After many waves of democratisation a new type of constitutional transformation has become the focus of scholarly attention. Some researchers claim that the current erosion of constitutionalism can be understood better if the phenomenon is compared to the twentieth century dictatorships. Many others argue that what is happening today is a self-destruction of liberal democracy through democratic procedures and under the formal rule of law. This article aims to contribute to the understanding of the new system, and offers another approach. It shows that in a normative sense democracy today is the only legitimate constitutional system. That is why a key attribute of contemporary authoritarianism, a sui generis system between constitutional democracy and dictatorship, is a pretence of democracy. The article suggests that mechanisms of pretence can be identified with the help of constitutional markers, which allow a reliable distinction between constitutional democracy and authoritarianism. Constitutional markers can be revealed on two levels: first, by a systematic account of the constitutional text and practice and second, by exploring the deep structure of the false justification of the system.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Montesquieu (1999) at 129.
Montesquieu (1989) Book XI Chapter 6 at 157.
Kant (1983) at 107, 114.
Aristotle (2009) Book III. Chapter 7. 1279a, 97–100.
Montesquieu (1989) Book III Chapter 2 at 21.
Dworkin (2011) at 321.
Kant (1983) at 114–115.
Schmitt (2005) at 50–52.
Schmitt (1985) at 30–32.
Lendvai (2017) at 177–188.
The Constitution of the Russian Federation, Article 1 and Article 80/2.
Tsygankov (2014) at 130–140.
Kornai (2017) at 290.
Hart (1994) at 4.
Hart (1994) at 4, 126.
Ginsburg and Huq (2018).
Dworkin (2004) at 9.
Kis (2003) at ix–x.
This approach is slightly different from my Authoritarianism, see Tóth (2017b).
Loewenstein (1957) at 148–149.
Barendt (1998) at 6.
Loewenstein (1957) at 149–150.
See in detail Tóth (2012).
Schedler (2013) at 54–61.
Varol (2015) at 1689.
Albright M (2018) Fascism: a warning. Harper, New York
Arendt H (2004) The origins of totalitarianism. Schocken, New York
Aristotle (2009) Politics (transl. Barker E, rev. Stalley F). Oxford UP, Oxford
Baker CE (2011) Autonomy and hate speech. In: Hare I, Weinstein J (eds) Extreme speech and democracy. Oxford UP, Oxford, pp 139–157
Barendt A (1998) An introduction to constitutional law. Oxford UP, Oxford
Bunce VJ, Wolchik SL (2011) Defeating authoritarian leaders in postcommunist countries. Cambridge UP, Cambridge
Churchill W (1947) Speech on the Parliament Bill, House of Commons, 11 November 1947. https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1947/nov/11/parliament-bill. Accessed 20 July 2018
Corrales J (2015) The Authoritarian Resurgence: autocratic Legalism in Venezuela. J Democr 26(2):37–51
Diamond L (2002) Thinking about hybrid regimes. J Democr 13(2):21–35
Diamond L (2015) Facing up to the democratic recession. J Democr 26(1):141–155
Diamond L, Plattner MF, Walker C (eds) (2016) Authoritarianism goes global: the challenge to democracy. Johns Hopkins UP, Baltimore
Dworkin R (1977) Taking rights seriously. Harvard UP, Cambridge
Dworkin R (1996) Freedom’s law: the moral reading of the American constitution. Harvard UP, Cambridge
Dworkin R (1998) Law’s empire. Hart, London
Dworkin R (2004) Hart’s postscript and the character of political philosophy. Oxf J Legal Stud 24(1):1–37
Dworkin R (2011) Justice for Hedgehogs. Belknap Harvard UP, Cambridge
Dworkin R (2012) What is democracy? In: Tóth GA (ed) Constitution for a disunited nation: on Hungary’s 2011 fundamental law. CEU Press, New York
Dyzenhaus D (2006) The constitution of law: legality in a time of emergency 2006. Cambridge UP, Cambridge
Dyzenhaus D (2012) State of emergency. In: Sajó A, Rosenfeld M (eds) Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law. Oxford UP, Oxford, pp 442–461
Ely JH (1980) Democracy and distrust: a theory of judicial review. Harvard UP, Cambridge
Freedom House (2016) Freedom in the world report 2016: anxious dictators, wavering democracies: global freedom under pressure. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2016. Accessed 20 July 2018
Freedom House (2017) Freedom in the world report 2017: populists and autocrats: the dual threat to global democracy. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2017. Accessed 20 July 2018
Gallie WB (1956) Essentially contested concepts. Proc Aristot Soc 56:167–198
Ginsburg T, Huq A (2018) How to lose a constitutional democracy. 65. UCLA Law Rev 65:78 (80–169)
Ginsburg T, Simpser A (eds) (2014) Constitutions in authoritarian regimes. Cambridge UP, Cambridge
Grimm D (2002) Die Zukunft der Verfassung. Suhrkamp, Berlin
Grimm D (2012) Types of constitutions. In: Sajó A, Rosenfeld M (eds) Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law. Oxford UP, Oxford, pp 98–132
Hart HLA (1994) The concept of law, 2nd edn. Clarendon, Oxford
Hirschl R (2007) Towards juristocracy: the origins and consequences of the new constitutionalism. Harvard UP, Cambridge
Huntington S (1991) The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman
Kant I (1983) Perpetual peace and other essays on politics, history, and morals (transl. Humphrey T). Hackett, Indianapolis
Karl TL (1995) The hybrid regimes of central America. J Democr 6(3):72–86
Kelsen H (1976) Wesen und Entwicklung der Staatsgerichtsbarkeit. In: Häberle P (ed) Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt
Kelsen H (2000) On the essence and value of democracy. In: Jacobson A, Schlink B (eds) Weimar: a jurisprudence of crisis (Cooper B transl.). University of California Press, Oakland, p 84
Kis J (2003) Constitutional democracy. CEU Press, New York
Kornai J (2017) The system paradigm revisited: clarification and additions in the light of experiences in the post-socialist region. Revue D’Études Comparatives Est-Ouest 48(1–2):239–296
Körösényi A (2005) Political representation in leader democracy. Gov Oppos 40(3):358–378
Kumm M (2007) Institutionalising socratic contestation: the rationalist human rights paradigm, legitimate authority and the point of judicial review. Eur J Legal Stud 1(2):1–32
Kurylo B (2016) Russia and Carl Schmitt: the hybridity of resistance in the globalised world. Palgrave Commun 2:16096
Landau D (2013) Abusive constitutionalism. UC Davis. Law Rev 47:189
Landau D (2018) Populist constitutions. Univ Chic Law Rev 85:521
Lendvai P (2017) Orbán: Hungary’s strongman. Oxford UP, Oxford
Levitsky S, Way LA (2002) The rise of competitive authoritarianism. J Democr 13(2):51–65
Levitsky S, Way LA (2010) Competitive authoritarianism: hybrid regimes after cold war. Cambridge UP, Cambridge
Levitsky S, Ziblatt D (2018) How democracies die: what history reveals about our future. Viking/Penguin, New York
Linz JJ (1978) The breakdown of democratic regimes: crisis, Breakdown and reequilibration. An introduction. Johns Hopkins UP, Baltimore
Linz JJ (2000) Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes. Lynne Rienner, Boulder
Lipset SM, Lakin JM (2004) The democratic century. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman
Loewenstein K (1957) Political power and the governmental process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Merkel W (2004) Embedded and defective democracies. Democratization 11(5):33–58
Merkel W, Puhle HJ et al (2003) Defekte demokratien. Band I: theorie. Taschenbuch, Munich
Montesquieu (1989) The spirit of the laws (transl. and eds. Cohler AM, Miller BC, Stone HS). Cambridge UP, Cambridge
Montesquieu (1999) Considerations on the Causes of the greatness of the romans and their decline (transl. Lowenthal D). Hackett, London
Mudde C, Kaltwasser CR (eds) (2013) Populism in Europe and the Americas: threat or corrective for democracy?. Cambridge UP, Cambridge
Mudde C, Kaltwasser CR (2017) Populism: a very short introduction. Oxford UP, Oxford
Müller JW (2018) Homo orbánicus. N Y Rev Books 65(6). https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2018/04/05/homo-orbanicus-hungary/
Murphy L (2014) What makes law: an introduction to the philosophy of law. Cambridge UP, Cambridge
Ottaway M (2003) Democracy challenged: the rise of semi-authoritarianism. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, D.C.
Rustow DA (1970) Transitions to democracy: toward a dynamic model. Comp Politics 2(3):337–363
Sadurski W (2018) How democracy dies (in Poland): a case-study of anti-constitutional populist backsliding. Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 18/01. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3103491. Accessed 26 Aug 2018
Sadurski W (2018b) Polish constitutional tribunal under PiS: from an activist court, to a paralysed tribunal, to a governmental enabler. Hague J Rule Law. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0078-1 (Accessed 26 August 2018)
Sartori G (1962) Constitutionalism: a preliminary discussion. Am Political Sci Rev 56:853–864
Schedler A (ed) (2006) Electoral authoritarianism: the dynamics of unfree competition. Lynne Rienner, Boulder
Schedler A (2013) The politics of uncertainty: sustaining and subverting electoral authoritarianism. Oxford UP, Oxford
Scheppele KL (2018) Autocratic Legalism. Univ Chic Law Rev 85:545
Schmitt C (1985) The crisis of parliamentary democracy (transl. Kennedy E). MIT Press, Cambridge
Schmitt C (1996) Der Hüter der Verfassung. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin
Schmitt C (2005) Political theology: four chapters on the concept of sovereignty (transl. Schwab G). University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Schmitt C (2014) Dictatorship: from the origin of the modern concept of sovereignty to proletarian class struggle (trans. Hoelzl M, Ward G). Polity Press, Cambridge
Tóth GA (ed) (2012) Constitution for a disunited nation: on Hungary’s 2011 fundamental law. CEU Press, New York
Tóth GA (2017a) Authoritarianism. In: Grote R, Lachenmann F, Wolfrum R (eds) Max planck encyclopedia of comparative constitutional law. Oxford UP, Oxford, pp 1–15. http://oxcon.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law-mpeccol/law-mpeccol-e205. Accessed 20 July 2018
Tóth GA (2017b) The authoritarian’s new clothes: tendencies away from constitutional democracy. Centre for Socio-Legal Studies and Wolfson College at the University of Oxford. http://www.fljs.org/content/authoritarians-new-clothes-tendencies-away-constitutional-democracy. Accessed 20 July 2018
Tsygankov AP (2014) The strong state in Russia: development and crisis. Oxford UP, Oxford
Tushnet M (1999) Taking the constitution away from the courts. Princeton, Princeton UP
Tushnet M (2015) Authoritarian constitutionalism. Cornell Law Rev 100:391
Van Herpen MH (2014) Putin’s wars: the rise of Russia’s new imperialism. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham
Varol OO (2015) Stealth authoritarianism. Iowa Law Rev 100:1673–1742
Waldron J (1999) Law and disagreement. Clarendon, Oxford
Waldron J (2006) The core of the case against judicial review. Yale Law J 115:1346
Waldron J (2012) The harm in hate speech. Harvard UP, Cambridge
Zakaria F (1997) The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Aff 76(6):22–43
Versions of this paper were presented at the workshops “Beyond the Liberal Constitution”, Wolfson College, University of Oxford; “Constitutionalism, Dissent, and Resistance”, Humboldt University and Princeton University, Berlin; “Resurgence of Executive Primary in the Age of Populism”, Academia Sinica, Taipei; and at the GlobCon Colloquium of the WZB Berlin Social Science Center. I wish to thank Teodor Papuc for his research, and János Kis, Kriszta Kovács and Mattias Kumm for their helpful comments.
About this article
Cite this article
Tóth, G.A. Constitutional Markers of Authoritarianism. Hague J Rule Law 11, 37–61 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0081-6
- Constitutive Marker
- Constitutional Democracy
- Constitutional Transformation
- Contemporary Dictatorships
- Authoritarian Constitutionalism