Abstract
Four studies tested the hypotheses that (1) romantic partners function as hard-to-fake signals of status and (2) men are concerned about signaling their status to both other men and to other women. In study 1, participants rated the status of an individual (gender remained neutral) who was described as attending a party with either a high-quality good (watch, car, mate) or a low-quality good. Participants rated the high-quality signaler as possessing more status than the low-quality signaler. Importantly, the high-quality mates functioned similarly to other high-quality material goods. In study 2, participants rated the status, niceness, and competence of men with high-quality mates and similarly described me with low-quality mates. Participants consistently rated the men with high-quality mates as possessing more status than similarly described men with low-quality mates. In study 3, we had only men rate that status of men with high-quality, average-quality, and low-quality mates. Men consistently rated other men with high-quality mates as possessing more status than similarly described men with low-quality mates. Finally, in study 4, we tested whether men signal high-quality mates predominantly to other men or to other women. Results supported the hypothesis that men are more concerned about signaling the quality of their mate to other men than to other women. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of these findings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500.
Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 295–298.
Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Sexual economics: sex as females resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339–363.
Bird, R. B., & Smith, E. A. (2005). Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Current Anthropology, 46, 222–248.
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 134–146.
Carlsson, F., Johansson-Stenman, O., & Martinsson, P. (2007). Do you enjoy having more than others? Survey evidence of positional goods. Economica, 74, 586–598.
Cronk, L. (2005). The application of animal signaling theory to human phenomena: some thoughts and clarifications. Social Science Information, 44, 603–620.
Dunn, M. J., & Searle, R. (2010). Effect of manipulated prestige-car ownership on both sex attractiveness ratings. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 69–80.
Eva, K. W., & Wood, T. J. (2006). Are all the taken men good? An indirect examination of mate-choice copying in humans. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 175, 1573–1574.
Frank, R. H. (1985). The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods. The American Economic Review, 75, 101–116.
Getty, T. (2006). Sexually selected signals are not similar to sports handicaps. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 83–88.
Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Why g matters: the complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 79–132.
Griskevicius, V., & Kenrick, D. T. (2013). Fundamental motives: How evolutionary needs influence consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, 372–386.
Hill, S. E., & Buss, D. M. (2008). The mere presence of opposite-sex others on judgments of sexual and romantic desirability: opposite effects for men and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 635–647.
Jiang, Y., Bolnick, D. I., & Kirkpatrick, M. (2013). Assortative mating in animals. The American Naturalist, 181, E125–E138.
Krebs, J., & Davies, N. (1987). An introduction to behavioral ecology (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Lynn, R., & Mikk, J. (2007). National differences in intelligence and educational attainment. Intelligence, 35, 115–121.
Maynard Smith, J., & Harper, D. (2003). Animal signals. New York: Oxford University Press.
Miller, G. F. (2010). Spent: sex, evolution, and consumer behavior. New York: Penguin.
Nelissen, R. M., & Meijers, M. H. C. (2011). Social benefits of luxury brands as costly signals of wealth and status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 343–355.
Plourde, A. M. (2008). The origins of prestige goods as honest signals of skill and knowledge. Human Nature, 19, 374–388.
Pruett-Jones, S. (1992). Independent versus nonindependent mate choice: do females copy each other? The American Naturalist, 140, 1000–1009.
Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 157–175.
Puts, D. (2016). Human sexual selection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 28–32.
Regan, P. C., & Dreyer, C. S. (1999). Lust? Love? Status? Young adults’ motives for engaging in casual sex. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 11, 1–24.
Rodeheffer, C. D., Leyva, R. P. P., & Hill, S. E. (2016). Attractive female romantic partners provide a proxy for unobservable male qualities: the when and why behind human female mate choice copying. Evolutionary Psychology, 14, 1474704916652144.
Russell, R. J., Wells, P. A., & Rushton, J. P. (1985). Evidence for genetic similarity detection in human marriage. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 183–187.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 162–173.
Searcy, W. A., & Nowicki, S. (2010). The evolution of animal communication: reliability and deception in signaling systems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sigall, H., & Landy, D. (1973). Radiating beauty: effects of having a physically attractive partners on perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 218–224.
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355–374.
Strane, K., & Watts, C. (1977). Females judged by attractiveness of partner. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45, 225–226.
Sundie, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Vohs, K. D., & Beal, D. J. (2011). Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 664–680.
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford: New York.
United States Census Bureau. (2010). Median and average square feet of floor area in new single-family houses completed by location [data file]. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/const/C25Ann/sfotalmedavgsqft.pdf.
Vakirtzis, A., & Roberts, S. C. (2009). Mate choice copying and mate quality bias: different processes, different species. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 908–911.
Vakirtzis, A., & Roberts, S. C. (2010). Nonindependent mate choice in monogamy. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 898–901.
Veblen, T. (1994). The theory of the leisure class. New York: Dover.
Waynforth, D. (2007). Mate choice copying in humans. Human Nature, 18, 264–271.
von Rueden, C., Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2010). Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 278, 2223–2232.
Winegard, B. (2014). Mate flaunting. Unpublished manuscript.
Winegard, B., Winegard, B., & Geary, D. C. (2013). If you’ve got it, flaunt it: humans flaunt attractive opposite-sex partner for status and desirability. PloS One, 8, e72000. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072000.
Winston, J. S., O’Doherty, J., Kilner, J. M., Perrett, D. I., & Dolan, R. J. (2007). Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia, 45, 195–206.
Young, J. H., Nunes, J. C., & Dréze, X. (2010). Signaling status with luxury goods: the role of brand prominence. Journal of Marketing, 74, 15–30.
Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1997). The handicap principle: a missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Winegard, B., Winegard, B., Reynolds, T. et al. One’s Better Half: Romantic Partners Function as Social Signals. Evolutionary Psychological Science 3, 294–305 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-017-0095-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-017-0095-7