Advertisement

European Business Organization Law Review

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 701–731 | Cite as

Enforcing EU Company Law: Requirements and Limitations in Implementing Penalties for Infringements of EU Company Law

  • Karsten Engsig Sørensen
Article
  • 262 Downloads

Abstract

One thing is to harmonise EU company law, another thing is to ensure that the harmonised law is enforced properly. There are indications that there may be enforcement problems in this area. Such problems can be mitigated or even eliminated if EU law sets clear standards for how enforcement should be conducted. Against this backdrop, this article examines what EU law requires from the Member States when enforcing EU company law. Even though the harmonisation of EU company law seldom addresses the question of how the rules should be enforced, EU law in different ways sets bounds to how the enforcement should be conducted. These bounds are set by the requirement for effective enforcement of EU law formulated by the CJEU by free movement rights, fundamental rights and other general principles of EU law. There are so many cases dealing with this issue that it is possible to outline these bounds mainly by analysing cases dealing with company law issues. As a consequence of these bounds, the Member States may have some discretion in deciding the penalties, but they are far from free to do so. If there are major differences in how Member States enforce EU company law, this may cause major problems for the functioning of the internal market. For this reason there is a need to keep a close eye on the enforcement of EU company law in the Member State and, if necessary, harmonise aspects of the enforcement.

Keywords

Penalties Sanctions EU Company Law Proportional Free movement Jurisdiction Fundamental rights 

References

  1. Arnull A (2011) What is a general principle of EU law? In: De la Feria R, Vogenauer S (eds) Prohibition of abuse of law: a new general principle of EU law?. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 7–32Google Scholar
  2. Barnard C (2008) Unravelling the service directive. Common Mark Law Rev 45:323–394Google Scholar
  3. Barnard C (2009) Restricting restrictions: lessons for the EU from the US? Camb Law J 68:575–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barzuza M (2012) Market segmentation: the rise of Nevada as a liability-free jurisdiction. Va Law Rev 98:935–1000Google Scholar
  5. Bronckers M, Vallery Z (2011) No longer presumed guilty? The impact of fundamental rights on certain dogmas of EC competition law. World Compet 34:535–570Google Scholar
  6. Clausen NJ, Sørensen KE (1999) The regulation of takeover bids in Europe: the impact of the proposed 13th EC Company Law Directive on the present regulation in the EU Member States. Int Comp Law J 1:169–218Google Scholar
  7. Curtin D, Mortelmans K (1994) Application and enforcement of Community Law by the Member States: actors in search of a Third Generation script. In: Curtin D, Heukels T (eds) Institutional dynamics of European integration, vol II. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 423–466Google Scholar
  8. Dashwood A, Dougan M, Rodger B, Spaventa E, Wyatt D (2011) Wyatt and Dashwood’s European Union law. Hart, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies PL, Hopt KJ (2013) Corporate boards in Europe—accountability and convergence. Am J Comp Law 61:301–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De la Feria R, Vogenauer S (eds) (2011) Prohibition of abuse of law: a new general principle of EU law?. Hart Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Dougan M (2012) From the velvet glove to the iron fist: criminal sanctions for the enforcement of Union law. In: Cremona M (ed) Compliance and the enforcement of EU law. OUP, Oxford, pp 74–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Drake S (2016) More effective private enforcement of EU law post-Lisbon: aligning regulatory goals and constitutional values. In: Drake S, Smith M (eds) New directions in the effective enforcement of EU law and policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 12–44Google Scholar
  13. Eilmansberger T (2004) The relationship between rights and remedies in EU law: in search of the missing link. Common Market Law Review 41:1199–1246Google Scholar
  14. Grundmann S (2012) European company law. Organization, finance and capital markets, 2nd edn. Intersentia, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Hirte H (1996) Die Entwicklung des Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrechts in Deutschland in den Jahren 1991–995. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 49:2827–2847Google Scholar
  16. Lafarge F (2010) Administrative cooperation between Member States and implementation of EU law. Eur Public Law 16:597–616Google Scholar
  17. Lenaerts K (2011) National remedies for private parties in the light of the EU law principles of equivalence and effectiveness. Irish Jurist 46:13–37Google Scholar
  18. Leyens PC (2001) European takeovers: a framework for adequate shareholder protection. Eur Bus Law Rev 12:42–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Prechal S (1997) EC requirements for an effective remedy. In: Lonbay J, Biondi A (eds) Remedies for breach of EC law. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  20. Sarmiento D (2013) Who’s afraid of the Charter? Common Mark Law Rev 50:1267–1304Google Scholar
  21. Skog R (1996) Offentliga uppköbserbjudanden på aktiemarknaden: nytt förslag til harmoniseringsdirektiv. BALANS 6–7:23–28Google Scholar
  22. Snell J (2010) The notion of market access: a concept or a slogan? Common Mark Law Rev 47:437–472Google Scholar
  23. Sørensen KE (2014a) Branches of companies in the EU: balancing the Eleventh Company Law Directive, national company law and the right of establishment. Eur Company and Financial Law Review 11:53–96Google Scholar
  24. Sørensen KE (2014b) Company law as a restriction to free movement: examination of the notion of ‘restriction’ using company law as the frame of reference. Eur Co Law 11:178–188Google Scholar
  25. Sørensen KE (2015) Member States’ implementation of penalties to enforce EU law: balancing the avoidance of enforcement deficits and the protection of individuals. Eur Law Rev 40:811–831Google Scholar
  26. Szwarc M (2014) Application of the charter of fundamental rights in the context of sanctions imposed by member states for infringements of EU law: comment on Fransson case. Eur Public Law 20:229–246Google Scholar
  27. Thomas S (2012) Guilty of a gault that one has not committed. J Eur Compet Law Pract 3:11–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tridimas T (2006) The general principles of EU law, 2nd edn. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Tupits A (2000) The duties and liabilities of directors under EU company law. Int Comp Corp Law J 2:389–414Google Scholar
  30. Van Gerven W (2000) Of rights, remedies and procedures. Common Mark Law Rev 37:501–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ward Z (2000) Judicial review and the rights of private parties in EC law. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Wilman F (2015) Private enforcement of EU law before national courts. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wilman FG (2016) The end of the absence? The growing body of EU legislation on private enforcement and the main remedies it provides for. Common Mark Law Rev 53:887–935Google Scholar
  34. Witt CH (1998) Der neue Vorschlag für eine EG-Richtlinie über Übernahmeangebote. Europäisches Wirtschafts- und Steuerrecht (EWS) 8:318–323Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Professor, Department of LawAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations