You Can’t Root for Both Teams!: Convergent Evidence for the Unidirectionality of Group Loyalty
Four studies tested the existence of a social norm that one cannot simultaneously support two competing groups or teams. Our evolved coalitional psychology should be sensitive to individuals expressing mixed loyalties between rivals, as they represent substantial threats for defection. Study 1 manipulated confederate attire and demonstrated that public displays of mixed loyalty provoked more attention and reactions than displays of consistent loyalty (n = 1327). Informants (n = 31) in the same population interviewed for study 2 agreed with the norm and cited the norm violation as the cause of reactions. Study 3 provided a more systematic and comprehensive assessment of affective and cognitive reactions to mixed and matching loyalty displays with an on-line survey of participants (n = 325) in the respective states of the rival universities. Study 4 examined naturalistic reactions (n = 318) to social media advertisements suggesting mixed loyalty to the two rival teams featured in the first three studies. These diverse methodologies provided convergent confirmatory evidence for the proposed social norm.
KeywordsTeams Intergroup perception Evolutionary psychology Loyalty Observational methods
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Alexander, R. D. (1979). Darwinism and human affairs. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
- Bieler, D. (2014). Watching kids play for both sides of Bears-Lions game? Fuller parents have the perfect jersey. The Washington Post. Retrieved from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2014/11/26/watching-kids-play-for-both-sides-of-bears-lions-game-fuller-parents-have-the-perfect-jersey/.
- Boehm, C. (1999). Hierarchy in the forest. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Bogardus, E. S. (1924). Fundamentals of social psychology. New York: Century.Google Scholar
- Campitelli, E. (2017). Mama Kelce created an Eagles-Chiefs’ mashup jersey to support both Jason and Travis. NBC Sports. Retrieved from: http://www.nbcsports.com/philadelphia/the700level/mama-kelce-created-eagles-chiefs-mashup-jersey-support-both-jason-and-travis.
- Crowther, N. B. (2007). Sport in ancient times. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1989). Human ethology. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Emmanuel, G. (2004). The 100-yard war: Inside the 100-year-old Michigan–Ohio State football rivalry. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Fahim, K. (2018). As Saudi Arabia relaxes its controls on culture and entertainment, artists dream—and worry. Washington Post. Retrieved from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/as-saudi-arabia-eases-controls-on-culture-and-entertainment-artists-dream%2D%2Dand-worry/2018/01/10/d480874c-e42c-11e7-a65d-1ac0fd7f097e_story.html.
- Goodall, J. (1990). Through a window: My thirty years with the chimpanzees of Gombe. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Gordon, J. (2017). Mathias Pogba and mum Yeo wear half-and-half shirts in support of brothers Paul and Florentin during Europa League clash. The Sun. Retrieved from: https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/2883834/mathias-pogba-and-mum-yeo-wear-half-and-half-shirts-in-support-of-brothers-paul-and-florentin-during-europa-league-clash/.
- Jackson, J. (1965). Structural characteristics of norms. In I. D. Steiner & M. Fishbein (Eds.), Current studies in social psychology (pp. 301–309). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
- Keeley, L. (1996). War before civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kruger, D. J., Wang, X. T., & Wilke, A. (2007). Towards the development of an evolutionarily valid domain-specific risk-taking scale. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 570–583.Google Scholar
- Reiss, M. (2015). The best story of Patriots-Titans week? No doubt, it’s ‘Mama McCourty.’ ESPN. Retrieved from: http://www.espn.com/blog/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4788816/the-best-story-of-patriots-titans-week-no-doubt-its-mama-mccourty.
- Richardson, B., & O’Dwyer, E. (2003). Football supporters and football team brands: A study in consumer brand loyalty. Irish Marketing Review, 16, 43–52.Google Scholar
- Scalise Sugiyama, M., Mendoza, M., & White, F. (2016). Assembling the CIA module: Coalitional play fighting in forager societies. Poster presented at the annual meetings of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
- Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Symons, D. (1978). Play and aggression: A study of rhesus monkeys. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
- Wetherell, M. (1982). Cross-cultural studies of minimal groups: implications for the social identity theory of intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 207–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Wilkerson, S. J. (1991). Then they were sacrificed: The ritual ballgame of northeastern Mesoamerica through time and space. In V. Scarborough & D. R. Wilcox (Eds.), The Mesoamerican Ballgame (pp. 129–144). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
- Wrangham, R., & Peterson, D. (1996). Demonic males: Apes and the origins of human violence. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
- Zillmann, D., Bryant, J., & Sapolsky, B. S. (1989). Enjoyment from sports spectatorship. In J. H. Goldstein (Ed.), Sports, games, and play: Social and psychological viewpoints (2nd ed., pp. 241–278). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar