Advertisement

Evolutionary Psychological Science

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 191–201 | Cite as

Are Women Sexually Fluid? The Nature of Female Same-Sex Attraction and Its Evolutionary Origins

  • Menelaos Apostolou
Theoretical Article

Abstract

The notion that female sexuality is fluid, meaning that women can experience attractions for either men or women depending on the circumstances, has been widely accepted by the academic community. Accordingly, scholars have attempted to develop evolutionary models that could explain why selection forces have favored sexual fluidity in women. The present paper reviews longitudinal studies on sexual attraction which indicate that the great majority of women do not have a fluid sexuality, but have instead stable attractions over time. Moreover, the current paper reviews studies on arousal, in order to demonstrate that they indicate a weak correlation between sexual arousal and sexual attraction in women, and not that women are attracted to both sexes. The evolutionary implications of the findings on female sexuality are further explored.

Keywords

Sexual fluidity Same-sex attraction Homosexuality Sexual arousal 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Apostolou, M. (2013). The evolution of rape: the fitness benefits and costs of a forced-sex mating strategy in an evolutionary context. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 484–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apostolou, M. (2016). The evolution of female same-sex attractions: the weak selection pressures hypothesis. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 10, 270–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apostolou, M. (2017). Why sexual plasticity in women is unlikely to be an adaptation to reduce conflict in polygynous marriages. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 329–330.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Apostolou, M., Shialos, M., Khalil, M., & Paschali, M. (2017). The evolution of female same-sex attraction: the male choice hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 372–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bailey, J. M., & Zucker, K. J. (1995). Childhood sex-typed behavior and sexual orientation: a conceptual analysis and quantitative review. Developmental Psychology, 31, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bailey, J. M., Vasey, P. L., Diamond, L. M., Breedlove, S. M., Vilain, E., & Epprecht, M. (2016). Sexual orientation, controversy, and science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17, 45–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: the female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 347–374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell, A. P., Weinberg, M. S., & Hammersmith, S. K. (1981). Sexual preference: its development in men and women. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bossio, J. A., Suschinsky, K. D., Puts, D. A., & Chivers, M. L. (2014). Does menstrual cycle phase influence the gender specificity of heterosexual women’s genital and subjective sexual arousal? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 941–952.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Boswell, J. (1980). Christianity, social tolerance and homosexuality: gay people in Western Europe from the beginning of the Christian era to the fourteenth century. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bouchard, K. N., Chivers, M. L., & Pukal, C. F. (2017). Effects of genital response measurement device and stimulus characteristics on sexual concordance in women. The Journal of Sex Research. Advance Online Publication.Google Scholar
  12. Bradley, M. M., Miccoli, L., Escrig, M. A., & Lang, P. J. (2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology, 45, 602–607.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Calzo, J. P., Masyn, K. E., Austin, S. B., Jun, H. J., & Corliss, H. L. (2017). Developmental latent patterns of identification as mostly heterosexual vs. lesbian, gay or bisexual. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27, 246–253.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chivers, M. L. (2017). The specificity of women’s sexual response and its relationship with sexual orientations: a review and ten hypotheses. Archives of Sexual Behavior. Advance Online Publication.Google Scholar
  15. Chivers, M. L., Rieger, G., Latty, E. M., & Bailey, J. M. (2004). A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal. Psychological Science, 15, 736–744.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., & Blanchard, R. (2007). Gender and sexual orientation differences in sexual response to sexual activities versus gender of actors in sexual films. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1108–1121.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Chivers, M. L., Roy, C., Grimbos, T., Cantor, J. M., & Seto, M. C. (2014). Specificity of sexual arousal for sexual activities in men and women with conventional and masochistic sexual interests. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 931–940.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Costa Jr., P., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. D’Augelli, A. R., & Patterson, C. J. (1995). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities over the lifespan: psychological perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dawson, S. J., Sawatsky, M. L., & Lalumière, M. L. (2015). Assessment of introital lubrication. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1527–1535.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Diamond, L. M. (2008a). Female bisexuality from adolescence to adulthood: results from a 10-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 44, 5–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Diamond, L. M. (2008b). Sexual fluidity: Understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Diamond, L. M. (2016). Sexual fluidity in male and females. Current Sexual Health Reports, 8, 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Diamond, L. M., Dickenson, J. A., & Blair, K. L. (2017). Stability of sexual attractions across different timescales: the roles of bisexuality and gender. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 193–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dickson, N., Paul, C., & Herbison, P. (2003). Same-sex attraction in a birth cohort: prevalence and persistence in early adulthood. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 1607–1615.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Dickson, N., van Roode, T., Cameron, C., & Paul, C. (2013). Stability and change in same-sex attraction, experience, and identity by sex and age in a New Zealand birth cohort. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 753–763.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. ten Donkelaar, H. J., Němcová, V., Lammens, M., Overeem, S., & Keyser, A. (2011). The Autonomic Nervous System. Clinical Neuroanatomy. Google Scholar
  28. Ebsworth, M., & Lalumière, M. L. (2012). Viewing time as a measure of bisexual sexual interest. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 161–172.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ellis, L., & Ames, M. A. (1987). Neurohormonal functioning and sexual orientation: a theory of homosexuality-heterosexuality. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 233–258.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Field, A. E., Camargo, C. A., Taylor, C. B., Berkey, C. S., Frazier, L., Gillman, M. W., et al. (1999). Overweight, weight concerns, and bulimic behaviors among girls and boys. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38, 754–760.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Fone, B. (2000). Homophobia: A history. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  32. Gavrilets, S., & Rice, W. R. (2006). Genetic models of homosexuality: Generating testable predictions. Proceeding of the Royal Society B, 273, 3031–3038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haldeman, D. C. (1991). Sexual conversion therapy for gay men and lesbians: a scientific examination. In J. C. Gonsiorek & J. D. Weinrich (Eds.), Homosexuality: Research implications for public policy (pp. 149–160). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Haldeman, D. C. (1994). The practice and ethics of sexual orientation conversion therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 221–227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Huberman, J. S., & Chivers, M. L. (2015). Examining gender specificity of sexual response with concurrent thermography and plethysmography. Psychophysiology, 52, 1382–1395.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Institute of Medicine. (2011). The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: building a foundation for better understanding. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kanazawa, S. (2017). Possible evolutionary origins of human female sexual fluidity. Biological Reviews, 92, 1251–1274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kinnish, K. K., Strassberg, D. S., & Turner, C. W. (2005). Sex differences in the flexibility of sexual orientation: a multidimensional retrospective assessment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 173–183.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W., Martin, C., & Gebhard, P. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  40. Kuhle, B. X., & Radtke, S. (2013). Born both ways: the alloparenting hypothesis for sexual fluidity in women. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 304–323.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lang, P. J., & Bradley, M. M. (2010). Emotion and the motivational brain. Biological Psychology, 84, 437–450.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. LeVay, S. (2010). Gay, straight, and the reason why: the science of sexual orientation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lippa, R. A. (2012). Effects of sex and sexual orientation on self-reported attraction and viewing times to images of men and women: testing for category specificity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 149–160.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lippa, R. A. (2013). Men and women with bisexual identities show bisexual patterns of sexual attraction to male and female “swimsuit models”. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 187–196.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lynn, R., & Martin, T. (1997). Gender differences in extraversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism in 37 nations. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 369–373.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Mock, S. E., & Eibach, R. P. (2012). Stability and change in sexual orientation identity over a 10-year period in adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 641–648.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Money, J. (1987). Sin, sickness, or status? Homosexual gender identity and psychoneuroendrocrinology. American Psychologist, 43, 384–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ott, M. Q., Corliss, H. L., Wypij, D., Rosario, M., & Austin, S. B. (2011). Stability and change in self-reported sexual orientation identity in young people: application of mobility metrics. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 519–532.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Osborne, S. Women are never straight—they are either gay or bisexual, study suggests. (2015, November, 5). Retrieved from: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/women-are-never-straight-they-are-either-gay-or-bisexual-study-suggests-a6723276.html.
  50. Pattatucci, A. M. L., & Hamer, D. H. (1995). Development and familiality of sexual orientation in females. Behavior Genetics, 25, 407–420.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Rieger, G., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2012). The eyes have it: sex and sexual orientation differences in pupil dilation patterns. PLoS One, 7, e40256.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Rieger, G., Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2005). Sexual arousal patterns of bisexual men. Psychological Science, 16, 579–584.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Rieger, G., Cash, B. M., Merrill, S. M., Jones-Rounds, J., Dharmavaram, S. M., & Savin Williams, R. C. (2015). Sexual arousal: the correspondence of eyes and genitals. Biological Psychology, 104, 56–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Osborne, S. (2015) Women are never straight—they are either gay or bisexual, study suggests. Retrieved from: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/women-are-never-straight-they-are-either-gay-or-bisexual-study-suggests-a6723276.html.
  55. Rieger, G., Savin-Williams, R. C., Chivers, M. L. & Bailey, M. J. (2016). Sexual arousal and masculinity-femininity of women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance Online Publication.Google Scholar
  56. Rosario, M., Schrimshaw, E. W., Hunter, J., & Braun, L. (2006). Sexual identity development among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths: consistency and change over time. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 46–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Savin-Williams, R. C., Joyner, K., & Rieger, G. (2012). Prevalence and stability of self-reported sexual orientation identity during young adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 103–110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Slaughter, L., Brown, C. R. V., Crowley, S., & Peck, R. (1997). Patterns of genital injury in female sexual assault victims. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 176, 609–616.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Thornhill, R., & Thornhill, N. W. (1983). Human rape: an evolutionary analysis. Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 137–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weinberg, M. S., Williams, C. J., & Pryor, D. W. (1994). Dual attraction: understanding bisexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Wright Jr., L., & Adams, H. (1994). Assessment of sexual preference using a choice reaction time task. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 16, 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wright Jr., L. W., & Adams, H. E. (1999). The effects of stimuli that vary in erotic content on cognitive processes. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social SciencesUniversity of NicosiaNicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations