Not Straight and Not Straightforward: the Relationships Between Sexual Orientation, Sociosexuality, and Dark Triad Traits in Women
Two studies examined the connection between women’s sexual orientation, their sociosexuality (i.e. willingness, attitudes, and desires associated with uncommitted sexual behaviour), and Dark Triad traits (Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy). Both studies found that moderately bisexual women reported less-restricted sociosexuality, as well as higher levels of Dark Triad traits––particularly psychopathy. In both studies, sexual orientation differences in Dark Triad traits were mediated by sociosexuality. Study 2 confirmed that the relationship between women’s sexual orientation and sociosexuality is curvilinear, with moderately bisexual women (i.e. Kinsey 1–2) reporting heightened sociosexuality compared to other groups. These results are consistent with the conclusion that moderate levels of female bisexuality may be a by-product of selection for traits that result in less restricted sociosexuality. At either end of the orientation continuum, women who report exclusive or near-exclusive homosexuality or heterosexuality report more restricted sociosexuality and lower Dark Triad scores, compared to women nearer to the middle of the continuum. As such, the aetiology of moderate bisexuality in women may be distinct from the aetiology of exclusive or near-exclusive homosexuality in women.
KeywordsFemale sexual orientation Sociosexuality Dark triad Bisexuality Female gynephilia
Scott W. Semenyna and Charlene F. Belu are funded by Joseph-Armand Bombardier Canada Graduate Scholarships (Doctoral) from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All research was conducted with institutional ethical approval consistent with the Canadian Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS 2) and the Declaration of Helsinki.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. An institutional human subject research ethics committee reviewed and approved this research.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Apostolou, M. (2016a). Why sexual plasticity in women is unlikely to be an adaptation to reduce conflict in polygynous marriages. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0866-4.
- Apostolou, M. (2016b). The evolution of female same-sex attractions: the weak selection pressure hypothesis. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. doi: 10.1037/ebs0000072.
- Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 537–545.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bailey J. M., Vasey P. L., Diamond L. D., Breedlove S. M., Vilain E., Epprecht M. (2016). Sexual orientation, controversy, and science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17. doi: 10.1177/1529100616637616.
- Bogaert, A. F., Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2017). Personality and sexual orientation: extension to asexuality and the HEXACO model. Journal of Sex Research. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2017.1287844.
- Buss, D. M. (2006). Strategies of human mating. Psychological Topics, 2, 239–260.Google Scholar
- Cherkas, L. F., Oelsner, E. C., Mak, Y. T., Valdes, A., & Spektor, T. D. (2004). Genetic influences on female infidelity and number of sexual partners in humans: a linkage and association study of the role of the vasopressin receptor gene (AVPR1A). Twin Research, 7, 649–658.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Dawson, S. J., Fretz, K. M., & Chivers, M. L. (2016). Visual attention patterns of women with androphilic and gynephilic sexual attractions. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0825-0.
- Diamond, L. M. (2009). Sexual fluidity: understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Diamond, L. M. (2013). Concepts of female sexual orientation. In C. J. Patterson & A. R. D’Auguelli (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and sexual orientation (pp. 3–17). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IMB SPSS statistics. London: SAGE Publishing.Google Scholar
- Frick, A., Bachtiger, M. T., & Reips, U.-D. (2001). Financial incentives, personal information and drop-out in online studies. In U.-D. Reips & M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Dimensions of internet science (pp. 209–219). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.Google Scholar
- Gates, G. J. (2011). How many people are lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender? Los Angeles: UCLA, Williams Institute.Google Scholar
- Greaves, L. M., Barlow, F. K., Huang, Y., Stronge, S., & Sibley, C. G. (2017). Personality across sexual identity and gender in a national probability sample in New Zealand. Sex Roles. doi: 10.1007/s11199-017-0752-0.
- Haupert, L., Gesselman, A. N., Moors, A. C., Fisher, H. E., & Garcia, J. R. (2016). Prevalence of experiences with consensual nonmonogamous relationships: findings from two national samples of single Americans. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2016.1178675.
- Honey, P. L. (2017). The element of surprise: women of the Dark Triad. In M. Fisher (Ed.), Handbook of women and competition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Howard, R. M., & Perilloux, C. (2016). Is mating psychology most closely tied to biological sex or preferred partner’s sex? Personality and Individual Differences. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.009.
- Jackson, S. L. (2011). Research methods and statistics: a critical thinking approach. Belmont: Cengage.Google Scholar
- Joinson, A. N. (2007). Disinhibition and the internet. In J. Gackenback (Ed.), Psychology and the internet: intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications (pp. 76–90). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Kanazawa, S. (2016). Possible evolutionary origins of human female sexual fluidity. Bioligical Reviews. doi: 10.1111/brv.12278.
- Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
- Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- LeVay, S. (2016). Gay, straight, and the reason why: the science of sexual orientation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lindley, L. L., Walsemann, K. M., & Carter, J. W. (2012). The association of sexual orientation measures with young adults’ health-related outcomes. Research and Practice, 102, 1177–1185.Google Scholar
- Mosher, D. L., Chandra, A., & Jones, J. M. (2005). Sexual behavior and selected health measures: men and women 14–44 years of age, United States, 2002. (www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ad/ad362.pdf).
- Schmitt, D. P. (2007). Sexual strategies across sexual orientations. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 18, 183–214.Google Scholar
- Schmitt, D. P., Long, A. E., McPhearson, A., O’Brien, K., Remmert, B., & Shah, S. H. (2016). Personality and gender differences in global perspective. International Journal of Psychology. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12265.
- Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar