Skip to main content

What Caused over a Century of Decline in General Intelligence? Testing Predictions from the Genetic Selection and Neurotoxin Hypotheses

Abstract

Several converging lines of evidence indicate that general intelligence (g) has declined in Western populations. The causes of these declines are debated. Here, two hypotheses are tested: (1) selection acting against genetic variants that promote g causes the decline and (2) the presence of neurotoxic pollution in the environment causes the decline. A linear mixed model was devised to test (1) and (2), in which the secular decline in a “heritable g” (g.h) chronometric factor (comprised of convergent indicators of simple reaction time, working memory, utilization frequencies of high difficulty and also social-intelligence-indicating vocabulary items and per capita macro-innovation rates) was predicted using a neurotoxin chronometric factor (comprised of convergent secular trends among measures of lead, mercury and dioxin + furan pollution, in addition to alcohol consumption) and a polygenic score chronometric factor (comprised of polygenic score means for genetic variants predictive of g, sourced from US and Icelandic age-stratified cohorts). Bivariate correlations revealed that (other than time) only the polygenic score factor was significantly associated with declining g.h (r = .393, p < .05 vs. .033, ns for the neurotoxin factor). Using a hierarchical linear mixed model approach incorporating 25 year lags between the predictors and g.h, time period, operationalized categorically as fifths of a century, accounted for the majority of the variance in the decline in g.h (partial η2 = .584, p < .05). Net of time period and neurotoxins, changing levels of polygenic scores also significantly predicted variance in the decline in g.h (partial η2 = .253, p < .05); however, changing levels of neurotoxins did not significantly predict variance in g.h net of time (partial η2 = .027 ns). Within-period analysis indicates that the independent significant positive effect of the polygenic score factor on g.h was restricted to the third fifth of a century period (β = .202, p < .05).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. The term appears to have been coined in 2015 by Charles Murray. Sarraf (2017, p. 239), however, first defined Woodley effects as “secular trends that plausibly result, in part or in whole, from population-level degradation of the integrity of genetic factors that underlie g.”

  2. Demeneix’s (2014, 2017) somewhat confused qualitative inferences might result in part from an apparent lack of familiarity with the literature on secular trends in intelligence. In discussing the Flynn effect (Demeneix 2017, pp. 75–91), for example, she wrongly maintains that Woodley et al.’s (2013) finding of a decline in g is at odds with studies revealing Flynn effects. However, Woodley et al. (2013, 2014) made clear that the Flynn effect and dysgenesis on g can co-occur as they involve different phenotypic variance components of intelligence.

  3. Without distinguishing the two, giving the charge a pleonastic quality.

  4. This is perfectly consistent with environmental determinist stratagems used to trivialize or eliminate the role of genes in generating differences in intelligence (see Brand 1999).

  5. One example of these can be seen in her effort to explain IQ differences among individuals as a function of “modulat[ed] gene expression” related to “prenatal placental blood supply and nutrition” (Demeneix 2017, p. 87).

References

  • Bailey, D., Duncan, G. J., Odgers, C. L., & Yu, W. (2017). Persistence and fadeout in the impacts of child and adolescent interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10, 7–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, G. C., Batchelor, J. H., & McDaniel, M. A. (2010). Smarter people are (a bit) more symmetrical: a meta-analysis of the relationship between intelligence and fluctuating asymmetry. Intelligence, 38, 393–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T., Hansell, N. K., Martin, N. G., & Wright, M. J. (2016). When does socioeconomic status (SES) moderate the heritability of IQ?: no evidence for g x SES interaction for IQ in a representative sample 1,176 Australian adolescent twin pairs. Intelligence, 56, 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, J. P. (2016). Genetic evidence for natural selection in humans in the contemporary United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 113, 7774–7779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard Jr., T. J. (2004). Genetic influence on human psychological traits. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 148–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, C. (1999). IQ heritability—the emptiness of modern environmentalism. A review of: Robert J. Sternberg & Elena Grigorenko (eds.) (1997). Intelligence, Heredity and Environment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 767–774.

  • Brunswik, E. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology (international encyclopedia of unified science, volume 1, number 10). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunch, B., & Hellemans, A. (2004). The history of science and technology: a browser’s guide to the great discoveries, inventions, and the people who made them from the dawn of time to today. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderón-Garcidueñs, L., Mora-Tiscareño, A., Onitveros, E., Gómez-Garza, G., Barragán-Mejía, G., Broadway, J., … Engle, R.W. (2008). Air pollution, cognitive deficits and brain abnormalities: a pilot study with children and dogs. Brain and Cognition, 68, 117–127.

  • Cattell, R. B. (1950). The fate of national intelligence: test of a thirteen-year prediction. The Eugenics Review, 42, 136–148.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1937). The fight for our national intelligence. London, UK: P. S. King & Son, Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. P. (2015). Rising-falling mercury pollution causing the rising-falling IQ of the Lynn-Flynn effect, as predicted by the antiinnatia theory of autism and IQ. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, D., Laidley, T., Belsky, D. W., Fletcher, J. M., Boardman, J. D., & Domingue, B. W. (2016). Assortative mating and differential fertility by phenotype and genotype across the 20th century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113, 6647–6652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London, UK: D. Appleton & Co..

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Debes, F., Ludvig, A., Budtz-Jørgensen, E., Weihe, P., & Grandjean, P. (2015). The effects of methylmercury on general intelligence in children and young adults. Oral presentation given at the 16th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Intelligence Research. Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, September.

  • Debes, F., Weihe, P., & Grandjean, P. (2016). Cognitive deficit at age 22 years associated with prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Cortex, 74, 358–369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Demeneix, B. (2014). Losing our minds: how environmental pollution impairs human intelligence and mental health. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Demeneix, B. (2017). Toxic cocktail: how chemical pollution is poisoning our brains. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domingue, B., Belsky, D. W., Harrati, A., Conley, D., Weir, D., & Boardman, J. (2017). Mortality selection in a genetic sample and implications for association studies. International Journal of Epidemiology, 46, 1285–1294. (BioArxiv: https://doi.org/10.1101/049635).

  • Figlio, D. N., Freese, J., Karbownik, K., & Roth, J. (2017). Socioeconomic status and genetic influences on cognitive development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114, 13441–13446.

  • Flynn, J. R. (1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: what IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J. R., te Nijenhuis, J., & Metzen, D. (2014). The g beyond Spearman’s g: Flynn’s paradoxes resolved using four exploratory meta-analyses. Intelligence, 44, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. C., & Mitchum, A. L. (2013). A knowledge based theory of rising scores on “culture-free” tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 979–1000.

  • Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius. London, UK: MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillside, NJ: L. Earlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (2005). What if the hereditarian hypothesis is true? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 311–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagenmeier, H., & Walczok, M. (1996). Time trends in levels, patterns and profiles for PCDD/PCDF in sediment cores of Lake Constance. Organohalogen Compounds, 28, 101–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: intelligence and class structure in American life. New York, NY: Free Press Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, J. V., Reed, E. W., & Reed, S. C. (1962). Intelligence and family size: a paradox resolved. Eugenics Quarterly, 9, 84–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, J. (2005). A possible declining trend for worldwide innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72, 980–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: the science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kan, K. J., Wicherts, J. M., Dolan, C. V., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2013). On the nature and nurture of intelligence and specific cognitive abilities: the more heritable, the more culture dependent. Psychological Science, 24, 2420–2428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, A., Banks, E., Poplin, R., Garimella, K. V., Maguire, J. R., et al. (2017). Selection against variants in the genome associated with educational attainment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114, E727–E732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsificationism and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lievens, F., Reeve, C. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (2007). An examination of psychometric bias due to retesting in selection settings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1672–1682.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R. (1996). Dysgenics: genetic deterioration in modern populations. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R., & van Court, M. (2004). New evidence of dysgenic fertility for intelligence in the United States. Intelligence, 32, 193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madison, G., Woodley of Menie, M. A., & Sänger, J. (2016). Possible secular slowing auditory simple reaction time in Sweden (1959-1985). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 407.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, R. C., Bernardi, J. V. E., Cunha, M. P. L., & Dórea, J. G. (2016). Impact of organic mercury exposure and home delivery on neurodevelopment of Amazonian children. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 219, 498–502.

  • McKnight, P. E., McKnight, K. M., Sidani, S., & Figueredo, A. J. (2007). Missing data: a gentle introduction. New York, NY: Guildford Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzen, D. (2012). The causes of group differences in intelligence studied using the method of correlated vectors and psychometric meta-analysis. Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Amsterdam.

  • Millet, K., & Dewitte, S. (2007). Altruistic behaviour as a costly signal of general intelligence. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 316–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. (2003). Human accomplishment: the pursuit of excellence in the arts and sciences, 800 BC to 1950. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevin, R. (2000). How lead exposure relates to temporal changes in IQ, violent crime, and unwed pregnancy. Environmental Research Section A, 83, 1–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Okbay, A., Beauchamp, J.P., Fontana, M.A., Lee, J.J., Pers, T.H., Rietveld, C.A., et al. (2016). Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment. Nature, 533, 539–542.

  • Panizzon, M. S., Vuoksimaa, E., Spoon, K. M., Jacobson, K. C., Lyons, M. J., et al. (2014). Genetic and environmental influences on general cognitive ability: is g a valid latent construct? Intelligence, 43, 65–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pietschnig, J., & Gittler, G. (2015). A reversal of the Flynn effect for spatial perception in German speaking countries: Evidence from a crosstemporal IRT-based meta-analysis (1977–2014). Intelligence, 53, 145–153.

  • Pietschnig, J., & Voracek, M. (2015). One century of global IQ gains: a formal meta-analysis of the Flynn effect (1909–2013). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 282–306.

  • Pietschnig, J., & Gittler, G. (2017). Is ability-based emotional intelligence impervious to the Flynn effect? A cross-temporal meta-analysis (2001-2015). Intelligence, 61, 37-45.

  • Plomin, R. (2002). Quantitative trait loci and general cognitive ability. In J. Benjamin, R. P. Ebstein, & R. H. Belmaker (Eds.), Molecular genetics and human personality (pp. 211–230). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Portman Group (n.d.). Retrieved September 16, 2017, from http://www.portmangroup.org.uk/

  • Protzko, J. (2015). The environment in raising early intelligence: a meta-analysis of the fadeout effect. Intelligence, 53, 202–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, C. L., & Lam, H. (2007). The relation between practice effects, test-taker characteristics and degree of g-saturation. International Journal of Testing, 7, 225–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, J. P. (1998). The “Jensen effect” and the “Spearman–Jensen hypothesis” of black–white IQ differences. Intelligence, 26, 217–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, J. P. (1989). The generalizability of genetic estimates. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 985–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarraf, M. (2017). Review of historical variability in heritable general intelligence: its evolutionary origins and sociocultural consequences. Personality and Individual Differences, 109, 238–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, P. F., Krabbenhoft, D. P., Nafz, D. L., Cecil, L. D., Olson, M. L., Dewild, J. F., et al. (2002). Atmospheric mercury deposition during the last 270 years: a glacial ice core record of natural and anthropogenic sources. Environmental Science and Technology, 36, 2303–2310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sesardic, N. (2005). Making sense of heritability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, I. W. (2010). Simple reaction time: it is not what it used to be. American Journal of Psychology, 123, 39–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skirbekk, V. (2008). Fertility trends by social status. Demographic Research, 18, 145–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1904). General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundet, J. M., Tambs, K., Magnus, P., & Berg, K. (1988). On the question of secular trends in the heritability of intelligence test scores: a study of Norwegian twins. Intelligence, 12, 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • te Nijenhuis, J., & van der Flier, H. (2013). Is the Flynn effect on g?: a metaanalysis. Intelligence, 41, 802–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • te Nijenhuis, J., Jongeneel-Grimen, B., & Kirkegaard, E. O. W. (2014). Are Headstart gains on the g factor? A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 46, 209–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • te Nijenhuis, J., Jongeneel-Grimen, B., & Armstrong, E. L. (2015). Are adoption gains on the g factor? A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 73, 56–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • te Nijenhuis, J., van Vianen, A. E. M., & van der Flier, H. (2007). Sore gains on g-loaded tests: no g. Intelligence, 35, 283–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Tusscher, G.W., Leijs, M., Boer, L.D., Legler, J., Olie, K., Spekreijse, H., … Koppe, J. (2014). Neurodevelopmental retardation, as assessed clinically and with magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography, associated with perinatal dioxin exposure. Science of the Total Environment, 491-492, 235–239.

  • Tucker-Drob, E. M., & Bates, T. C. (2016). Large cross-national differences in gene x socioeconomic status interaction on intelligence. Psychological Science, 27, 138–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • VinePair. (n.d.). Retreived September 15, 2017, from https://www.vinepair.com.

  • Voronin, I., te Nijenhuis, J., & Malykh, S. B. (2015). The correlation between g loadings and heritability in Russia. Journal of Biosocial Science, 28, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicherts, J. M., Dolan, C. V., Oosterveld, P., Hessen, D. J., van Baal, G. C. M., Boomsma, D. I., et al. (2004). Are intelligence tests measurement invariant over time? Investigating the nature of the Flynn effect. Intelligence, 32, 509–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wongupparaj, P., Wongupparaj, R., Kumari, & Morris, R. G. (2017). The Flynn effect for verbal and visuospatial short-term and working memory: a cross-temporal meta-analysis. Intelligence, 64, 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodley, M. A. (2012). The social and scientific temporal correlates of genotypic intelligence and the Flynn effect. Intelligence, 40, 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodley, M. A., & Figueredo, A. J. (2013). Historical variability in heritable general intelligence: its evolutionary origins and socio-cultural consequences. Buckingham, UK: Buckingham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodley, M. A., & Madison, G. (2013). Establishing an association between the Flynn effect and ability differentiation. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 387–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodley, M. A., te Nijenhuis, J., & Murphy, R. (2013). Were the Victorians cleverer than us? The decline in general intelligence estimated from a meta-analysis of the slowing of simple reaction time. Intelligence, 41, 843–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodley, M. A., te Nijenhuis, J., & Murphy, R. (2014). Is there a dysgenic secular trend towards slowing simple reaction time? Responding to a quartet of critical commentaries. Intelligence, 46, 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodley of Menie, M. A. (2016). Consideration of cognitive variance components potentially solves Beauchamp’s paradox. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113, E5780–E5781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodley of Menie, M. A., & Fernandes, H. B. F. (2015). Do opposing secular trends on backwards and forwards digit span evidence the co-occurrence model? A comment on Gignac (2015). Intelligence, 50, 125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodley of Menie, M. A., & Fernandes, H. B. F. (2016a). Showing their true colours: possible secular declines and a Jensen effect on color acuity—more evidence for the weaker variant of Spearman’s other hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 280–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodley of Menie, M. A., & Fernandes, H. B. F. (2016b). The secular decline in general intelligence from decreasing developmental stability: theoretical and empirical considerations. Personality and Individual Differences, 92, 194–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodley of Menie, M. A., Fernandes, H. B. F., Figueredo, A. J., & Meisenberg, G. (2015a). By their words ye shall know them: evidence of genetic selection against general intelligence and concurrent environmental enrichment in vocabulary usage since the mid 19th century. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodley of Menie, M. A., Figueredo, A. J., Sarraf, M. A., Hertler, S., Fernandes, H. B. F., & Peñaherrera Aguirre, M. (2017a). The rhythm of the west: a biohistory of the modern era, AD 1600 to the present. Journal of Social Political and Economic Studies, monograph series, no. 37. Washington, DC: Scott Townsend Press.

  • Woodley of Menie, M. A., Peñaherrera-Aguirre, M., Fernandes, H. B. F., & Figueredo, A. J. (2017b). What causes the anti-Flynn effect? A data synthesis and analysis of predictors. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000106.

  • Woodley of Menie, M. A., Schwartz, J. A., & Beaver, K. M. (2016). How cognitive genetic factors influence fertility outcomes: a meditational SEM analysis. Twins Research and Human Genetics, 19, 628–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodley of Menie, M. A., te Nijenhuis, J., & Murphy, R. (2015b). The Victorians were still faster than us. Commentary: Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction times. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 452.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Woodley of Menie, M.A., te Nijenhuis, J.,Shibaev, V., Li,M., & Smit, J. (2018). Are the effects of lead exposure linked to the g factor? A meta-analysis. Working Paper.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael A. Woodley of Menie.

Additional information

Matthew A. Sarraf and Mateo Peñaherrera-Aguirre: Joint second authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Woodley of Menie, M.A., Sarraf, M.A., Peñaherrera-Aguirre, M. et al. What Caused over a Century of Decline in General Intelligence? Testing Predictions from the Genetic Selection and Neurotoxin Hypotheses. Evolutionary Psychological Science 4, 272–284 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-017-0131-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-017-0131-7

Keywords

  • Directional selection
  • Dysgenics
  • General intelligence
  • Neurotoxins
  • Polygenic scores