The “Kinship Penalty”: Parenthood and In-Law Conflict in Contemporary Finland
- 78 Downloads
Intergenerational relations between affinal kin create both support and tensions to family members. Previous studies indicate that relations with affines may change once a grandchild is involved, yet this has not been explored with respect to conflicts. We use survey data of contemporary Finns (n = 1202) to investigate how parenthood is associated with the likelihood of reporting conflicts with one’s own parents and parents-in-law. Based on inclusive fitness theory, we hypothesise that affinal kin will be treated more like biological kin if a couple has children as compared to childless couples. Results show that overall, Finns reported higher conflict occurrence with their own parents than with their in-laws. Compared to childless couples, parents were as likely to report conflicts with their own parents, but more likely to report conflicts with their parents-in-law. Results were robust after taking into account several sociodemographic factors as well as the contact frequencies and emotional closeness between the parties concerned. Daughters-in-law were more likely to report conflicts when paternal grandmothers provided more grandchild care, indicating that the conflict measure used here is indeed related to investment in offspring. We conclude that shared relatedness to a grandchild renders affines “more like kin” with regards to conflicts, indicating the existence of a “kinship penalty” in family relation in addition to the previously reported “kinship premium”.
KeywordsAffinal kin Conflicts Cross-generational relations Grandchild care Grandparents In-laws Mother-in-law Parenthood
The data collection was funded by the Academy of Finland (Grant nr. 250620).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Anttonen, A. (1999). Child home care allowances: an innovation in Finnish family policy. Studies in social security and health no. 52. Helsinki, Finland: The Social Insurance Institution.Google Scholar
- Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Danielsbacka, M., Tanskanen, A. O., Hämäläinen, H., Pelkonen, I., Haavio-Mannila, E., Rotkirch, A., Karisto, A., & Roos, J. P. (2013). Sukupolvien vuorovaikutus. Auttaminen ja yhteydenpito suurten ikäluokkien ja heidän lastensa elämässä. In Inter-generational relations: helping and interaction in the life of Finnish baby boomers and their adult children. Helsinki: Finnish Family Federation.Google Scholar
- Euler, H. A. (2011). Grandparents and extended kin. In C. A. Salmon & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary family psychology (pp. 181–210). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Fowler, C., & Rittenour, C. (2017). A life-span approach to children-in-law’s perceptions of parent-in-law communication. Journal of Family Communication. doi: 10.1080/15267431.2017.1281280.
- Hagestad, G. O. (2006). Transfers between grandparents and grandchildren: the importance of taking a three-generation perspective. Zeitschrift Familienforschung, 18, 315–332.Google Scholar
- Hogerbrugge, M. J. A., & Komter, A. E. (2012). Solidarity and ambivalence: comparing two perspectives on intergenerational relations using longitudinal panel data. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67, 372–383. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother nature. A history of mothers, infants, and natural selection. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
- Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Mothers and others. The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Hughes, A. L. (1988). Evolution and human kinship. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kangas, O., & Kvist, J. (2013). Nordic welfare states. In B. Greve (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of the welfare state (pp. 148–160). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Official Statistics of Finland (OSF) (2012). Families [e-publication].ISSN=1798–3231. Annual Review 2011. Helsinki: Statistics Finland [referred: 9.7.2015].Access method: http://www.stat.fi/til/perh/2011/02/perh_2011_02_2012-11-09_tie_001_en.html
- Official Statistics of Finland (OSF). (2017). Educational structure of population. Helsinki: Statistics Finland [e-publication]. ISSN=2242-2919 [referred: 12.5.2017].Google Scholar
- Rossi, A. S., & Rossi, P. H. (1990). Of human bonding: parent-child relations across the life course. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
- Rotkirch, A. (forthcoming). Evolutionary family sociology. In R. Hopcroft (Ed.), Oxford handbook of evolution, biology and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Salmon, C., & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.). (2011). The Oxford handbook of evolutionary family psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Szydlik, M. (2016). Sharing lives: adult children and parents. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Tanskanen, A. O., Danielsbacka, M., Jokela, M., David-Barret, T., & Rotkirch, A. (2016a). Diluted competition? Conflicts between full and half siblings in two adult generations. Frontiers in Sociology, 1. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2016.00006.
- Tanskanen, A. O., Danielsbacka, M., Jokela, M., & Rotkirch, A. (2016b). Sibling conflicts in full- and half-sibling households in the UK. Journal of Biosocial Science, 48. doi: 10.1017/S0021932016000043.
- Voland, E., & Beise, J. (2005). “The husband’s mother is the devil in house” data on the impact of the mother-in-law on stillbirth mortality in Historical Krummhörn (1750–1874) and some thoughts on the evolution of postgenerative female life. In E. Voland, A. Chasiotis, & W. Schiefenhövel (Eds.), Grandmotherhood: the evolutionary significance of the second half of female life (pp. 239–255). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar