoohi, F., Jahromi, A. S., & Doyle, J. F. (2016). Mate retention tactics decline with age of Iranian men. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2, 165–170. Scholar
  45. Pham, M. N., Shackelford, T. K., Holden, C. J., Zeigler-Hill, V., Sela, Y., & Jeffrey, A. J. (2015). Men’s benefit-provisioning mate retention behavior mediates the relationship between their agreeableness and their oral sex behaviors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1723–1728. Scholar
  46. Pillsworth, E. G., & Haselton, M. G. (2006). Male sexual attractiveness predicts differential ovulatory shifts in female extra-pair attraction and male mate retention. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 247–258. Scholar
  47. Sadalla, E. K., Kenrick, D. T., & Vershure, B. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 730–738. Scholar
  48. Salkicevic, S., Stanic, A. L., & Grabovac, M. T. (2014). Good mates retain us right: investigating the relationship between mate retention strategies, mate value, and relationship satisfaction. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 1038–1052. Scholar
  49. Sela, Y., Shackelford, T. K., Pham, M. N., & Euler, H. A. (2015). Do women perform fellatio as a mate retention behavior? Personality and Individual Differences, 73, 61–66. Scholar
  50. Setchell, J. M., Charpentier, M., & Wickings, E. J. (2005). Mate guarding and paternity in mandrills: factors influencing alpha male monopoly. Animal Behaviour, 70, 1105–1120. Scholar
  51. Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (1997). Cues to infidelity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1034–1045. Scholar
  52. Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Marital satisfaction and spousal cost-infliction. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 917–928. Scholar
  53. Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., Buss, D. M., Euler, H. A., & Hoier, S. (2005a). When we hurt the ones we love: predicting violence against women from men’s mate retention. Personal Relationships, 12, 447–463. Scholar
  54. Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005b). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 447–458. Scholar
  55. Shi, L. (2003). The association between adult attachment styles and conflict resolution in romantic relationships. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 143–157. Scholar
  56. Snyder, J. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Barrett, H. C. (2008). The dominance dilemma: do women really prefer dominant mates? Personal Relationships, 15, 425–444. Scholar
  57. The Police. (1983). Every breath you take. In On Synchronicity [CD]. Quebec: CA: A&M Records.Google Scholar
  58. Vaillancourt, T., & Sharma, A. (2011). Intolerance of sexy peers: intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 569–577. Scholar
  59. Van Vugt, M., & Tybur, J. M. (2015). The evolutionary foundations of hierarchy: status, dominance, prestige, and leadership. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  60. VanderLaan, D. P., & Vasey, P. L. (2008). Mate retention behavior of men and women in heterosexual and homosexual relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 572–585. Scholar
  61. von Rueden, C., Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2011). Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 278, 2223–2232. Scholar
  62. Wang, Y., & Griskevicius, V. (2013). Conspicuous consumption, relationships, and rivals: women’s luxury products as signals to other women. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 834–854. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyStephen F. Austin State UniversityNacogdochesUSA

Personalised recommendations