Advertisement

Mate Value Discrepancy and Attachment Anxiety Predict the Perpetration of Digital Dating Abuse

  • Manpal Singh Bhogal
  • Jessica M. Howman
Research Article

Abstract

Research suggests that individual differences in attachment style predict the perpetration of digital dating abuse. In addition to attachment style, no research, to our knowledge, has explored the role of mate value in the perpetration of digital dating abuse. In this paper, we argue that digital dating abuse is a contemporary cost-inflicting mate retention behaviour, where larger mate value discrepancies between partners are associated with higher levels of digital dating abuse (n = 167). As expected, high mate value discrepancy and attachment anxiety were associated with high levels of digital dating abuse. We provide novel support for the relationship between mate value discrepancy and digital dating abuse. Our findings provide support for additional, unexplored factors which lead to the perpetration of digital dating abuse.

Keywords

Attachment style Mate value discrepancy Mate retention Digital dating abuse Romantic relationships 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank James E Bartlett, Robert Dempsey, Alison Owen and Maria Panagiotidi for their valuable comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arnocky, S., Sunderani, S., Gomes, W., & Vaillancourt, T. (2015). Anticipated partner infidelity and men’s intimate partner violence: the mediating role of anxiety. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 9(3), 186–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbaro, N., Pham, M. N., Shackelford, T. K., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2016). Insecure romantic attachment dimensions and frequency of mate retention behaviors. Personal Relationships, 23, 605–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbaro, N., Sela, Y., Atari, M., Shackleford, T. K., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (in press). Romantic attachment and mate retention behaviour. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships., 026540751774933.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517749330.
  4. Belknap, J., Chu, A. T., & Deprince, A. P. (2012). The roles of phones and computers in threatening and abusing women victims of male intimate partner abuse. Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy, 19(2), 373–406.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, D. C., Guran, E. L., Ramos, M. C., & Margolin, G. (2011). College students’ electronic victimization in friendships and dating relationships: anticipated distress and associations with risky behaviors. Violence and Victims, 26(4), 410–429.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brem, M. J., Spiller, L. C., & Vandehey, M. A. (2015). Online mate-retention tactics on Facebook are associated with relationship aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 2831–2850.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Buss, D. M. (1988). From vigilance to violence: tactics of mate retention in american undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9(5), 291–317.Google Scholar
  8. Buss, D. M., & Duntley, J. D. (2011). The evolution of intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(5), 411–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 346–361.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., & McKibbin, W. F. (2008). The Mate Retention Inventory-Short Form (MRI-SF). Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 322–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Boldry, J., & Kashy, D. A. (2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: the role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 510–531.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Conroy-Beam, D., Goetz, C. D., & Buss, D. M. (2016). What predicts romantic relationship satisfaction and mate retention intensity: mate preference fulfilment or mate value discrepancies? Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 440–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deans, H., & Bhogal, M. S. (in press). Perpetrating cyber dating abuse: the role of aggression, romantic jealousy and gender. Current Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9715-4.
  14. Drouin, M., & Landgraff, C. (2012). Texting, sexting, and attachment in college students’ romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 444–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dutton, D. G., & White, K. R. (2012). Attachment insecurity and intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 475–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elphinston, R. A., & Noller, P. (2011). Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(11), 631–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Erik, E., & Bhogal, M. S. (2016). Do the dark triad and self-perceived mate value predict intention to mate poach? Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science, 7(2), 1–4.Google Scholar
  18. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fox, J., & Anderegg, C. (2014). Romantic relationship stages and social networking sites: uncertainty reduction strategies and perceived relational norms on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(11), 685–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fox, J., & Warber, K. M. (2014). Social networking sites in romantic relationships: attachment, uncertainty, and partner surveillance on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(1), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fox, J., Osborn, J. L., & Warber, K. M. (2014). Relational dialectics and social networking sites: the role of Facebook in romantic relationship escalation, maintenance, conflict and dissolution. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 527–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Holden, C. J., Shackleford, T. K., Zeigler-Hill, V., Miner, E. J., Kaighobadi, F., Starratt, V. G., Jeffrey, A. J., & Buss, D. M. (2014). Husband’s esteem predicts his mate retention tactics. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(3), 655–672.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2017). Adult attachment and perceptions of closeness. Personal Relationships, 24(1), 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. JASP Team. (2018). JASP (Version 0.8.0.0) [Computer software].Google Scholar
  26. Kaighobadi, F., Shackleford, T. K., Popp, D., Moyer, R. M., Bates, V. M., & Liddle, J. R. (2009). Perceived risk of female infidelity moderates the relationship between men’s personality and partner-directed violence. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1033–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kirsner, B. R., Figueredo, A. J., & Jacobs, W. J. (2003). Self, friends, and lovers: structural relations among Beck Depression Inventory scores and perceived mate values. Journal of Affective Disorders, 75, 131–148.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lucero, J. L., Weisz, A. N., Smith-Darden, J., & Lucero, S. M. (2014). Exploring gender differences: socially interactive technology use/abuse among dating teens. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 29(4), 478–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Melander, L. (2010). College students' perceptions of intimate partner cyber harassment. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(3), 263–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miner, E. J., Starratt, V. G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2009). It’s not all about her: Men’s mate value and mate retention. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 214–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peter, J. P., Churchill, G. A., & Brown, T. J. (1993). Caution in the use of difference scores in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 655–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reed, L. A., Tolman, R. M., & Safyer, P. (2015). Too close for comfort: attachment insecurity and electronic intrusion in college students’ dating relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 431–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reed, L. A., Tolman, R. M., & Ward, L. M. (2016a). Snooping and sexting: digital media as a context for dating aggression and abuse among college students. Violence Against Women, 22(13), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reed, L. A., Tolman, R. M., Ward, L. M., & Safyer, P. (2016b). Keeping tabs: attachment anxiety and electronic intrusion in high school dating relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sánchez, V., Muñoz-Fernández, N., & Ortega-Ruíz, R. (2015). Cyberdating Q_A: an instrument to assess the quality of adolescent dating relationships in social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Seiffge-Krenke, I., & Burk, W. J. (2015). The dark side of romantic relationships: aggression in adolescent couples and links to attachment. Mental Health and Prevention, 3, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sela, Y., Mogilski, J. K., Shackelford, T. K., Zeigler-Hill, V., & Fink, B. (2016). Mate value discrepancy and mate retention behaviors of self and partner. Journal of Personality, 84(5), 560–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: a powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 543–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2014). Erratum to: polynomial regression with response surface analysis: a powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sidelinger, R. J., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2007). Mate value discrepancy as predictor of forgiveness and jealousy in romantic relationships. Communication Quarterly, 55(2), 207–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stackert, R. A., & Bursik, K. (2003). Why am I unsatisfied? Adult attachment style, gendered irrational relationship beliefs, and young adult romantic relationship satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1419–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Starratt, V. G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2012). He said, she said: men’s reports of mate value and mate retention behaviors in intimate relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 459–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Starratt, V. G., Weekes-Shackelford, V., & Shackelford, T. K. (2016). Mate value both positively and negatively predicts intentions to commit an infidelity. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stonard, K., Bowen, E., Lawrence, T., & Price, S. (2014). The relevance of technology to the nature, prevalence and impact of adolescent dating violence and abuse: a research synthesis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(4), 390–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sugarman, D. B., & Willoughby, T. (2013). Conceptual issues raised by the rapidly changing social environment. Psychology of Violence, 3(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Teten, A., Ball, B., Valle, L., Noonan, R., & Rosenbluth, B. (2009). Considerations for the definition, measurement, consequences, and prevention of dating violence victimization among adolescent girls. Journal of Women's Health, 18(7), 923–927.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Tokunaga, R. S. (2011). Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding the use of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 705–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Ouytsel, J., Van Gool, E., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., & Peeters, E. (2016). Exploring the role of social networking sites within adolescent romantic relationships and dating experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vorderer, P., & Kohring, M. (2013). Permanently online: a challenge for media and communication research. International Journal of Communication, 7, 188–196.Google Scholar
  50. Waters, E., Merrick, S., Treboux, D., Crowell, J., & Albershein, L. (2000). Attachment security in infancy and early adulthood: a twenty-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 71(3), 684–689.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Waynforth, D. (2001). Mate choice trade-offs and women’s preference for physically attractive men. Human Nature, 12(3), 207–219.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Wei, M., Russell, D. W., Mallinckrodt, B., & Vogel, D. L. (2007). Experiences in Close Relationships Scale (ECR)-short FORM: reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(2), 187–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wolford-Clevenger, C., Zapor, H., Brasfield, H., Febres, J., Elmquist, J., Brem, M., Shorey, R., & Stuart, G. (2016). An examination of the partner cyber abuse questionnaire in a college student sample. Psychology of Violence, 6(1), 156–162.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Zweig, J., Lachman, P., Yahner, J., & Dank, M. (2013). Correlates of cyber dating abuse among teens. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(8), 1306–1321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Staffordshire Centre for Psychological Research, Department of Psychology, School of Life Sciences and EducationStaffordshire UniversityStoke-on-TrentUK
  2. 2.School of Psychological, Social and Behavioural SciencesCoventry UniversityCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations